Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:37:14.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural aspects of music perception: Validation of a Greek version of the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

EVANGELOS PARASKEVOPOULOS ,
KYRANA TSAPKINI  and
ISABELLE PERETZ
EVANGELOS PARASKEVOPOULOS*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
KYRANA TSAPKINI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
ISABELLE PERETZ
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound (BRAMS), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Evangelos Paraskevopoulos, Doridas 12, Thessaloniki, Greece, 54633. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite music’s universality, people perceive and interpret music according to their cultural background. The existing music perception batteries, however, do not take into account possible cultural differences. We adapted the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusias (MBEA) into the requirements of Eastern (Greek) music, where rhythm and melody scales are different from the ones used in Western music. We obtained norms for both the original version of MBEA and its Greek adaptation from the same Greek participants because they are exposed to both genres (traditional and Eastern). Results indicate that some parts of the original MBEA such as the meter test would not be suitable for evaluating the musical abilities of populations with a different musical tradition. Instead, our version of the MBEA, the Greek Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (GBEA) should be preferred in assessing music perception in cultures or individuals influenced by Eastern or both traditions. We also report the results of a congenitally amusic individual (B.Z.) evaluated with both batteries showing that GBEA is a more sensitive tool to evaluate her impairment in music perception. (JINS, 2010, 16, 695–704.)

Keywords

Musical cognitionAmusiaCultural differencesMusic perceptionMBEAGBEA
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 695 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ardila, A. (2005). Cultural values underlying psychometric cognitive testing. Neuropsychology Review, 15, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardila, A., & Moreno, S. (2001). Neuropsychological evaluation in Aruaco Indians: An exploratory study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 7, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayari, M., & McAdams, S. (2003). Aural analysis of Arabic improvised instrumental music. Music Perception, 21, 159–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayotte, J., Peretz, I., & Hyde, K. (2002). Congenital amusia: A group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder. Brain, 125, 238–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayotte, J., Peretz, I., Rousseau, I., Bard, C., & Bojanowski, M. (2000). Patterns of music agnosia associated with middle cerebral artery artefact. Brain, 123, 1926–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.R., & Garthwaite, P.H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, I. (2003). Music, cognition, culture and evolution. In Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of music. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cuddy, L.L., Balkwill, L., Peretz, I., & Holden, R.R. (2005). Musical difficulties are rare: A study of “Tone Deafness” among university students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalla-Bella, S., & Peretz, I. (2003). Congenital amusia interferes with the ability to synchronize with music. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 999, 166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, F.R. (2002). Minority and cross-cultural aspects of neuropsychological assessment. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Griffith, T., Rees, A., Witton, C., Cross, P., Shakir, R., & Green, G. (1997). Spatial and temporal auditory processing deficits following right hemisphere infarction: A psychophysical study. Brain, 120, 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, E.E., & Trehub, S.E. (2005). Metrical categories in infancy and adulthood. Psychological Science, 16, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, K.L., & Peretz, I. (2004). Brains that are out of tune but in time. Psychological Science, 15, 356–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janata, P. (2004). When music tells a story. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 203–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, B.B. (2006). Music and brain plasticity. European Review, 14, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, A. (1890). On disorders of the musical capacity from cerebral disease. Brain, 13, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W.A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 578–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosmidis, M.H., Vlahou, C.H., Panagiotaki, P., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2004). The verbal fluency task in the Greek population: Normative data and clustering and switching strategies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamy, M. (1907). Amnésie musicale chez un aphasique sensoriel. Revue Neurologique, 15, 688–693.Google Scholar
Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Peretz, I., Babaï, M., Laguitton, V., & Chauvel, P. (1998). Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain, 121, 1853–1867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, J.M. (1995). Some examples of complex meters and their implications for models of metric perception. Music Perception, 13, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A.D., Foxton, J.M., & Griffiths, T.D. (2005). Musically tone deaf individuals have difficulty discriminating intonation contours extracted from speech. Brain and Cognition, 59, 310–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennanen, R.P. (1997). The Development of Chordal Harmony in Greek Rebetika and Laika Music, 1930s to 1960s. British Journal of Ethnomusicology, 6, 65–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, I. (1990). Processing of local and global musical information in unilateral braindamaged patients. Brain, 113, 1185–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I. (2001). Music perception and recognition. In Rapp, B. (Ed.), The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology (pp. 519–540). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. (2001b). The biological foundations of music. In Dupoux, E. (Ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I. (2008). Musical disorders: From behavior to genes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, I., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I., & Hyde, K.L. (2003). What is specific to music processing: Insights from congenital amusia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 362–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. (2005). Brain organization for music processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I., Ayotte, J., Zatorre, R.J., Mehler, J., Ahad, P., & Penhune, V.B. (2002). Congenital amusia: A disorder of fine-grained pitch discrimination. Neuron, 33, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I., Champod, A.S., & Hyde, K. (2003). Varieties of musical disorders, the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 999, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peretz, I., Gosselin, N., Tillmann, B., Cuddy, L.L., Gagnon, B., & Trimmer, C.G. (2008). On-line identification of congenital amusia. Music Perception, 25, 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, I., Kolinsky, R., Tramo, M., Labrecque, R., Hublet, C., Demeurisse, G., & Belleville, S. (1994). Functional dissociations following bilateral lesions of auditory cortex. Brain, 117, 1283–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, G.A. (2008). American idol, Arabic idol: Popular Arabic songs in the classroom. General Music Today, 21, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaug, G. (2005). Neural correlates of congenital amusia. Brain and Cognition, 59, 330–331.Google Scholar
Sloboda, J., Wise, K.J., & Peretz, I. (2005). Quantifying tone deafness in the general population. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1060, 255–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, B. (2000). Music and memory: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, J.S., Hannon, E.E., Large, E.W., & Christiansen, M.H. (2006). Synchronization and continuation tapping to complex meters. Music Perception, 24, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vignolo, L.A. (2003). Music agnosia and auditory agnosia: Dissociations in stroke patients. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zatorre, R. (2005). Music, the food of neuroscience. Nature, 434, 312–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed