Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:23:07.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intensive language training in the rehabilitation of chronic aphasia: Efficient training by laypersons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2007

MARCUS MEINZER ,
SILKE STREIFTAU  and
BRIGITTE ROCKSTROH
MARCUS MEINZER
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
SILKE STREIFTAU
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
BRIGITTE ROCKSTROH
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intense language training has been found to be more efficient in the rehabilitation of chronic aphasia than treatment spread across time. Intense treatment, however, challenges personnel and financial resources of the health care system. The present study examined, whether laypersons can be trained to apply standardized language training for chronic aphasia with effects comparable to training by experts. Twenty individuals with chronic aphasia participated in the training, Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT), which comprises communicative language games with increasing level of difficulty in a motivating context for 3 hr/day on 10 consecutive days. Following a random-control design, training was applied either by experienced therapists (n = 10) or trained laypersons (n = 10). Standardized language assessments revealed significant within-group improvements, however, between-group differences were not present. We conclude that a standardized training program, such as CIAT, can be efficiently accomplished by trained laypersons with results comparable to that of experienced therapists. (JINS, 2007, 13, 846–853.)

Keywords

Language therapyTreatment outcomeStrokeLanguage disordersVolunteersIntensive training
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 846 - 853
Copyright
2007 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barthel, G. (2005). Modell-orientierte Sprachtherapie und Aachener Sprachanalyse [Model-orientated aphasia therapy and Aachen Language Analysis]. Konstanz, Germany: University of Konstanz.
Barthel, G., Djundja, D., Meinzer, M., Rockstroh, B., & Eulitz, C. (2006). Aachen Language Analysis (ASPA): Evaluation in chronic aphasia. Sprache Stimme Gehör, 30, 103–110.Google Scholar
Bhogal, S.K., Teasell, R.W., Foley, N.C., & Speechley, M.R. (2003a). Rehabilitation of aphasia: More is better. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10, 66–76.Google Scholar
Bhogal, S.K., Teasell, R., & Speechley, M. (2003b). Intensity of aphasia therapy: Impact on recovery. Stroke, 34, 987–993.Google Scholar
Code, C. & Herrmann, M. (2003). The relevance of emotional and psychosocial factors in aphasia to rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 109–132.Google Scholar
David, R., Enderby, P., & Bainton, D. (1982). Treatment of acquired aphasia: Speech therapists and volunteers compared. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 45, 957–961.Google Scholar
Dobkin, B.H. (2005). Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine, 352, 1677–1684.Google Scholar
Elbert, T. & Rockstroh, B. (2004). Reorganisation of the human cerebral cortex: The range of changes following use and injury. The Neuroscientist, 10, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadar, U., Wenkert-Olenik, D., Krauss, R., & Soroker, N. (1998). Gesture and the processing of speech: Neuropsychological evidence. Brain and Language, 62, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinckley, J.J. & Packard, M.E. (2001). Family education seminars and social functioning of adults with chronic aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, A.L., Frattali, C.M., & Fromm D. (1999). Communication activities of daily living (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Huber, H., Poek, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachenen Aphasia Test. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia—Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12, 813–830.Google Scholar
Lesser, R., Bryan, K., Anderson, J., & Hilton, R. (1986). Involving relatives in aphasia therapy: An application of language enrichment therapy. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 9, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J.G., Cariski, D., Keisler, L., Rosenbek, J., Levine, R., Kumpula, J., Ryff, C., Coyne, S., & Blanc, M. (1997). Communication partners: Enhancing participation in life and communication for adults with aphasia in natural settings. Aphasiology, 11, 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, L.M., Kendall, D., Swearengin, J.A., Rodriguez, A., Leon, S.A., Pingel, K., Holland, A., & Rothi, L.J. (2006). A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of constraint induced language therapy. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 843–852.Google Scholar
Marshall, R.C., Wertz, R.T., Weiss, D.G., Aten, J.L., Brookshire, R.H., Garcia-Bunuel, L., Holland, A.L., Kurtzke, J.F., LaPointe, L.L., Milianti, F.J., Brannegan, R., Greenbaum, H., Vogel, D., Carter, J., Barnes, N.S., & Goodman, R. (1989). Home treatment for aphasic patients by trained nonprofessionals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 462–470.Google Scholar
Meikle, M., Wechsler, E., Tupper, A., Benenson, M., Butler, J., Mulhall, D., & Stern, D. (1979). Comparative trial of volunteer and professional treatments of dysphasia after stroke. British Medical Journal, 2, 87–89.Google Scholar
Meinzer, M., Djundja, D., Barthel, G., Elbert, T., & Rockstroh, B. (2005). Long-term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke, 36, 1462–1466.Google Scholar
Meinzer, M., Obleser, J., Flaisch, T., Eulitz, C., & Rockstroh, B. (2007). Recovery from aphasia as a function of language therapy in an early bilingual patient demonstrated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1247–1256.Google Scholar
Morris, D.M., Taub, E., & Mark, V.W. (2006). Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica, 42, 257–268.Google Scholar
Nickels, N. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935–979.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P.M., Jorgensen, H.S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H.O., & Olsen, T.S. (1995). Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery. Annals of Neurology, 38, 659–666.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P.M., Vinter, K., & Olsen, T.S. (2004). Aphasia after stroke: Type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovascular Disease, 17, 35–43.Google Scholar
Pulvermueller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., & Taub, E. (2001). Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke, 32, 1621–1626.Google Scholar
Rayner, H. & Marshall, J. (2003). Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38, 149–164.Google Scholar
Robey, R.R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 41, 172–187.Google Scholar
Shewan, C.M. & Kertesz, A. (1984). Effects of speech and language treatment on recovery from aphasia. Brain and Language, 23, 272–299.Google Scholar
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Elbert, T. (2002). New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 228–236.Google Scholar
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Pidikiti, R. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation–a clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36, 237–251.Google Scholar
Wertz, R.T., Weiss, D.G., Aten, J.L., Brookshire, R.H., Garcia-Bunuel, L., Holland, A.L., Kurtzke, J.F., LaPointe, L.L., Milianti, F.J., Brannegan, R., Greenbaum, H., Marshall, R.C., Vogel, D., Carter, J.C., Barnes, N.S., & Goodman, R. (1986). Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Archives of Neurology, 43, 653–658.Google Scholar
Worrall, L. & Yiu, E. (2000). Effectiveness of functional communication therapy by volunteers for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology, 14, 911–924.Google Scholar