Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:28:57.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planful versus Avoidant Coping: Behavior of Individuals With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury During a Psychosocial Stress Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2010

Katherine M. Krpan ,
Donald T. Stuss  and
Nicole D. Anderson
Katherine M. Krpan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Donald T. Stuss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Faculty of Medicine (Neurology, Rehabilitation Science), University of Toronto, Canada
Nicole D. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Faculty of Medicine (Psychiatry), University of Toronto, Canada
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Nicole D. Anderson, KLARU at Baycrest, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M6A 2E1. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many people who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have poor psychosocial outcomes that have been related to the use of avoidant coping. A major obstacle to understanding the mechanisms of this relationship are the self-report measures by which coping has been traditionally evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to compare coping behavior during a simulated real-world stress test with self-reported coping. People with moderate-to-severe TBI and matched controls completed the Baycrest Psychosocial Stress Test (BPST) where coping behavior was evaluated, and also completed the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WOC). While there were no group differences in self- or significant-other-reported behavior on the WOC, the TBI group engaged in more avoidant than planful behavior on the BPST, while the control group displayed the opposite pattern of behavior. Moreover, in the control group there were positive relations between behavior on the BPST and self-reported coping on the WOC, but no such relation within the TBI group. Secondary analyses allowed for TBI participants to be characterized as “planners” or “avoiders.” This is the first study, to our knowledge, to report behavioral differences in coping post-TBI. Future work investigating the moderators of these differences may have significant implications for rehabilitative intervention. (JINS, 2011, 17, 248–255)

Keywords

Traumatic brain injuryCopingStressMethodsAdjustmentRehabilitation
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 28 February 2011 , pp. 248 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anson, K., Ponsford, J. (2006a). Coping and emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21(3), 248–259.Google Scholar
Anson, K., Ponsford, J. (2006b). Evaluation of coping skills group following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(2), 167–178.Google Scholar
Anson, K., Ponsford, J. (2006c). Who benefits? Outcome following a coping skills group intervention for traumatically brain injured individuals. Brain Injury, 20(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicerone, K.D., Azulay, J. (2007). Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 22(5), 257–266.Google Scholar
Cicerone, K., Levin, H., Malec, J., Stuss, D., Whyte, J. (2006). Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: Moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1212–1222.Google Scholar
Curran, C.A., Ponsford, J.L., Crowe, S. (2000). Coping strategies and emotional outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison with orthopaedic patients. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(6), 1256–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, D.R., Cantanzaro, A.M., Firestone, J., Schwartz, M., Stuss, D.T. (2006). Changes in coping style following traumatic brain injury and their relationship to productivity status. Brain and Cognition, 60(2), 214–216.Google Scholar
Dawson, D.R., Levine, B., Schwartz, M.L., Stuss, D.T. (2004). Acute predictors of real-world outcomes following traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. Brain Injury, 18(3), 221–238.Google Scholar
Dawson, M.E., Schell, A.M., Filion, D.L. (1990). The electrodermal system. In J.T. Cacioppo & L.G. Tassinary (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social and inferential elements (pp. 295–324). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, D.R., Schwartz, M.L., Winocur, G., Stuss, D.T. (2007). Return to productivity following traumatic brain injury: Cognitive, psychological, physical, spiritual, and environmental correlates. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 310–313.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S.S., Machamer, J.E., Powell, J.M., Temkin, N.R. (2003). Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 84(10), 1449–1457.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S., Ross, B.L., Machamer, J.E., Temkin, N.R. (1995). One year psychosocial outcome in head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1(1), 67–77.Google Scholar
Finset, A., Andersson, S. (2000). Coping strategies in patients with acquired brain injury: The relationships between coping, apathy, depression and lesion location. Brain Injury, 14(10), 887–905.Google Scholar
Finset, A., Dyrnes, S., Krogstad, J.M., Berstad, J. (1995). Self-reported social networks and interpersonal support 2 years after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9(2), 141–150.Google Scholar
Fleming, A.S., Steiner, M., Corter, C. (1997). Cortisol, hedonics, and maternal resposivness in human mothers. Hormones and Behavior, 32(2), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. (1988). Ways of coping questionnaire manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Green, R.E., Colella, B., Christensen, B., Johns, K., Frasca, D., Bayley, M., Monette, G. (2008). Examining moderators of cognitive recovery trajectories after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 89(12 Suppl), S16–S24.Google Scholar
Green, R.E., Colella, B., Hebert, D.A., Bayley, M., Kang, H.S., Till, C., Monette, G. (2008). Prediction of return to productivity after severe traumatic brain injury: Investigations of optimal neuropsychological tests and timing of assessment. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 89(12 Suppl), S51–S60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.M., Hellhammer, D.H. (1993). The Trier Social Stress Test – A tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81.Google Scholar
Krpan, K.M., Coombs, R., Zinga, D., Steiner, M., Fleming, A.S. (2005). Experiential and hormonal correlates of maternal behavior in teen and adult mothers. Hormones and Behavior, 47(1), 112–122.Google Scholar
Krpan, K.M., Levine, B., Stuss, D.T., Dawson, D.R. (2007). Executive function and coping at one-year-post traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 36–46.Google Scholar
Langlois, J.A., Rutland-Brown, W., Thomas, K.E. (October 2004). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Levine, B., Turner, G.R., Stuss, D.T. (2008). Rehabilitation o frontal lobe functions. In D.T. Stuss, G. Winocur, & I.H. Robertson (Eds.), Cognitive neurorehabilitation: 2nd Edition: Evidence and application (pp. 464–486). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mateer, C.A., Sira, C.S. (2006). Cognitive and emotional consequences of TBI: intervention strategies for vocational rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 21(4), 315–326.Google Scholar
O'Keeffe, F.M., Dockree, P.M., Robertson, I.H. (2004). Poor insight in traumatic brain injury mediated by impaired error processing? Evidence from electrodermal activity. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(1), 101–120.Google Scholar
Prigatano, G.P. (2005). Disturbances of self-awareness of deficit after traumatic brain injury. In G.P. Prigatano & D.L. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury (pp. 111–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D. (1983). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T. (1991). Disturbance of self-awareness of deficit after brain injury. In G.P. Prigatano & D. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury (pp. 63–83). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., Ely, P., Hugenholtz, H., Richard, M.T., LaRochelle, S., Poirier, C.A., Bell, I. (1985). Subtle neuropsychological deficits in patients with good recovery after closed head injury. Neurosurgery, 17(1), 41–47.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., Gow, C.A. (1992). ‘Frontal dysfunction’ after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 5(4), 272–282.Google Scholar
Whelan-Goodinson, R., Ponsford, J., Johnston, L., Grant, F. (2009). Psychiatric disorders following traumatic brain injury: Their nature and frequency. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(5), 324–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, R.L., Rutterford, N.A. (2006). Demographic and cognitive predictors of long-term psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(3), 350–358.Google Scholar
Zachary, R.A. (1982). Shipley institute of living scale, revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar