Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:12:32.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between Environmental Dependency and Closing-in in Patients with Fronto-temporal Dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2014

Dario Grossi ,
Natascia De Lucia ,
Graziella Milan  and
Luigi Trojano
Dario Grossi
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Natascia De Lucia
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Graziella Milan
Affiliation:
Geriatric Centre Frullone ASL NA/1, Naples, Italy
Luigi Trojano*
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Rehabilitation Institute of Telese Terme (BN), Italy
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Luigi Trojano, Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Viale Ellittico 31, 81100 Caserta, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Environmental dependency (ED) phenomena, including utilization behavior and imitation behavior, are clinical manifestations typically observed in patients with the behavioral variant of fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD), who may also show the closing-in (CI) phenomenon. Here, we explored the neuropsychological correlates of ED and CI in bvFTD, and the association of ED with CI to clarify the mechanisms underlying these clinical manifestations. Thirty-one bvFTD patients underwent a wide cognitive assessment in addition to special tasks to detect occurrence of CI and ED phenomena. Both ED and CI phenomena were present in more than half of the sample. Logistic regression analyses revealed that both ED and CI phenomena were significantly associated with poor scores on frontal neuropsychological tests. Although ED and CI often co-occurred, 3/12 patients with CI did not show ED, and 5/18 patients with ED did not show CI. A logistic regression model showed that the presence of ED was not significantly associated to CI. CI and ED are associated to progressive derangement of frontal functions in bvFTD. However, specific frontal dysfunctions might explain the occurrence of either phenomenon in isolation. (JINS, 2015, 21, 1–7)

Keywords

Utilization behaviorImitation behaviorclosing-inFronto-temporal dementiaEnvironmental dependencyFrontal defects
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambron, E., Allaria, F., McIntosh, R.D., & Della Sala, S. (2009). Closing-in behaviour in fronto-temporal dementia. Journal of Neurology, 256, 1004–1006. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5027-4 Google Scholar
Appollonio, I., Leone, M., Isella, V., Piamarta, F., Consoli, T., Villa, M.L., & Nichelli, P. (2005). The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurological Sciences, 26, 108–116. doi:10.1007/s10072-005-0443-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, K.J., & Lemeshow, S. (2006). Goodness-of-fit test for a logistic regression model fitted using survey sample data. The Stata Journal, 6, 97–105.Google Scholar
Besnard, J., Allain, P., Aubin, G., Chauviré, V., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., & Le Gall, D. (2011). A contribution to the study of environmental dependency phenomena: The social hypothesis. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3279–3294. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2005). Statistics review 14: Logistic regression. Critical Care, 9, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, S.J., Wolpert, D.M., & Frith, C.D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 237–242.Google Scholar
Caffarra, P., Vezzadini, G., Dieci, F., Zonato, F., & Venneri, A. (2002). Rey–Osterrieth complex figure: Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurological Sciences, 22, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlesimo, G.A., Caltagirone, C., Gainotti, G., & the group of the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. (1996). The mental deterioration battery: Normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. European Neurology, 36, 378–384.Google Scholar
Conson, M., Salzano, S., Manzo, V., Grossi, D., & Trojano, L. (2009). Closing-in without severe drawing disorders: The “fatal” consequences of pathological attraction. Cortex, 45, 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.11.013 Google Scholar
Cummings, J.L., & Miller, B.L. (2007). Conceptual and clinical aspects of the frontal lobes. In B.L. Miller & J.L. Cummings (Eds), The human frontal lobes: Functions and disorders (pp. 12–24, 2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
De Lucia, N., Grossi, D., Fasanaro, A.M., Carpi, S., & Trojano, L. (2013). Frontal defects contribute to the genesis of closing-in in Alzheimer’s Disease patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Societies, 19, 1–7. doi:10.1017/S1355617713000568 Google Scholar
De Lucia, N., Grossi, D., & Trojano, L. (2014). The genesis of closing-in in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: A comparative clinic and experimental study. Neuropsychology, 28, 312–318. doi:10.1037/neu0000036 Google Scholar
De Renzi, E., Cavalleri, F., & Facchini, S. (1996). Imitation and utilization behaviour. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, 61, 396–400.Google Scholar
Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., & Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: A Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology, 55, 1621–1626. doi:10.1212/wnl.55.11.1621 Google Scholar
Frith, C.D., Blakemore, S.J., & Wolpert, D.M. (2000). Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B Biological Sciences, 355, 1771–1788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gainotti, G. (1972). A qualitative study of the closing-in symptom in normal children and in brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 10, 429–436.Google Scholar
Gasparini, M., Masciarelli, G., Vanacore, N., Ottaviani, D., Salati, E., Talarico, G., & Bruno, G. (2008). A descriptive study on constructional impairment in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 15, 589–597. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02128.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A., Dutt, A., Bhargava, P., & Snowden, J. (2013). Environmental dependency behaviours in frontotemporal dementia: Have we been underrating them? Journal of Neurology, 260, 861–868. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6722-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhermitte, F. (1983). “Utilization behavior” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lhermitte, F. (1984). Autonomie de l’homme et lobe frontal. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Medécine, 168, 224–248.Google Scholar
Lee, B.H., Chin, J., Kang, S.J., Kim, E.J., Park, K.C., & Na, D.L. (2004). Mechanism of the closing-in phenomenon in a figure coping task in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Neurocase, 10, 393–397. doi:10.1080/13554790490892194 Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1935). Some observations on apraxia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 28, 63–72.Google Scholar
Measso, G., Cavarzeran, F., Zappalà, G., Lebowitz, B.D., Crook, T.H., Pirozzolo, F.J., & Grigoletto, F. (1993). The Mini-Mental State Examination: Normative study of an Italian random sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9, 77–85. doi:10.1080/87565649109540545 Google Scholar
Mondini, S., Mapelli, D., Vestri, A., & Bisiacchi, P.S. (2003). Esame Neuropsicologico Breve. Milan, MI: Cortina Editor.Google Scholar
Neary, D., Snowden, J.S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., & Benson, D.F. (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51, 1546–1554.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research (pp. 1–18). New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Sagliano, L., D’Olimpio, F., Conson, M., Cappuccio, A., Grossi, D., & Trojano, L. (2013). Inducing closing-in phenomenon in healthy young adults: The effect of dual task and stimulus complexity on drawing performance. Experimental Brain Research, 225, 409–418. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3381-4 Google Scholar
Serra, L., Fadda, L., Perri, R., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G.A. (2010). The closing-in phenomenon in the drawing performance of Alzheimer’s disease patients: A compensation account. Cortex, 46, 1031–1036. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.010 Google Scholar
Shallice, T., Burgess, P., Schon, P., & Baxter, D.M. (1989). The origins of utilization behaviour. Brain, 112, 1587–1598.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J.A., & Decety, J. (2006). Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomin Bulletin & Review, 13, 179–200.Google Scholar
Spinnler, H., & Tognoni, G. (1987). Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di tests neuropsicologici. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 6, 8–96.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., & Levine, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 401–433.Google Scholar
Tuokko, H., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Rae, S., & O’Rourke, N. (2000). A comparison of alternative approaches to the scoring of clock drawing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 137–148.Google Scholar
von Gunten, A., & Duc, R. (2007). Subtle imitation behaviour in convenience samples of normal, demented, and currently depressed elderly subjects. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 568–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed