Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:26:25.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissociable contributions of the two cerebral hemispheres to judgments of line orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Ziyah Mehta  and
Freda Newcombe
Ziyah Mehta
Affiliation:
Russell-Cairns Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, The Radeliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Freda Newcombe
Affiliation:
Russell-Cairns Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, The Radeliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A previous study of the performance of men with chronic unilateral focal brain lesions (due to wartime missile injury) on a standard test of line orientation suggested a left hemisphere (LH) as well as a right hemisphere (RH) contribution to visuospatial processing. The present study was designed to fractionate the variables that could underlie this unexpected finding and thereby to tease out the mechanisms involved in LH as compared with RH processing. A simpler (“purer”) version of the standard line orientation task was used, as were two other versions in which matching in an array and matching with distractors were measured. The findings confirmed the hypothesis of RH involvement in the purer task of metric measurement and suggested that the LH has an important role in keeping track of decisions and updating decisions in more complex aspects of line orientation judgment. (JINS, 1996, 2, 335–339.)

Keywords

Hemispheric differencesLine orientation judgment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , July 1996 , pp. 335 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benton, A.L., Varney, N.R., and Hamber, K. deS. (1978). Visuospatial judgment: A clinical test. Archives of Neurology, 25, 364–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, Renzi & Faglioni, P. (1965). The comparative efficiency of intelligence and vigilance tests in detecting hemispheric cerebral damage. Cortex, 1, 410–433.Google Scholar
Hamsher, K., Capruso, D.X., & Benton, A. (1992). Visuospatial judgement and right hemisphere disease. Cortex, 28, 493–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S.M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemisphere: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 148–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Z. & Newcombe, F. (1991). A role for the left hemisphere in spatial processing. Cortex, 27, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, Z., Newcombe, F., & Damasio, H. (1987). A left hemisphere contribution to visuospatial processing. Cortex, 23, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, F. (1969). Missile wounds of the brain: A study of psychological defects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxbury, J.M. (1975). The right hemisphere and hemispheric disconnection. In Matthews, W.B. (Ed.), Recent advances in clinical neurology (pp 1–22). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Oxbury, J.M., Campbell, D.C., & Oxbury, S.M. (1974). Unilateral spatial neglect and impairments of spatial analysis and visual perception. Brain, 97, 551–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogels, R., Saunders, R.C., & Orban, G. (1994). Hemispheric lateralization in rhesus monkeys can be task-dependent. Neuropsychologia, 32, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winer, B.J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar