Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:25:11.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Qualitative features of finger movement during the Halstead finger oscillation test following traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2020

Prigatano George P.  and
Borgaro Susan R.
Prigatano George P.*
Affiliation:
Section of Neuropsychology, Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
Borgaro Susan R.
Affiliation:
Section of Neuropsychology, Division of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
*
Reprint requests to: George P. Prigatano, Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 West Thomas Road; Phoenix, AZ 85013-4496. E-mail address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative performance on the Halstead Finger Tapping test may help differentiate brain dysfunctional patients from normal controls. “Normal” and “abnormal” finger tapping patterns during this task have been characterized and illustrated pictorially. Data from 65 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 15 normal controls support the dual proposition that (1) abnormal finger tapping patterns are more commonly observed in TBI patients than in controls and (2) the frequency of abnormal finger movements may relate to the severity of TBI during the acute stages after trauma. Future prospective studies are needed to replicate these findings. (JINS, 2003, 9, 128–133.)

Keywords

Finger tappingSpeedAbnormal patternsTBI
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 128 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dikmen, S.S., Machamer, J.E., Winn, H.R., & Temkin, N.R. (1995). Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology, 9, 80–90.10.1037/0894-4105.9.1.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuster, J.M. (1997). The prefrontal cortex. Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.Google Scholar
Haaland, K.Y., Temkin, N., Randahl, G., & Dikmen, S. (1994). Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 448–456.10.1080/01688639408402655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halstead, W.C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heilman, K. & Gonzalez Rothi, L. (1993). Apraxia. In K. Heilman & E. Valenstine (Eds.). Clinical neuropsychology (3rd ed. pp. 141–163). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jennett, B. & Teasdale, G. (1974). Management of head injuries. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.C., Pinkston, J.B., Bigler, E.D., & Blatter, D.D. (1996). Corpus callosum morphology in normal controls and traumatic brain injury: Sex differences, mechanisms of injury, and neuropsychological correlates. Neuropsychology, 10, 408–415.10.1037/0894-4105.10.3.408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.C. & Prigatano, G.P. (2000). Functional MR imaging during finger tapping. BNI Quarterly, 16, 155–158.Google Scholar
Levin, H.S., Gary, H.E., Eisenberg, H.M., Ruff, R.M., Barth, J.T., Kreutzer, J., High, W.M., Portman, S., Foulkes, M.A., Jane, J.A., Marmarou, A., & Marshall, L.F. (1990). Neurobehavioral outcome 1 year after severe head injury: Experience of the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Journal of Neurosurgery, 73, 699–709.10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. (1999a). Impaired awareness, finger tapping, and rehabilitation outcome after brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44, 145–159.10.1037/0090-5550.44.2.145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. (1999b). Principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prigatano, G.P., Amin, K., & Rosenstein, L.D. (1995). Manual for the BNI screen for higher cerebral functions. Phoenix: Barrow Neurological Institute.Google Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. & Hoffman, B. (1997). Finger tapping and brain dysfunction: A qualitative and quantitative study. BNI Quarterly, 13, 14–18.Google Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. & Parsons, O.A. (1976). Relationship of age and education to Halstead Test performance in different patient populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 527–533.10.1037/0022-006X.44.4.527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. & Wong, J.L. (1997). Speed of finger tapping and goal attainment after unilateral cerebral vascular accident. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 847–852.10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90198-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitan, R.M. (1955). Manual for administration of neuropsychological test batteries for adults and children. Indianapolis: Indiana University Medical Center.Google Scholar
Reitan, R. & Wolfson, D. (1994). Dissociation of motor impairment and higher-level brain deficits in strokes and cerebral neoplasms. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 193–208.10.1080/13854049408401557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega, A.Jr. & Parsons, O.A. (1967). Cross-validation of the Halstead Reitan tests for brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 619–625.10.1037/h0025112CrossRefGoogle Scholar