Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:05:15.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining treatment for written and spoken naming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2006

PÉLAGIE M. BEESON  and
HEATHER EGNOR
PÉLAGIE M. BEESON
Affiliation:
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
HEATHER EGNOR
Affiliation:
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individuals with left-hemisphere damage often have concomitant impairment of spoken and written language. Whereas some treatment studies have shown that reading paired with spoken naming can benefit both language modalities, little systematic research has been directed toward the treatment of spelling combined with spoken naming. The purpose of this study was to examine the therapeutic effect of pairing a lexical spelling treatment referred to as Copy and Recall Treatment (CART) with verbal repetition of target words. This approach (CART + Repetition) was compared with treatment using verbal repetition without the inclusion of orthographic training (Repetition Only). Two individuals with moderate aphasia and severe impairment of spelling participated in the study using a multiple baseline design across stimulus sets and treatment conditions. Both participants improved spelling of targeted words as well as spoken naming of those items, but improvement in spoken naming was marked for one individual in the CART + Repetition condition, while the other participant made smaller gains in spoken than written naming irrespective of treatment condition. Consideration of the participant profiles suggested that CART + Repetition provides greater benefit when there is some residual phonological ability and the treatment serves to stimulate links between orthography and phonology. (JINS, 2006, 12, 816–827.)

Keywords

AphasiaAgraphiaAnomiaLanguageStrokeRehabilitation
Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 2006 , pp. 816 - 827
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M.P., Friedman, R.B., Loverso, F., & Fischer, R.S. (1992). Lesion localization in phonological agraphia. Brain and Language, 43, 83–95.Google Scholar
Aliminosa, D., McCloskey, M., Goodman-Schulman, R., & Sokol, S. (1993). Remediation of acquired dysgraphia as a technique for testing interpretations of deficits. Aphasiology, 7, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholow, K. (2005). Examining the validity of the Arizona Semantic Test. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Arizona.
Bastiaanse, R., Bosje, M., & Franssen, M. (1996). Deficit-oriented treatment of word-finding problems: Another replication. Aphasiology, 10, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, P.M. (1999). Treating acquired writing impairment: Strengthening graphemic representations. Aphasiology, 13, 367–386.Google Scholar
Beeson, P., Hirsch, F., & Rewega, M. (2002). Successful single-word writing treatment: Experimental analysis of four cases. Aphasiology, 16, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, P.M., Magloire, J., & Robey, R.R. (2005). Letter-by-letter reading: Natural recovery and response to treatment. Behavioural Neurology, 16, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, P.M., Rapcsak, S.Z., Plante, E., Chargualaf, J., Chung, A., Johnson, S.C., & Trouard, T. (2003b). The neural substrates of writing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Aphasiology, 17, 647–665.Google Scholar
Beeson, P., Rising, K., & Volk, J. (2003a). Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1038–1060.Google Scholar
Best, W. & Nickels, L. (2000). From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 231–247.Google Scholar
Binder, J. & Price, C.J. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of language. In R. Cabeza & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 187–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, C. & Howard, D. (1987). Computer generated phonemic cues: An effective aid for naming in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 22, 191–201.Google Scholar
Busk, P.L. & Serlin, R.C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T.R. Kratochwill & J.R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clausen, N.S. & Beeson, P.M. (2003). Conversational use of writing in severe aphasia: A group treatment approach. Aphasiology, 17, 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage, 22, 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeDe, G., Parris, D., & Waters, G. (2003). Teaching self-cues: A treatment approach for verbal naming. Aphasiology, 17, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, R.L. & Thompson, C.K. (1999). Model-based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 972–989.Google Scholar
Ellis, A.W. (1993). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fiez, J. (1997). Phonology, semantics, and the role of the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 79–83.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S., Buerk, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Generalised improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 1087–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, M.L., Beeson, P.M., Stark, A.L., & Rapcsak, S.Z. (2006). The role of left perisylvian cortical regions in spelling. Brain and Language, 99, (in press).Google Scholar
Hillis, A.E. (1989). Efficacy and generalization for aphasic naming errors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 632–636.Google Scholar
Hillis, A.E. & Caramazza, A. (1994). Theories of lexical processing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In M.J. Riddoch & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 449–484). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Holland, A. (1998). A strategy for improving oral naming in an individual with a phonological access impairment. In N. Helm-Estabrooks & A.L. Holland (Eds.), Approaches to the treatment of aphasia (pp. 39–67). San Diego, CA: Singular.
Howard, D. & Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees: A test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Kiran, S. & Thompson, C.K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 773–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolin, D.I. (1984). The neuropsychology of writing and spelling: Semantic, phonological, motor and perceptual processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., Pound, C., White-Thomson, M., & Pring, T. (1990). The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4, 167–184.Google Scholar
Miceli, G., Amitrano, A., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1996). The treatment of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: Analysis of two cases. Brain and Language, 52, 150–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummery, C.J., Patterson, K., Price, C.J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R.S.J., & Hodges, J.R. (2000). A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: Relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory. Annals of Neurology, 47, 36–45.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, K., Honda, M., Hirano, S., Oga, T., Sawamoto, N., Hanakawa, T., Inoue, H., Ito, J., Matsuda, T., Fukuyama, H., & Shibasaki, H. (2002). Modulation of the visual word retrieval system in writing: A functional MRI study on the Japanese orthographies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, L. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 155–182.Google Scholar
Nickels, L. & Best, W. (1996). Therapy for naming deficits (part II): Specifics, surprises, and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10, 109–136.Google Scholar
Omura, K., Tsukamoto, T., Kotani, Y., Ohgami, Y., & Yoshikawa, K. (2004). Neural correlates of phoneme-to-grapheme conversion. Neuroreport, 15, 949–953.Google Scholar
Rapcsak, S.Z. & Beeson, P.M. (2002). Neuroanatomical correlates of spelling and writing. In A.E. Hillis (Ed.), Handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation (pp. 71–99). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Rapcsak, S.Z. & Beeson, P.M. (2004). The role of left posterior inferior temporal cortex in spelling. Neurology, 62, 2221–2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, B., Benzig, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive neuropsychology, 14, 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J.C. (1976). Coloured progressive matrices. London: H.K. Lewis.
Robey, R.R. & Schultz, M.C. (1998). A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: An adaptation for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology, 12, 787–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robey, R.R., Schultz, M.C., & Crawford, A.B. (1999). Single-subject clinical outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analysis. Aphasiology, 13, 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, J., Marshall, J., Chiat, S., & Pring, T. (2001). Enhancing communication in jargon aphasia: A small group study of writing therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeltgen, D.P., Sevush, S., & Heilman, K.M. (1983). Phonological agraphia: Writing by the lexical-semantic route. Neurology, 33, 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorden, C. & Brett, M. (2000). Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioural Neurology, 12, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugishita, M., Seki, K., Kabe, S., & Yunoki, K. (1993). A material-control single-case study of the efficacy of treatment for written and oral naming difficulties. Neuropsychologia, 31, 559–569.Google Scholar
Tainturier, M.-J. & Rapp, B. (2001). The spelling process. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Vandenberghe, R., Price, C., Wise, R., Josephs, O., & Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1996). Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures. Nature, 383, 254–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar