Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:42:18.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring executive dysfunction in an acute rehabilitation setting: Using the dysexecutive questionnaire (DEX)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

PAULEEN C. BENNETT ,
BEN ONG  and
JENNIE PONSFORD
PAULEEN C. BENNETT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
BEN ONG
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
JENNIE PONSFORD
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is recognized that existing neuropsychological measures of executive dysfunction lack adequate sensitivity and selectivity. While attempts have been made to develop improved measures, these have not yet been of great value to those who need to accurately identify executive deficits in a clinical setting. Several behavioral rating scales have been developed for this reason, including the 20-item Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX), which forms part of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) test battery. To investigate the ability of the DEX to identify executive dysfunction in an acute rehabilitation setting, the BADS was administered to 64 persons who had sustained traumatic brain injury. It was found to be almost as sensitive to executive dysfunction, as measured by the total score obtained on the BADS battery, as an extended 65-item version of the scale, when completed by either the occupational therapist or clinical neuropsychologist working with each patient. Family members and the patient themselves provided, as expected, less accurate information. Our results indicate that the DEX can be used with some confidence as a screening instrument to identify executive dysfunction in an acute rehabilitation setting, provided it is completed by professional personnel, trained to be sensitive to the cognitive and behavioral concomitants of this disorder. (JINS, 2005, 11, 376–385.)

Keywords

Dysexecutive questionnaire (DEX)Executive dysfunction (ED)Behavioral assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome (BADS)Clinical neuropsychology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , July 2005 , pp. 376 - 385
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alderman, N., Evans, J.J., Burgess, P., & Wilson, B.A. (1993). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 69–70.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.W., Damasio, H., Jones, R.D., & Tranel, D. (1991). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, B.N., Goldman, R.S., Heaton, R.K., Curtiss, G., Thompson, L.L., Chelune, G.J., & Kay, G.G. (1996). Discriminability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test using the standardization sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., Della Sala, S., Papagno, C., & Spinnler, H. (1997). Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology, 11, 187–194.Google Scholar
Banich, M.T. (1997). Neuropsychology: The neural basis of mental function. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.
Brooks, D.N., Aughton, M.E., Bond, M.R., Jones, P., & Rizvi, S. (1980). Cognitive sequelae in relationship to early indices of severity of brain damage after severe blunt head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 43, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, J. & Luszcz, M.A. (2000). Measurement of executive function: Considerations for detecting adult age differences. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, P.W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & Wilson, B.A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547–558.Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W., Veitch, E., de Lacy Costello, A., & Shallice, T. (2000). The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia, 38, 848–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, R.C.K. (2001). Dysexecutive symptoms among a non-clinical sample: A study with the use of the dysexecutive questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, S. & Crawford, S. (1999). Problem-solving in real-life-type situations: The effect of anterior and posterior lesions on performance. Neuropsychologia, 37, 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.R. (1998). Introduction to the assessment of attention and executive functioning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikmen, S.S., Machamer, J.E., Winn, H.R., & Temkin, N.R. (1995). Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury. Neuropsychology, 9, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslinger, P.J. & Damasio, A.R. (1985). Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology, 35, 1731–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.J., Chua, S.E., McKenna, P.J., & Wilson, B.A. (1997). Assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 27, 635–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, S.D., Johnson, S.C., Bigler, E.D., & Blatter, D.D. (1995). Nonspecific white matter degeneration following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L.H., Bernard, S., Fenwick, P.B., Burgess, P.W., & McNeil, J. (1993). Unilateral frontal lobectomy can produce strategy application disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 56, 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, K.W., Brooks, J., Crouch, J.A., Williams, M.C., & Rice, W.J. (1997). Factorial structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, E.T. & Bryer, J.B. (1986). Superior sorting and categorizing ability in a case of bilateral frontal atrophy: An exception to the rule. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton-Bayre, A.D., Geffen, G., & McFarland, K. (1997). Mild head injury and speed of information processing: A prospective study of professional rugby league players. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, C., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P.W. (2002). Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, H.S. & High, W.M. (1989). Contributions of neuroimaging to neuropsychological research on closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 3, 243–254.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, H.E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor, Berks (UK): NFER-Nelson.
Norris, G. & Tate, R.L. (2000). The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): Ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponsford, J.L. & Kinsella, G. (1992). Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 822–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponsford, J.L., Sloan, S., & Snow, P. (1995). Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Prigatano, G.P. (1996). TBI patients tend to underestimate: A replication and extension to patients with laterlized cerebral dysfunction. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccio, C.A., Hall, J., Morgan, A., & Hynd, G.W. (1994). Executive function and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Relationship with behavioural ratings and cognitive ability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, M. & Millis, S.R. (1992). Relating neuropsychological indicators to psychosocial outcome after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
Sbordone, R.J., Seyranian, G.D., & Ruff, R.M. (1998). Are the subjective complaints of traumatically brain injured patients reliable? Brain Injury, 12, 505–515.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. & Burgess, P.W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuss, D.T. & Alexander, M.P. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual review. Psychological Research, 63, 289–298.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T. & Benson, D.F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. California: Harper Collins.
Tranel, D., Anderson, S.W., & Benton, A.L. (1994). Development of the concept of ‘executive function’ and its relationship to the frontal lobes. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 125–148). Amsterdam: Elselvier.
van den Broek, M.D., Bradshaw, C.M., & Szabadi, E. (1993). Utility of the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in neuropsychological assessment. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B.A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P.W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J.J. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome: Test manual. England: Thames Valley Test Company.
Wilson, B.A., Evans, J.J., Emslie, H., Alderman, N., & Burgess, P. (1998). The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.T., Hadley, D.M., Wiedmann, K.D., & Teasdale, G.M. (1992). Intercorrelation of lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 6, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar