Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:55:28.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability of a novel paradigm for determining hemispheric lateralization of visuospatial function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

ANDREW J. O. WHITEHOUSE ,
NICHOLAS BADCOCK ,
MARGRIET A. GROEN  and
DOROTHY V. M. BISHOP
ANDREW J. O. WHITEHOUSE*
Affiliation:
Center for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Neurocognitive Development Unit, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
NICHOLAS BADCOCK
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
MARGRIET A. GROEN
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
DOROTHY V. M. BISHOP
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests: Dr. Andrew Whitehouse, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Center for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, 100 Roberts Road, Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In most individuals, language production and visuospatial skills are subserved predominantly by the left and right hemispheres, respectively. Functional Transcranial Doppler (fTCD) provides a noninvasive and relatively low-cost method for measuring functional lateralization. However, while the silent word generation task provides an accurate and reliable paradigm for investigating lateralization of language production, there is no comparable gold-standard method for measuring visuospatial skills. Thirty undergraduate students (19 females) completed a task of spatial memory while undergoing fTCD recording. Participants completed this task at two different time points, separated by between 26 to 155 days. The relative activation between hemispheres averaged across all participants was found to be consistent across testing sessions. This was observed at the individual level also, with a quantitative index of lateralization showing high reproducibility. These findings indicate that the use of the spatial memory task with fTCD is a robust methodology for examining laterality of visuospatial skills. (JINS, 2009, 15, 1028–1032.)

Keywords

Cerebral lateralizationVisuospatialFunctional transcranial Doppler ultrasonographyReliabilityReproducibilitySpatial memory
Type
Brief Communications
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 1028 - 1032
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryden, M., Hécaen, M., & DeAgostini, M. (1983). Patterns of cerebral organization. Brain and Language, 20, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulla-Hellwig, M., Vollmer, J., Gotzen, A., Skreczek, W., & Hartje, W. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetry of arterial blood flow velocity changes during verbal and visuospatial tasks. Neuropsychologia, 34, 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deppe, M., Knecht, S., Henningsen, H., & Ringelstein, E.B. (1997). AVERAGE: A Windows program for automated analysis of event-related cerebral blood flow. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 75, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deppe, M., Knecht, S., Papke, K., Lohmann, H., Fleischer, H., Heindel, W., et al. (2000). Assessment of hemispheric language lateralization: A comparison between fMRI and fTCD. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 20, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorst, J., Haag, A., Knake, S., Oertel, W.H., Hamer, H.M., & Rosenow, F. (2008). Functional transcranial Doppler sonography and a spatial orientation paradigm identify the non-dominant hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 68, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragovic, M., & Hammond, G. (2005). Handedness in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of evidence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 111, 410–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flöel, A., Buyx, A., Brietenstein, C., Lohmann, H., & Knecht, S. (2005). Hemispheric lateralization of spatial attention in right- and left-hemispheric language dominance. Behavioral Brain Research, 158, 269–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flöel, A., Lohmann, H., Breitenstein, C., Dräger, B., Buyx, A., Henningsen, H., et al. (2002). Reproducibility of hemispheric blood flow increases during line bisectioning. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 917–924.Google Scholar
Frackowiak, R.S.J. (1997), The cerebral basis of functional recovery. In Frackowiak, R.S.J., Friston, K.J., Frith, C.D., Dolan, R.J. & Mazziotta, J.C. (Eds.), Human brain function (pp. 275–299). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hartje, W., Ringelstein, E.B., Kistinger, B., Fabianek, D., & Willmes, K. (1994). Transcranial Doppler ultrasonic assessment of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity changes during verbal and visuospatial cognitive tasks. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1443–1452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illingworth, S., & Bishop, D.V.M. (in press). Atypical cerebral lateralisation in adults with developmental dyslexia demonstrated using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Brain and Language.Google Scholar
Knecht, S., Deppe, M., Ebner, A., Henningsen, H., Huber, T., Jokeit, H., et al. (1998). Noninvasive determination of language lateralization by functional transcranial Doppler sonography: A comparison with the Wada test. Stroke, 29, 82–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knecht, S., Deppe, M., Ringelstein, E.-B., Wirtz, M., Lohmann, H., Dräger, B., et al. (1998). Reproducibility of functional transcranial Doppler sonography in determining hemispheric language lateralization. Stroke, 29, 1155–1159.Google ScholarPubMed
Loring, D.W., Meador, K.J., Lee, G.P., & King, D.W. (1992). Amobarbital effects and lateralized brain function: The Wada Test. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 53–59.Google Scholar
Serrati, C., Finocchi, C., Calautti, C., Bruzzone, G.L., Colucci, M., Gandolfo, C., et al. (2000). Absence of hemispheric dominance for mental rotation ability: A transcranial Doppler study. Cortex, 36, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R.A. (1996). Dissociating spatial and verbal working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, J., & Rasmussen, T. (1960). Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Journal of Neurosurgery, 17, 266–282.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, A.J.O., & Bishop, D.V.M. (2008). Cerebral dominance for language function in adults with specific language impairment or autism. Brain, 131, 3193–3200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, A.J.O., & Bishop, D.V.M. (2009). Hemispheric division of function is the result of independent probabilistic biases. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1938–1943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed