Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:10:36.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does literacy have an effect on stick construction tasks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2000

ESMERALDA MATUTE
Affiliation:
Departamento de Estudios en Educación, CUCSH, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico Instituto de Neurociencias, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
FERNANDO LEAL
Affiliation:
Departamento de Estudios en Lenguas Indígenas, CUCSH, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
DANIEL ZARABOZO
Affiliation:
Instituto de Neurociencias, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, Mexico
ANTONIA ROBLES
Affiliation:
Instituto de Neurociencias, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
CONCEPCIÓN CEDILLO
Affiliation:
Instituto de Neurociencias, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico

Abstract

Since constructional apraxia is often concomitant with brain lesions, the study of constructional tasks in the non-brain-damaged population might be useful in helping to disentangle other causal factors. This paper explores the performance of illiterate individuals (N = 29) as compared to that of semiliterates (N = 21) and literates (N = 23) in order to see the effect of reading and writing abilities on constructional tasks. Each participant was asked to construct 4 figures based upon models having varying degrees of complexity. A global criterion of lack of fidelity and several analytic criteria (related to distortion, rotation, and disarticulation errors) were used to evaluate performance. Although illiterates generally made more errors than semiliterates and semiliterates more than literates, only some of these differences were statistically significant. Significant differences were found for lack of global fidelity and disarticulation errors when all 4 figures were considered together. Subtler data emerged with respect to single figures. (JINS, 2000, 6, 668–672.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)