Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T08:20:36.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting the Hang of It: Preferential Gist Over Verbatim Story Recall and the Roles of Attentional Capacity and the Episodic Buffer in Alzheimer Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2010

Nancy S. Foldi
Nancy S. Foldi*
Affiliation:
Queens College and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, Flushing, New York
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Nancy S. Foldi, Department of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York (CUNY), 65-30 Kissena Blvd, Science Building E318, Flushing, NY 11367. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Story recall in Alzheimer disease (AD) is typically used as a measure of episodic memory, but the degree to which recall is dependent on available attentional resources is not fully understood. The current study investigated how measures of attention were associated to verbatim recall (exact reproduction) or gist recall (relevant semantic meaning). Sixteen participants with AD and 16 age-matched healthy older adults recalled a story on immediate free recall and recognition. Controls recalled more units overall than AD. A group × response interaction revealed more gist than verbatim recall in AD, but those with mild disease generated approximately the same number gist responses as controls. For each group, qualitatively different attentional resources were associated with recall units. In controls, verbatim units correlated positively with primacy serial position items of the California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLTII), suggesting that episodic buffer resources may be associated with story recall. In AD, gist units were positively correlated with digits forward, but inversely related to the CVLTII primacy region items, suggesting reliance on low-level capacity resources. Possible explanations of the impaired performance in AD may be a bias in favor of gist processing, poor verbatim encoding, and/or processing failure at the level of the episodic buffer. (JINS, 2011, 17, 000–000)

Keywords

Alzheimer diseaseResource capacityEpisodic bufferAttentionLanguage processingDiscourseStory recall
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 69 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D. (2001). The concept of episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 356, 1345–1350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0957CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D., Baddeley, H.D., Bucks, R.S., Wilcock, G.K. (2001). Attentional control in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 124, 1492–1508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A.D., Hitch, G.J. (1974). Working memory. In Bowers, G.A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation: Vol. 2. (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Wilson, B.A. (2002). Prose recall and amnesia: Implications for the structure of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1737–1743. doi: S0028393201001464 [pii]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayles, K.A., Tomoeda, C.K. (1983). Confrontation naming impairment in dementia. Brain and Language, 19, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamini, Y., Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188.Google Scholar
Benton, A., Hamsher, K.d., Varney, N.R., Spreen, O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A clinical manual. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brookshire, R.H., Nicholas, L.E. (1984). Comprehension of directly and indirectly stated main ideas and details in discourse by brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged listeners. Brain and Language, 21, 21–36.Google Scholar
Buschke, H., Sliwinski, M.J., Kuslansky, G., Katz, M., Verghese, J., Lipton, R.B. (2006). Retention weighted recall improves discrimination of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 436–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butters, N., Granholm, E., Salmon, D.P., Grant, I., Wolfe, J. (1987). Episodic and semantic memory: A comparison of amnesic and demented patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 479–497.Google Scholar
Chan, A.S., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P. (1997). The deterioration of semantic networks in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A cross-sectional study. Neuropsychologia, 35, 241–248. doi: S0028-3932(96)00067-X [pii]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, A.S., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., McGuire, K.A. (1993). Dimensionality and clustering in the semantic network of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 8, 411–419.Google Scholar
Chan, A.S., Salmon, D.P., De La Pena, J. (2001). Abnormal semantic network for “animals” but not “tools” in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex, 37, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S.B., Zientz, J., Weiner, M., Rosenberg, R., Frawley, W., Burns, M.H. (2002). Discourse changes in early Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 16, 177–186.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kaplan, E., Kramer, J.H., Ober, B.A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test—II (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ebel, R.L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16, 407–424.Google Scholar
Foldi, N.S., Brickman, A.M., Knutelska, M.E., Schaefer, L.A. (2004). Serial position profiles distinguish depression from normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 42.Google Scholar
Foldi, N.S., Brickman, A.M., Schaefer, L.A., Knutelska, M.E. (2003). Distinct serial position profiles and neuropsychological measures differentiate late life depression from normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Research, 120, 71–84. doi: S016517810300163X [pii]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foldi, N.S., Schaefer, L.A., White, R.E.C., Johnson, R. Jr, Berger, J.T., Carney, M.T., Macina, L.O. (2005). Effects of graded levels of physical similarity and density on visual selective attention in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 19, 5–17. doi: 2005-00128-002 [pii] 10.1037/0894-4105.19.1.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi: 0022-3956(75)90026-6 [pii]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, D.A., Shahid, K.R., Olson, M.A., Solomon, T.M., Schacter, D.L., Budson, A.E. (2006). Overdependence on degraded gist memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 20, 625–632. doi: 2006-20657-001 [pii] 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.625Google Scholar
Hudon, C., Belleville, S., Souchay, C., Gely-Nargeot, M.C., Chertkow, H., Gauthier, S. (2006). Memory for gist and detail information in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology, 20, 566–577. doi: 2006-10978-007 [pii] 10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.566Google Scholar
Johnson, D.K., Storandt, M., Balota, D.A. (2003). Discourse analysis of logical memory recall in normal aging and in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 17, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test: Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. The American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., Young, S.R. (1984). Selective recall of decision-relevant information from texts. Memory & Cognition, 12, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluger, A., Ferris, S.H., Golomb, J., Mittelman, M.S., Reisberg, B. (1999). Neuropsychological prediction of decline to dementia in nondemented elderly. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 12, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Rue, A., Hermann, B., Jones, J.E., Johnson, S., Asthana, S., Sager, M.A. (2008). Effect of parental family history of Alzheimer’s disease on serial position profiles. Alzheimers & Dementia, 4, 285–290.Google Scholar
Mattis, S. (2005). Dementia Rating Scale—2: Vol. 2. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Maylor, E.A., Rabbitt, P.M., James, G.H., Kerr, S.A. (1990). Comparing the effects of alcohol and intelligence on text recall and recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 81(Pt 3), 299–313.Google Scholar
McKhann, G.M., Drachman, D., Folstein, M.F., Katzman, R., Price, D., Stadlan, E.M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the aupices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.Google Scholar
Monsch, A.U., Bondi, M., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Katzman, R., Thal, L.J. (1992). Comparisons of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 49, 1253–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monsch, A.U., Foldi, N.S., Ermini-Fünfschilling, D., Berres, M., Stähelin, H.B., Spiegel, R. (1995). Improving the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 92, 145–150.Google Scholar
Murdock, B.B. Jr (1962). Serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H.E. (1982). The National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Nicholas, L.E., Brookshire, R.H. (1995). Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 38, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, L.A., Pare, N., Saykin, A.J., Brown, M.J., Wishart, H.A., Flashman, L.A., Santulli, R.B. (2009). Differential memory test sensitivity for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment and predicting conversion to Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 16, 357–376. doi: 910287017 [pii] 10.1080/13825580902825220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripich, D.N., Terrell, B.Y. (1988). Patterns of discourse cohesion and coherence in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudner, M., Fransson, P., Ingvar, M., Nyberg, L., Rönnberg, J. (2007). Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2258–2276. doi: S0028-3932(07)00077-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J. (2008). The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processing, 9, 19–28. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0183-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, D., Thomas, R.G., Pay, M.M., Booth, A., Hofstetter, C.R., Thal, J.L., Katzman, R. (2002). Alzheimer’s disease can be accurately diagnosed in very mild impaired individuals. Neurology, 59, 1022–1028.Google Scholar
Ska, B., Duong, A. (2005). Communication, discourse and dementia. Psychologie & Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement, 3, 125–133.Google Scholar
Spreen, O., Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SPSS (2009). IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statisics for Windows, version 18.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Statsoft (2009). Statistica v.8.0. Tulsa, OK: Statsoft.Google Scholar
Talland, G.A., Ekdahl, M. (1959). Psychological studies of Korsakoff’s psychosis: IV. The rate and mode of forgetting narrative material. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 129, 391–404.Google Scholar
Waters, G., Caplan, D. (2005). The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension. Memory, 13, 403–413.Google ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale—Third Edition (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Welland, R.J., Lubinski, R., Higginbotham, D.J. (2002). Discourse comprehension test performance of elders with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1175–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed