Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:21:11.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interrater reliability of neuropsychological diagnoses: A Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2002

ROBERTA F. WHITE
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center and Boston University, Boston
KENNETH E. JAMES
Affiliation:
DVA Cooperative Studies Program and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
JENNIFER J. VASTERLING
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center and Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
KAREN MARANS
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center and Boston University, Boston
RICHARD DELANEY
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center, West Haven, Connecticut
MAXINE KRENGEL
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center and Boston University, Boston
FREDRIC ROSE
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

This study examined the interrater reliability of neuropsychological diagnoses produced by clinical neuropsychologists across 4 medical centers. These diagnoses were based on evaluations using a comprehensive battery of commonly used neuropsychological test instruments, interview, history and medical chart review. The diagnoses of individual neuropsychologists were compared to those made by members of an external review panel for each patient evaluated. Patients were first diagnosed as showing cognitive impairment versus no cognitive impairment. If a patient was diagnosed as impaired, a specific neuropsychological diagnosis was assigned. The diagnostic classification for cognitive impairment was moderately reliable [κ = .48 ± s.e.(κ) = .062]. The interrater reliability for specific diagnoses was in the fair to good range [κ = .44 ± s.e.(κ) = .029]. These levels of reliability are comparable to those found for other psychiatric and neurologic specialties and for medical diagnoses made by other health care disciplines. (JINS, 2002, 8, 555–565.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)