Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:55:11.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workers' risk of unemployment after traumatic brain injury: A normed comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2005

J.N. DOCTOR
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Education & Biomedical Informatics (MEBI), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
J. CASTRO
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Education & Biomedical Informatics (MEBI), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
N.R. TEMKIN
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
R.T. FRASER
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Washington
J.E. MACHAMER
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
S.S. DIKMEN
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

We examined, among those persons working preinjury, the risk of unemployment 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI) relative to expected risk of unemployment for the sample under a validated risk-adjusted econometric model of employment in the U.S. population. Results indicate that 42% of TBI cases were unemployed versus 9% expected, relative risk (RR) = 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) (4.12, 4.95). The relative risk for unemployment was higher among males, those with higher education, persons with more severe injuries, and more impaired early neuropsychological or functional status. Difference in unemployment rates gave similar results for gender, severity of injury, and early neuropsychological and functional status. However, for education, the excess was smaller among those more highly educated, but the unemployment rate in the more highly educated in the general population was sufficiently small to yield a larger relative risk. In conclusion, after accounting for underlying risk of unemployment in the general population, unemployment is substantially higher after TBI for people who were employed when they were injured. The differential employment status varies depending on demographics, severity of brain injury, early functional outcome, and neurobehavioral indicators. For characteristics such as education, associated with rates of unemployment in the general population, different methods used to compare the rates may yield different results. (JINS, 2005, 11, 747–752.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armitage, P. (1971). Statistical Methods in Medical Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Army Individual Test Battery (1944). Manual of Directions and Scoring. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General's Office.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2002). The current population survey: Design and methodology. Technical Paper 63RV. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Cattelani, R., Tanzi, F., Lombardi, F., & Mazzucchi, A. (2002). Competitive re-employment after severe traumatic brain injury: Clinical, cognitive and behavioural predictive variables. Brain Injury, 16, 5164.Google Scholar
Cifu, D.X., Keyser-Marcus, L., Lopez, E., Wehman, P., Kreutzer, J.S., Englander, J., & High, W. (1997). Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 78, 125131.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S.S., Machamer, J.E., Winn, H.R., Anderson, G.D., & Temkin, N.R. (2000). Neuropsychological effects of valproate in traumatic brain injury: A randomized trial. Neurology, 54, 895902.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S.S. & Morgan, S.F. (1980). Neuropsychological factors relating to employability and occupational status in persons with epilepsy. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 168, 236240.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S.S., Temkin, N.R., Machamer, J.E., Holubkov, A.L., Fraser, R.T., & Winn, H.R. (1994). Employment following traumatic head injuries. Archives of Neurology, 51, 177186.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S.S., Temkin, N.R., Miller, B., Machamer, J., & Winn, H.R. (1991). Neurobehavioral effects of phenytoin prophylaxis of posttraumatic seizures. JAMA, 265, 12711277.Google Scholar
Felmingham, K.L., Baguley, I.J., & Crooks, J. (2001). A comparison of acute and postdischarge predictors of employment 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82, 435439.Google Scholar
Fraser, R.T., Clemmons, D., Trejo, W., & Temkin, N. (1986). The difficult to employ in epilepsy rehabilitation: Predelictions of response to an intensive intervention. Epilepsea, 27, 220224.Google Scholar
Fraser, R.T. & Wehman, P. (1994). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Issues in vocational outcome. Neurorehabilitation, 5, 3948.Google Scholar
Jennett, B. & Bond, M. (1975). Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet, 1, 480484.Google Scholar
Keyser-Marcus, L.A., Bricout, J.C., Wehman, P., Campbell, L.R., Cifu, D.X., Englander, J., High, W., & Zafonte, R.D. (2002). Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83, 635641.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.F., Schwab, K.A., Salazar, A.M., & Brown, H.R. (1993). Occupational and educational achievements of head injured Vietnam veterans at 15-year follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 596601.Google Scholar
Millimet, D.L., Nieswiadomy, M., Ryu, H., & Slottje, D. (2003). Estimating worklife expectancies: An econometric approach. Journal of Econometrics, 113, 83113.Google Scholar
Ruff, R.M., Marshall, L.F., Crouch, J., Klauber, M.R., Levin, H.S., Barth, J., Kreutzer, J., Blunt, B.A., Foulkes, M.A., & Eisenberg, H.M. (1993). Predictors of outcome following severe head trauma: Follow-up data from the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Brain Injury, 7, 101111.Google Scholar
Sherer, M., Sander, A.M., Nick, T.G., High, W.M., Malec, J.F., & Rosenthal, M. (2002). Early cognitive status and productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury: Findings from the TBI model systems. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83, 183192.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G. & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 8184.Google Scholar
Temkin, N.R., Dikmen, S.S., Anderson, G.D., Wilensky, A.J., Holmes, M.D., Cohen, W., Newell, D.W., Nelson, P., Awan, A., & Winn, H.R. (1999). Valproate therapy for prevention of posttraumatic seizures: A randomized trial. Journal of Neurosurgery, 91, 593600.Google Scholar
Temkin, N.R., Dikmen, S.S., Wilensky, A.J., Keihm, J., Chabal, S., & Winn, H.R. (1990). A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. New England Journal of Medicine, 323, 497502.Google Scholar
Temkin, N.R., Holubkov, R., Machamer, J.E., Winn, H.R., & Dikmen, S.S. (1995). Classification and regression trees (CART) for prediction of function at 1 year following head trauma. Journal of Neurosurgery, 82, 764771.Google Scholar
Wagner, A.K., Hammond, F.M., Sasser, H.C., & Wiercisiewski, D. (2002). Return to productive activity after traumatic brain injury: Relationship with measures of disability, handicap, and community integration. Archives of Physical & Medical Rehabilitation, 83, 107114.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.