Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:04:07.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Humor processing, mentalizing, and executive function in normal aging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2006

JENNIFER UEKERMANN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
SHELLEY CHANNON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
IRENE DAUM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Abstract

Recent investigations have emphasized the importance of the prefrontal cortex for humor processing. Although the prefrontal cortex is thought to be affected by normal aging, relatively little work has been carried out to investigate the effects of aging on humor processing. In the present investigation participants in three age groups were assessed on a humor comprehension task. They then answered mentalistic and nonmentalistic questions. Executive tasks were also administered. The older group selected significantly fewer correct punchlines from alternatives than the other groups. They were also poorer at answering mentalistic questions, but did not differ significantly for nonmentalistic questions. The findings of the present investigation showed altered in humor processing in normal aging, and this appeared to be related to mentalizing ability. (JINS, 2006, 12, 184–191.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bäumler, G. (1985). Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J. Stroop. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Beck, A.T. & Steer, R.A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory—Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Bihrle, A.M., Brownell, H.H., Powelson, J.A., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humourous and nonhumourous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition, 5, 399411.Google Scholar
Brennan, M., Welsh, M.C., & Fisher, C.B. (1997). Aging and executive function skills: An examination of a community-dwelling older adult population. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 11871197.Google Scholar
Brownell, H.H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humour in right-hemisphere patients. Brain and Language, 18, 2027.Google Scholar
Castelli, F., Happe, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12, 314325.Google Scholar
Corcoran, R., Cahill, C., & Frith, C.D. (1997). The appreciation of visual jokes in people with schizophrenia: A study of ‘mentalizing’ ability. Schizophrenia Research, 24, 319327.Google Scholar
Dahl, G. (1986). Reduzierter Wechsler Intelligenztest (WIP). Königstein, Germany: Hain-Verlag.
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 18998.Google Scholar
Gallagher, H.L. & Frith, C.D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 7783.Google Scholar
Gallagher, H.L., Happe, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P.C., Frith, U., & Frith, C.D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1121.Google Scholar
Goel, V. & Dolan, R.J. (2001). The functional anatomy of humour: Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 237238.Google Scholar
Happé, F.G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129154.Google Scholar
Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70, 211240.Google Scholar
Happé, F.G., Winner, E., & Brownell, H. (1998). The getting of wisdom: Theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34, 358362.Google Scholar
MacPherson, S.E., Phillips, L.H., & Della Sala, S. (2002). Age, executive function, and social decision making: A dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 17, 598609.Google Scholar
Maylor, E.A., Moulson, J.M., Muncer, A.M., & Taylor, L.A. (2002). Does performance on theory of mind tasks decline in old age? British Journal of Psychology, 93, 465485.Google Scholar
Milham, M.P., Erickson, K.I., Banich, M.T., Kramer, A.F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N.J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49, 277296.Google Scholar
Reitan, R.M. (1992). Trail Making Test. South Tucson, Arizona: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
Saltzman, J., Strauss, E., Hunter, M., & Archibald, S. (2000). Theory of mind and executive functions in normal human aging and Parkinson's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 781788.Google Scholar
Schaier, A.H. & Cicirelli, V.G. (1976). Age differences in humor comprehension and appreciation in old age. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 577582.Google Scholar
Shammi, P. & Stuss, D.T. (1999). Humour appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122, 657666.Google Scholar
Shammi, P. & Stuss, D.T. (2003). The effects of normal aging on humour appreciation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 855863.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., Gallup, G.G., Jr., & Alexander, M.P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain, 124, 279286.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T. & Levine, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies on the frontal lobes. Annual Reviews on Psychology, 53, 401433.Google Scholar
Sullivan, S. & Ruffman, T. (2004). Social understanding: How does it fare with advancing years? British Journal of Psychology, 95, 118.Google Scholar
Suls, J.M. (1972). Cognitive processes in humour appreciation. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humour: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York: Academic Press.
Thompson-Schill, S.L., Jonides, J., Marshuetz, C., Smith, E.E., D'Esposito, M., Kan, I.P., Knight, R.T., & Swick, D. (2002). Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience, 2, 109120.Google Scholar
Tisserand, D.J. & Jolles, J. (2003). On the involvement of prefrontal networks in cognitive aging. Cortex, 39, 11071128.Google Scholar
Tisserand, D.J., Pruessner, J.C., Sanz Arigita, E.J., van Boxtel, M.P., Evans, A.C., Jolles, J., & Uylings, H.B. (2002). Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: An MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage, 17, 657669.Google Scholar
Treitz, F., Heyder, K., & Daum, I., (in press). Differential course of executive control changes during normal aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition.
Wang, G.J., Volkow, N.D., Logan, J., Fowler, J.S., Schlyer, D., MacGregor, R.R., Hitzemann, R.J., Gur, R.C., & Wolf, A.P. (1995). Evaluation of age-related changes in serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptor availability in healthy human participants. Life Sciences, 56, 249253.Google Scholar
Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 1533.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale. San Antonio, Texas: Harcourt.
West, R. & Covell, E. (2001). Effects of aging on event related neural activity related to prospective memory. Neuroreport, 12, 28552858.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happe, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 62, 89106.Google Scholar