Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:49:28.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index to Predict Treatment Group Attendance in Patients with Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Raeanne C. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
Taylor Davine
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
Alexandrea L. Harmell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, University of California, San Diego/San Diego State University, San Diego, California
Veronica Cardenas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
Barton W. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
Brent T. Mausbach*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Brent T. Mausbach, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive; La Jolla, CA, 92093-0993. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In a psychosocial treatment study, knowing which participants are likely to put forth adequate effort to maximize their treatment, such as attending group sessions and completing homework assignments, and knowing which participants need additional motivation before engagement in treatment is a crucial component to treatment success. This study examined the ability of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Effort Index (EI), a newly developed measure of suboptimal effort that is embedded within the RBANS, to predict group attendance in a sample of 128 middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia. This study was the first to evaluate the EI with a schizophrenia sample. While the EI literature recommends a cutoff score of >3 to be considered indicative of poor effort, a cutoff of >4 was identified as the optimal cutoff for this sample. Receiver Operating Characteristics curve analyses were conducted to determine if the EI could predict participants who had high versus low attendance. Results indicated that the EI was successfully able to discriminate between group attendance, and this measure of effort appears to be most valuable as a tool to identify participants who will have high attendance. Of interest, overall cognitive functioning and symptoms of psychopathology were not predictive of group attendance. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–8)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addington, D., Addington, J. (1990). A depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophrenia Research, 3, 247251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Armistead-Jehle, P., Hansen, C.L. (2011). Comparison of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Index and stand-alone symptom validity tests in a military sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(7), 592601.Google Scholar
Baekeland, F., Lundwall, L. (1975). Dropping out of treatment: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 738783.Google Scholar
Barker, M.D., Horner, M.D., Bachman, D.L. (2010). Embedded indices of effort in the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) in a geriatric sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(6), 10641077.Google Scholar
Bellack, A.S. (2004). Skills training for people with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitiation Journal, 27(4), 375391.Google Scholar
Bianchini, K., Mathias, C., Greve, K. (2001). Symptom validity testing: A critical review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(1), 1945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardenas, V., Abel, S., Bowie, C., Tiznado, D., Depp, C.A., Patterson, T.L., Mausbach, B.T. (2012). When functional capacity and real-world functioning converge: The role of self-efficacy. Schizophrenia Bulletin. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs004 [Epub ahead of print].Google ScholarPubMed
Depp, C.A., Mausbach, B.T., Granholm, E., Cardenas, V., Ben-Zeev, D., Patterson, T.L., Jeste, D.V. (2010). Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: Design and preliminary data from three approaches. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(10), 715721.Google Scholar
Duff, K., Spering, C.C., O'Bryant, S.E., Beglinger, L.J., Moser, D.J., Bayless, J.D., Scott, J.G. (2011). The RBANS Effort Index: Base rates in geriatric samples. Applied Neuropsychology, 18(1), 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, A. (2005). The impact of cognitive and psychiatric impairment of psychotic disorders on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Assessment, 12(2), 123129.Google Scholar
Faust, D., Guilmette, T., Hart, K., Arkes, H., Fishburne, F., Davey, L. (1988). Neuropsychologists’ training, experience, and judgment accuracy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3(2), 145163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fluss, R., Faraggi, D., Reiser, B. (2005). Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biometrical Journal, 47(4), 458472. doi:10.1002/bimj.200410135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foussias, G., Mann, S., Zakzanis, K.K., van Reekum, R., Remington, G. (2009). Motivational deficits as the central link to functioning in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Schizophrenia Research, 115(2–3), 333337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gierok, S.D., Dickson, A.L., Cole, J.A. (2005). Performance of forensic and non-forensic adult psychiatric inpatients on the Test of Memory Malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(6), 755760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, J.M., Queern, C., Iannone, V.N., Buchanan, R.W. (1999). Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia I: Sensitivity, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(12), 19441950.Google Scholar
Gontkovsky, S.T., Beatty, W.W., Mold, J.W. (2004). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in a Normal, Geriatric Sample. Clinical Gerontologist, 27(3), 7986.Google Scholar
Gorissen, M., Sanz, J.C., Schmand, B. (2005). Effort and cognition in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research, 2–3(199–208).Google Scholar
Granholm, E., Holden, J., Link, P.C., McQuaid, J.R., Jeste, D.V. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for older consumers with schizophrenia: Defeatist performance attitudes and functional outcome. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P., Lees-Haley, L.M., Allen, L.M. (2002). The Word Memory Test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Brain Injury, 15, 10451060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiffenstein, M.F., Baker, J.W., Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218224.Google Scholar
Harding, B., Torres-Harding, S., Bond, G.R., Salyers, M.P., Rollins, A.L., Hardin, T. (2008). Factors associated with early attrition from psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 44(4), 283288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heaton, R.K., Smith, H., Lehman, R., Vogt, A. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 892900.Google Scholar
Hobart, M.P., Golberg, R., Bartko, J.J., Gold, J.M. (1999). Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(12), 19511957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hook, J.N., Marquine, M.J., Hoelzle, J.B. (2009). Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort index performance in a medically ill geriatric sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(3), 231235.Google Scholar
Jeste, D.V., Palmer, B.W., Appelbaum, P.S., Golshan, S., Glorioso, D., Dunn, L.B., Kraemer, H.C. (2007). A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(8), 966974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, S., Fiszbein, A., Lewis, O.A. (1987). The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13(2), 261276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazantzis, N., Deane, F.P., Ronan, K.P. (2000). Homework assignments in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(2), 189202.Google Scholar
Kertzman, S., Grinspan, H., Birger, M., Shliapnikov, N., Alish, Y., Ben Nahum, Z., Kotler, M. (2006). Simple real-time computerized tasks for detection of malingering among murderers with schizophrenia. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 43(2), 112118.Google Scholar
Konstantakopoulos, G., Ploumpidis, D., Oulis, P., Patrikelis, P., Soumani, A., Papadimitriou, G.N., Politis, A.M. (2011). Apathy, cognitive deficits and functional impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 133(1–3), 193198.Google Scholar
Loong, T. (2003). Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 327, 716719. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.716Google Scholar
Mass, R., Schoemig, T., Hitschfeld, K., Wall, E., Haasen, C. (2000). Psychopathological syndromes of schizophrenia: Evaluation of the dimensional structure of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 167177.Google Scholar
Mausbach, B.T., Moore, R.C., Roesch, S., Cardenas, V., Patterson, T.L. (2010). The relationship between homework compliance and therapy outcomes: An updated meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(5), 429438.Google Scholar
O'Mahar, K.M., Duff, K., Scott, J.G., Linck, J.F., Adams, R.L., Mold, J.W. (2012). Brief report: The temporal stability of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status effort index in geriatric samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(1), 114118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, T.L., Mausbach, B.T., McKibbin, C., Bucardo, J., Jeste, D.V., Goldman, S. (2006). Functional Adaptation Skills Training (FAST): A randomized trial of a psychosocial intervention for middle-aged and older patients with chronic psychotic disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 86(1), 291299.Google Scholar
Patterson, T.L., McKibbin, C.L., Taylor, M., Goldman, S., Davila-Fraga, W., Bucardo, J., Jeste, D.V. (2003). Functional adaptation skills training (FAST): A pilot psychosocial intervention study in middle-aged and older patients with chronic psychotic disorders. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11(1), 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, D., Mueser, K. (1996). Research update on the psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 153(5), 607617.Google Scholar
Randolph, C. (1998). Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google ScholarPubMed
Reardon, M.L., Cubkrowicz, K.C., Reeves, M.D., Joiner, T.E. (2002). Duration and regularity of thearpy attendance as predictors of treatment outcome in an adult outpatient population. Psychotherapy Research, 12(3), 273285.Google Scholar
Silverberg, N.D., Wertheimer, J.C., Fichtenberg, N.L. (2007). An Effort Index for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(5), 841854.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, T.N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Incorporated.Google Scholar
Young, J.C., Baughman, B.C., Roper, B.L. (2012). Validation of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status-effort index in a veteran sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(4), 688699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar