Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:38:09.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Speech-language Therapy on Spontaneous Speech in Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2020

Elodie Guillouët ,
Mélanie Cogné ,
Elisabeth Saverot ,
Nicolas Roche ,
Pascale Pradat-Diehl ,
Agnès Weill-Chounlamountry ,
Vanessa Ramel ,
Catherine Taratte ,
Anne-Gaëlle Lachasse  and
Jean-Arthur Haulot
...Show all authors
Elodie Guillouët
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches 92380, France EA4047, HANDIReSP, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Versailles 78180, France
Mélanie Cogné
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital, Rennes 35000, France
Elisabeth Saverot
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, MGEN, Maisons-Laffitte 78600, France
Nicolas Roche
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches 92380, France INSERM Unit 1179, Team 3, Technologies and Innovative Therapies Applied to Neuromuscular Diseases, UVSQ, CIC 429, Physiology-Functional Testing Ward, AP-HP, Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Garches 92380, France
Pascale Pradat-Diehl
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, Paris 75013, France
Agnès Weill-Chounlamountry
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, Paris 75013, France
Vanessa Ramel
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, Paris 75013, France
Catherine Taratte
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, MGEN, Maisons-Laffitte 78600, France
Anne-Gaëlle Lachasse
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, MGEN, Maisons-Laffitte 78600, France
Jean-Arthur Haulot
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, MGEN, Maisons-Laffitte 78600, France
Isabelle Vaugier
Affiliation:
Inserm, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1429, AP-HP, Raymond Poincaré hospital, Garches 92380, France
Frédéric Barbot
Affiliation:
Inserm, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1429, AP-HP, Raymond Poincaré hospital, Garches 92380, France
Philippe Azouvi*
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches 92380, France EA4047, HANDIReSP, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Versailles 78180, France
Sophie Charveriat
Affiliation:
Rehabilitation Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches 92380, France EA4047, HANDIReSP, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Versailles 78180, France
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Philippe Azouvi, Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Aphasia recovery depends on neural reorganization, which can be enhanced by speech-language therapy and noninvasive brain stimulation. Several studies suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) associated with speech-language therapy may improve verbal performance evaluated by analytic tests, but none focused on spontaneous speech. We explored the effect of bihemispheric tDCS on spontaneous speech in patients with poststroke aphasia.

Methods:

In this multicentric controlled randomized cross-over double-blind study, we included 10 patients with poststroke aphasia (4 had aphasia >6 months and 6 with aphasia <6 months). We combined the sessions of speech-language therapy and bihemispheric tDCS (2 mA, 20 min). After three baseline speech evaluations (1/week), two different conditions were randomly consecutively proposed: active and sham tDCS over 3 weeks with 1 week of washout in between. The main outcome measure was the number of different nouns used in 2 min to answer the question “what is your job.”

Results:

There was no significant difference between conditions concerning the main outcome measure (p = .47) nor in the number of verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, repetitions, blank ideas, ideas, utterances with grammatical errors or paraphasias used. Other cognitive functions (verbal working memory, neglect, or verbal fluency) were not significantly improved in the tDCS group. No adverse events occurred.

Conclusion:

Our results differed from previous studies using tDCS to improve naming in patients with poststroke aphasia possibly due to bihemispheric stimulation, rarely used previously. The duration of the rehabilitation period was short given the linguistic complexity of the measure. This negative result should be confirmed by larger studies with ecological measures.

Keywords

StrokeLanguagetDCSRehabilitationSpontaneous discourseEcological assessment
Type
Regular Research
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 26 , Special Issue 1: Rehabilitation , January 2020 , pp. 7 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2020. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aïach, P. & Baumann, Mi. (2007). L’aphasie, principal facteur aggravant du vécu d’un AVC par les proches. Médecine, 3(3), 130–135. doi: 10.1684/med.2007.0093 Google Scholar
ALHarbi, M.F., Armijo-Olivo, S., & Kim, E.S. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve naming ability in post-stroke aphasia: A critical review. Behavioural Brain Research, 332, 7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J.M., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2010). Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke, 41(6), 1229–1236. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, R. & Jonkers, R. (1998). Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(11), 951–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biga, J. (2017). Haute Autorité de Santé – Rééducation de la voix, du langage et de la parole. Retrieved September 23, 2018, from https://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/r_1498794/fr/reeducation-de-la-voix-du-langage-et-de-la-parole.Google Scholar
Biou, E., Cassoudesalle, H., Cogne, M., Sibon, I., Gabory, I.D., Dehail, P., Aupy, J., & Glize, B. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: A systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 62(2), 104–121. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, M.C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6), CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4 Google Scholar
Branscheidt, M., Hoppe, J., Zwitserlood, P., & Liuzzi, G. (2018). tDCS over the motor cortex improves lexical retrieval of action words in poststroke aphasia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 119(2), 621–630. doi: 10.1152/jn.00285.2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, F. (2014). Dictionnaire d’orthophonie. Isbergues: Ortho éd.Google Scholar
Brookshire, R.H. & Nicholas, L.E. (1994). Speech sample size and test-retest stability of connected speech measures for adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(2), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, S., Caltagirone, C., & Marangolo, P. (2015). Combining voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) with A-tDCS language treatment: Predicting outcome of recovery in nonfluent chronic aphasia. Brain Stimulation, 8(4), 769–776. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S.B. & Ulatowska, H.K. (1989). Discourse in aphasia: Integration deficits in processing reference. Brain and Language, 36(4), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherney, L.R., Babbitt, E.M., Hurwitz, R., Rogers, L.M., Stinear, J., Wang, X., Harvey, R.L., & Parrish, T. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation and aphasia: The case of mr. C. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1310/tsr2001-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipollari, S., Veniero, D., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., Koch, G., & Marangolo, P. (2015). Combining TMS-EEG with transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment in aphasia. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 15(7), 833–845. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1049998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G., O’Neil-Pirozzi, T.M., & Coon, M. (1997). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke. Brain and Language, 56(2), 183–210. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Aguiar, V., Bastiaanse, R., Capasso, R., Gandolfi, M., Smania, N., Rossi, G., & Miceli, G. (2015). Can tDCS enhance item-specific effects and generalization after linguistically motivated aphasia therapy for verbs? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 190. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boissezon, X., Raboyeau, G., Simonetta-Moreau, M., Puel, M., Démonet, J.F., & Cardebat, D. (2008). Imagerie fonctionnelle cérébrale et prise en charge thérapeutique de l’aphasie : Orthophonie et stimulation magnétique transcrânienne repetitive [Functional neuroimaging and the treatment of aphasia: Speech therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation]. Revue Neurologique, 164 Suppl 3, S45–S48. doi: 10.1016/S0035-3787(08)73290-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, E.S., Schmah, T., & Small, S.L. (2016). Performance variability as a predictor of response to aphasia treatment. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30(9), 876–882. doi: 10.1177/1545968316642522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, B., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., & Mehrholz, J. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6), CD009760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub2 Google Scholar
Elsner, B., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., & Mehrholz, J. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5), CD009760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub3 Google Scholar
Ewa, P.K., Maciej, L.M., Barbara, S.J., Wojciech, C., & Anna, C. (2013). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in early rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 31(6), 761–771. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130333 Google Scholar
Falconer, C. & Antonucci, S.M. (2012). Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion. Aphasiology, 26(1), 64–82. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.602390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiori, V., Coccia, M., Marinelli, C.V., Vecchi, V., Bonifazi, S., Ceravolo, M.G., Provinciali, L., Tomaiuolo, F., & Marangolo, P. (2011). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2309–2323. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiori, V., Nitsche, M., Iasevoli, L., Cucuzza, G., Caltagirone, C., & Marangolo, P. (2017). Differential effects of bihemispheric and unihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation in young and elderly adults in verbal learning. Behavioural Brain Research, 321, 170–175. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flöel, A., Meinzer, M., Kirstein, R., Nijhof, S., Deppe, M., Knecht, S., & Breitenstein, C. (2011). Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation. Stroke, 42(7), 2065–2067. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridriksson, J., Rorden, C., Elm, J., Sen, S., George, M.S., & Bonilha, L. (2018). Transcranial direct current stimulation vs sham stimulation to treat aphasia after stroke: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology, 75(12), 1470–1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galletta, E.E. & Vogel-Eyny, A. (2015). Translational treatment of aphasia combining neuromodulation and behavioral intervention for lexical retrieval: Implications from a single case study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 447. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandiga, P.C., Hummel, F.C., & Cohen, L.G. (2006). Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(4), 845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., & Joanette, Y. (1989). The bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(2), 49–54.Google Scholar
Godefroy, O. & Groupe de réflexion sur l’évaluation des fonctions exécutives. (2008). Fonctions exécutives et pathologies neurologiques et psychiatriques: Évaluation en pratique clinique. Marseille: Solal.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. (2007). HDAE, échelle d’évaluation de l’aphasie: Adaptation française du Boston diagnostic aphasia examination de (Vols 1–1). Paris: ECPA, les Éd. du Centre de psychologie appliquée.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (2009). Cohesion in English (Nachdr.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hartwigsen, G. & Saur, D. (2017). Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia – Insights into plasticity of the human language network. NeuroImage, 190, 14–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, I.-Y., Lim, J.Y., Kang, E.K., Sohn, H.M., & Paik, N.-J. (2011). The factors associated with good responses to speech therapy combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasic patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(4), 460. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, E.K., Kim, Y.K., Sohn, H.M., Cohen, L.G., & Paik, N.-J. (2011). Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29(3), 141–152. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. The American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klippi, A., Sellman, J., Heikkinen, P., & Laine, M. (2012). Current clinical practices in aphasia therapy in Finland: Challenges in moving towards National Best Practice. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64(4), 169–178. doi: 10.1159/000341106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. & Thompson, C.K. (2011). Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 813–825. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.542563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Y., Cheon, H.-J., Yoon, K.J., Chang, W.H., & Kim, Y.-H. (2013). Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation for Aphasia in Chronic stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(5), 603–610. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, R., Renga, V., Zhu, L.L., Nair, D., & Schlaug, G. (2010). Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 75(24), 2176–2184. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loban, W. (1963). The language of elementary school children. Ed. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Manenti, R., Petesi, M., Brambilla, M., Rosini, S., Miozzo, A., Padovani, A., Miniussi, C., & Cotelli, M. (2015). Efficacy of semantic-phonological treatment combined with tDCS for verb retrieval in a patient with aphasia. Neurocase, 21(1), 109–119. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2013.873062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Calpagnano, M.A., Campana, S., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., & Marini, A. (2013a). tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 539. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Caltagirone, C., Pisano, F., & Priori, A. (2018). Transcranial cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances verb generation but not verb naming in poststroke aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(2), 188–199. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Campana, S., Calpagnano, M.A., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., & Marini, A. (2014). Something to talk about: Enhancement of linguistic cohesion through tdCS in chronic non fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 53, 246–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Cipollari, S., Campana, S., Razzano, C., Di Paola, M., … Caltagirone, C. (2013b). Bihemispheric stimulation over left and right inferior frontal region enhances recovery from apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 38(9), 3370–3377. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Sabatini, U., De Pasquale, G., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C., & Gili, T. (2016). Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment enhances functional connectivity in the left hemisphere: Preliminary data from aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(5), 724–738. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Shofany, J., Gili, T., Caltagirone, C., Cucuzza, G., & Priori, A. (2017). Moving beyond the brain: Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia. Frontiers in Neurology, 8, 400. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marangolo, P., Marinelli, C.V., Bonifazi, S., Fiori, V., Ceravolo, M.G., Provinciali, L., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2011). Electrical stimulation over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) determines long-term effects in the recovery of speech apraxia in three chronic aphasics. Behavioural Brain Research, 225(2), 498–504. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1372–1392. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.584690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazaux, J.M. & Orgogozo, J.M. (1982). Etude analytique et quantitative des troubles du langage par lesion du thalamus gauche: L’aphasie thalamique. Cortex, 18(3), 403–416. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(82)80039-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinzer, M., Darkow, R., Lindenberg, R., & Flöel, A. (2016). Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Brain, 139(4), 1152–1163. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, A., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Vergari, M., Zago, S., & Priori, A. (2008). Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 79(4), 451–453. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeser, M.A., Martin, P.I., Theoret, H., Kobayashi, M., Fregni, F., Nicholas, M., Tormos, J.M., Steven, M.S., Baker, E.H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2011). TMS suppression of right pars triangularis, but not pars opercularis, improves naming in aphasia. Brain and Language, 119(3), 206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norise, C., Sacchetti, D., & Hamilton, R. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke chronic aphasia: The impact of baseline severity and task specificity in a pilot sample. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 260. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otal, B., Olma, M.C., Flöel, A., & Wellwood, I. (2015). Inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation to homologous language regions as an adjunct to speech and language therapy in post-stroke aphasia: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 236. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pestalozzi, M.I., Di Pietro, M., Martins Gaytanidis, C., Spierer, L., Schnider, A., Chouiter, L., Colombo, F., Annoni, J.M., & Jost, L.B. (2018). Effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on lexical access in chronic poststroke aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 32(10), 913–923. doi: 10.1177/1545968318801551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanowska, K.E., Leśniak, M., Seniów, J.B., & Członkowska, A. (2013). No effects of anodal transcranial direct stimulation on language abilities in early rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasic patients. Neurologia I Neurochirurgia Polska, 47(5), 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2017). Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(6), 689–732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2018). Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: Acceptability, reliability, and validity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(6), 1078–1093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandars, M., Cloutman, L., & Woollams, A. (2017). Manipulating laterality and polarity of transcranial direct current stimulation to optimise outcomes for anomia therapy in an individual with chronic Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 32(7), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1350631 Google Scholar
Santos, M.D., Gagliardi, R.J., Mac-Kay, A.P.M.G., Boggio, P.S., Lianza, R., & Fregni, F. (2013). Transcranial direct-current stimulation induced in stroke patients with aphasia: A prospective experimental cohort study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 131(6), 422–426. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1316595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, M.D.D., Cavenaghi, V.B., Mac-Kay, A.P.M.G., Serafim, V., Venturi, A., Truong, D.Q., Huang, Y., Boggio, P.S., Fregni, F., Bikson, M., & Gagliardi, R.J. (2017). Non-invasive brain stimulation and computational models in post-stroke aphasic patients: Single session of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation. A randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista Paulista De Medicina, 135(5), 475–480. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0194060617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saur, D. & Hartwigsen, G. (2012). Neurobiology of language recovery after stroke: Lessons from neuroimaging studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(1 Suppl), S15–S25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, R., Saxena, S., Tsapkini, K., Faria, A.V., Long, C., Wright, A., Davis, C., Tippett, D.C., Mourdoukoutas, A.P., Bikson, M., Celnik, P., & Hillis, A.E. (2016). Cerebellar tDCS: A novel approach to augment language treatment post-stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 695. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00695 Google Scholar
Shah-Basak, P.P., Norise, C., Garcia, G., Torres, J., Faseyitan, O., & Hamilton, R.H. (2015). Individualized treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia due to stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 201. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah-Basak, P.P., Wurzman, R., Purcell, J.B., Gervits, F., & Hamilton, R. (2016). Fields or flows? A comparative metaanalysis of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation to treat post-stroke aphasia. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34(4), 537–558. doi: 10.3233/RNN-150616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherratt, S. (2007). Multi-level discourse analysis: A feasible approach. Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 375–393. doi: 10.1080/02687030600911435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielmann, K., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W.M., Heijenbrok-Kal, M.H., & Ribbers, G.M. (2018). Comparison of two configurations of transcranial direct current stimulation for aphasia treatment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(6), 527–533. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomczak, M. & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19–25.Google Scholar
Torres, J., Drebing, D., & Hamilton, R. (2013). TMS and tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: Integrating novel treatment approaches with mechanisms of plasticity. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 31(4), 501–515. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestito, L., Rosellini, S., Mantero, M., & Bandini, F. (2014). Long-term effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in chronic post-stroke aphasia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 785. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00785 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villard, S. & Kiran, S. (2018). Between-session and within-session intra-individual variability in attention in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 109, 95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vines, B.W., Norton, A.C., & Schlaug, G. (2011). Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpato, C., Cavinato, M., Piccione, F., Garzon, M., Meneghello, F., & Birbaumer, N. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Broca’s area in chronic aphasia: A controlled outcome study. Behavioural Brain Research, 247, 211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.03.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhead, Z.V.J., Kerry, S.J., Aguilar, O.M., Ong, Y.-H., Hogan, J.S., Pappa, K., Leff, A.P., & Crinion, J.T. (2018). Randomized trial of iReadMore word reading training and brain stimulation in central alexia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 141(7), 2127–2141. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, D., Wang, J., & Yuan, Y. (2015). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on naming and cortical excitability in stroke patients with aphasia. Neuroscience Letters, 589, 115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.01.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, D.S., Kim, D.-Y., Chun, M.H., Jung, S.E., & Park, S.J. (2011). Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients. Brain and Language, 119(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Z.-Z., Jiang, S.-J., Jia, Z.-S., Xiao, H.-Y., & Zhou, M.-Q. (2017). Study on language rehabilitation for aphasia. Chinese Medical Journal, 130(12), 1491–1497. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.207465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Guillouët et al. supplementary material

Guillouët et al. supplementary material 1

Download Guillouët et al. supplementary material(File)
File 96.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Guillouët et al. supplementary material

Guillouët et al. supplementary material 2

Download Guillouët et al. supplementary material(File)
File 121.7 KB