Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:24:26.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilingual effects of unilingual neuropsychological treatment of dyslexic adolescents: A pilot study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

E. Jan Kappers  and
Marjolein Dekker
E. Jan Kappers
Affiliation:
Paedologisch Instituut, P.O. Box 303, 1115 ZG Duivendrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marjolein Dekker
Affiliation:
Paedologisch Instituut, P.O. Box 303, 1115 ZG Duivendrecht, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fourteen young adolescents with specific reading disabilities received short term neuropsychological treatment–specifically left hemisphere (LH) or right hemisphere (RH) stimulation–in a clinical pilot project. The effects on single-word and passage reading were evaluated when the language of treatment was either Dutch (mother tongue) or English (foreign language). Transfer effects across the two languages were also studied. In general, the results indicate that these short term interventions may prove successful for the treated language and with the additional transfer to a second (not treated) language. (JINS, 1995, I, 494–500.)

Keywords

DyslexiaTreatmentForeign language
Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 1 , Issue 5 , September 1995 , pp. 494 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M.L. & Obler, L.K. (1978). The bilingual brain. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, D.J. (1979). Hemispheric differences and reading strategies: Two dyslexias? Bulletin of the Orton Society, 29, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, D.J. (1990). Neuropsychological treatment of dyslexia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentin, S. (1981). On the representation of a second language in the cerebral hemispheres of right-handed people. Neuropsychologia, 19, 599–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouma, A. (1988). Perceptual asymmetries and hemispheric specialization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J.L. & Gates, E.A. (1978). Visual field differences in verbal tasks: Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject. Brain and Language, 5, 166–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryden, M.P. & Allard, F. (1976). Visual hemifield differences depend on type-face. Brain and Language, 3, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmon, A., Nachshon, I., & Starinsky, R. (1976). Developmental aspects of visual hemifield differences in perception of verbal material. Brain and Language, 3, 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, M., Shimizu, A., & Nakamura, I. (1981). Laterality differences in recognition of Japanese and Hangul words by monolinguals and bilinguals. Cortex, 17, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galloway, L.M. (1982). Bilingualism: Neuropsychological considerations. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15, 12–28.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. & Costa, L.D. (1981). Hemispheric differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14, 144–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellige, J.B. (1976). Changes in same-different laterality patterns as a function of practice and stimulus quality. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellige, J.B. & Webster, R. (1979). Right hemisphere superiority for initial stages of letter processing. Neuropsychologia, 17, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kappers, E.J. (1986). Structureringstendentie, hemisfeerspecialisatie en leren lezen. (Cognitive restructuring, hemispheric specialization and learning to read, with an extended summary in English). Doctoral dissertation, State University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Kappers, E.J. (1994). Neuropsychological treatment of dyslexia in clinical practice. In Bos, K.P. van de, Siegel, L.S., Bakker, D.J., & Share, D.L. (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Licht, R. (1988). Event-related potential asymmetries and word reading in children: A developmental study. Academisch proefschrift. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Moerland, M.C. & Bakker, D.J. (1993). Hemstim i.o: A computerized treatment program for children suffering from P-type or L-type dyslexia. In Maarse, F.J., Akkerman, A.E., Brand, A.N., Mulder, L.J.M., & Stelt, J.J. van der (Eds.), Computers in psychology: Tools for experimental and applied psychology (pp. 151–158). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Oud, J.H.L., Reelick, F., & Raaymakers, M. (1989). Time Data Analysis Program (TIDA). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Catholic University.Google Scholar
Silverberg, R., Bentin, S., Gaziel, T., Obler, L.K., & Albert, M.L. (1979). Shift of visual field preference for English words in native Hebrew speakers. Brain and Language, 8, 184–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverberg, R., Gordon, H.W., Pollack, S., & Bentin, S. (1980). Shift of visual field preference for Hebrew words in native speakers learning to read. Brain and Language, 11, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaid, J. (1983). Bilingualism and brain lateralization. In Segalowitz, S.J. (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R.M. & Te Lintelo, H.G. (1977). Individualisering van het leesonderwijs. Den Bosch: Katholiek Pedagogisch Centrum.Google Scholar
Zwarts, M.R. (1990). Balans van het taalonderwijs aan het einde van de basisschool. Uitkomsten van de eerste taalpeiling einde basisonderwijs, PPON-reeks nr 2, Arnhem: CITO.Google Scholar