Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:55:53.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal study of confrontation naming in the “normal” elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2005

RONALD F. ZEC ,
STEPHEN J. MARKWELL ,
NICOLE R. BURKETT  and
DEB L. LARSEN
RONALD F. ZEC
Affiliation:
Center for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois Department of Neurology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois Department of Psychiatry, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
STEPHEN J. MARKWELL
Affiliation:
Statistics and Research Consulting, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
NICOLE R. BURKETT
Affiliation:
Center for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
DEB L. LARSEN
Affiliation:
Center for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The longitudinal effects of age on confrontation naming using the 60-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) were studied in 541 “normal” elderly (ages 50–99). For participants with at least 4 annual assessments (n = 238), 150 were followed for ≥6 years, 81 for ≥8 years, and 43 for ≥10 years. A small practice effect (0.21 words, p = 0.06) and moderately high test-retest reliability were found when comparing the first 2 assessments, which were 9–15 months apart (r = 0.76, n = 353). Reliable change index scores indicated that an annual decline of ≥4 points on the BNT is needed for a statistically reliable decline in an individual. A gradient in the mean annual rate of change on the BNT was found with improvement in the 50s age group, no change in the 60s age group, and decline in the 70s and 80s age groups. When projected over 10 years, the magnitudes of the mean changes were relatively small, that is, a 1-word improvement for participants in their 50s and a 1.3-word decline for participants in their 70s. These findings demonstrate that lexical retrieval as measured by a visual object confrontation naming task is generally well preserved in aging with only subtle decline in the 7th and 8th decades of age. (JINS, 2005, 11, 716–726.)

Keywords

Boston Naming TestAgingCognitionLanguageLexical retrievalNeuropsychology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , October 2005 , pp. 716 - 726
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M.S. (2002). Memory decline: The boundary between aging and age-related disease. Annals of Neurology, 51, 282–284.Google Scholar
Albert, M., Duffy, F.H., & Naeser, M. (1987). Nonlinear changes in cognition with age and their neuropsychologic correlates. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 141–157.Google Scholar
Albert, M.S., Heller, H.S., & Milberg, W. (1988). Changes in naming ability with age. Psychology of Aging, 3, 173–178.Google Scholar
Arvanitakis, Z., Wilson, R.S., Bienias, J.L., Evans, D.A., & Bennett, D.A. (2004). Diabetes mellitus and risk of Alzheimer disease and decline in cognitive function. Archives of Neurology, 61, 661–666.Google Scholar
Au, R., Joung, P., Nicholas, M., Obler, L.K., Kass, R., & Albert, M.L. (1995). Naming ability across the adult life span. Aging and Cognition, 2, 300–311.Google Scholar
Bayles, K.A., Tomoeda, C.K., & Trosset, M.W. (1992). Relation of linguistic communication abilities of Alzheimer's patients to stage of disease. Brain and Language, 42, 454–472.Google Scholar
Becker, R. & Markwell, S. (2000). Problems arising from the generalising of treatment efficacy from clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Mistaking statistical significance as clinical significance. Clinical Drug Investigations, 19, 33–41.Google Scholar
Bowles, N.L., Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (1987). Naming errors in healthy aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Cortex, 23, 519–524.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. & Faulkner, D. (1986). Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 187–197.Google Scholar
Connor, L.T., Spiro, A., Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (2004). Change in object naming ability during adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59, 203–209.Google Scholar
Cruice, M.N., Worrall, L.E., & Hickson, L.M. (2000). Boston Naming Test results for healthy older Australians: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Aphasiology, 14, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N.J., Rourke, B.P., & Bieliauskas, L.A. (1999). Neuropsychological subgroups of patients with Alzheimer's disease: An examination of the first 10 years of CERAD data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 488–518.Google Scholar
Glynn, R.J., Beckett, L.A., Hebert, L.E., Morris, M.C., Scherr, P.A., & Evans, D.A. (1999). Current and remote blood pressure and cognitive decline. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 438–445.Google Scholar
Horn, J.L. (1982a). The aging of human abilities. In B.B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology, pp. 847–870. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: cPrentice-Hall.
Horn, J.L. (1982b). The theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence in relation to concepts of cognitive psychology and aging in adulthood. In F.I.M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes, Vol. 8, pp. 237–278. New York: Plenum Press.
Horn, J.L. & Donaldson, G. (1980). Cognitive development: 2. Adulthood development of human abilities. In O.G. Brim & I. Kagan (Eds.), Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jorm, A.F., Korten, A.E., & Henderson, A.S. (1987). The prevalence of dementia: A quantitative integration of the literature. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 76, 465–479.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub. S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Kemper, T.L. (1993). The relationship of cerebral cortical changes to nuclei in the brainstem. Neurobiology of Aging, 14, 659–660.Google Scholar
Kent, P.S. & Luszcz, M.A. (2002). A review of the Boston Naming Test and multiple-occasion normative data for older adults on 15-item versions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, J.J., Jacobs, D.M., Sano, M., Bell, K., Merchant, C.A., Small, S.A., & Stern, Y. (1998). Cognitive test performance among nondemented elderly African Americans and Whites. Neurology, 50, 1238–1245.Google Scholar
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlin, E.M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Heath and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.Google Scholar
Mitrushina, M. & Satz, P. (1995). Repeated testing of normal elderly with the Boston Naming Test. Aging, 7, 123–127.Google Scholar
Morrison, J.H. & Hof, P.R. (1997). Life and death of neurons in the aging brain. Science, 278, 412–419.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. & Peters, A. (2000). The effects of aging on the frequency of nerve fibers in rhesus monkey striate cortex. Neurobiology of Aging, 21, 621–628.Google Scholar
Schaie, K.W. (1980). Intellectual change in adulthood (trans., Zeit). Gerontology, 15, 373–384.Google Scholar
Schaie, K.W. (2002). The impact of longitudinal studies on understanding development from young adulthood to old age. In W. Hartup & R.K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Growing points in developmental science: An introduction (pp. 307–328). Cambridge, UK: Psychology Press.
Schaie, K.W. & Hofer, S.M. (2001). Longitudinal studies in research on aging. In J.E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed.), pp. 53–77. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schooler, C. (1990). Psychosocial factors and effective cognitive functioning in adulthood. In J.E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed.), pp. 347–358. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Testa, J.A., Ivnik, R.J., Boeve, B., Petersen, R.C., Pankratz, V.S., Knopman, D., Tangalos, E., & Smith, G.E. (2004). Confrontation naming does not add incremental diagnostic utility in MCI and Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 504–512.Google Scholar
Zec, R.F. (1995). Neuropsychology of aging. Experimental Gerontology, 30, 431–442.Google Scholar
Zec, R.F., Vicari, S., Andrise, A., Belman, J., & Landreth, E. (1992). A comparison of confrontational and generative naming in Alzheimer patients and elderly controls. New York Neuropsychology Group Meeting, New York. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 63, 245.Google Scholar