Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:26:17.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

66 Tolerability of HD-tDCS at Total Amplitudes of 2mA to 10mA in Older Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Ashley Harrie*
Affiliation:
Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carine El Jamal
Affiliation:
Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael Padgett
Affiliation:
Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Annalise Rahman-Filipiak
Affiliation:
Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Benjamin M Hampstead
Affiliation:
Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
Correspondence: Ashley Harrie, Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation Based Interventions, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Arbor Lakes Building 1 Suite 2400, 4251 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation used to modulate neuronal activity in a brain region of interest. Growing research has shown that HD-tDCS is a promising treatment for cognitive decline in neurodegenerative disease. Most HD-tDCS studies have used amplitudes of 2mA or less, with little investigation into tolerability at greater intensities since anecdotal lore generally suggests them to be poorly tolerated. Therefore, we examined the tolerability of HD-tDCS and common side effect profile in older adults who received total amplitudes of 3mA to 10mA (delivered using multiple electrodes delivering 2-4mA). We developed a series of methods (e.g., participant instructions, task engagement, techniques to lower impedance) and hypothesized they would equate the experience between active and sham HD-tDCS. We also compared symptom endorsement between those receiving active stimulation at 3mA+ total versus those receiving 2mA or lower; again, hypothesizing no difference in reported symptoms.

Participants and Methods:

295 older adults (Mage = 71.12±9.42) (Normal Cognition = 75, Amnestic MCI [aMCI] = 172, Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type [DAT] = 27, Other = 21) were enrolled across six HD-tDCS studies. All participants received one to thirty 20- to 30-minute sessions of active or sham stimulation at total amplitudes between 2mA and 10mA. All participants completed a standardized side effect questionnaire after each session asking whether they experienced burning, tingling, itching, scalp pain, trouble concentrating, sleepiness, headache, mood changes, neck pain, skin redness, or any other symptoms. When symptoms were endorsed, participants rated the severity of the symptom (mild, moderate, severe).

Results:

We used Fisher's Exact tests to compare the frequency and severity of side effects in active (3mA or higher) vs. sham stimulation. Those receiving sham were significantly more likely to report tingling than those receiving active HD-tDCS. Conversely, those receiving active stimulation more frequently endorsed mood changes and skin redness relative to the sham group, though moderate-severe ratings were endorsed in only 2.9% and 0.4% of the sessions, respectively. Relative to those receiving 2mA, participants receiving higher intensities of active stimulation experienced skin redness more frequently, whereas the 2mA reported higher frequencies of itching and scalp pain. A burning sensation was endorsed at equal rates between these groups; however, the higher intensity active group reported it as moderate or severe more frequently than the 2mA active group. Despite these minor differences, most side effects following 3mA+ were reported at low frequencies and were typically mild when endorsed.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrate that HD-tDCS is well-tolerated for total amplitudes up to 10mA in older adults with little tangible difference in the reported experience relative to sham. Findings support the use of higher HD-tDCS amplitudes, at least when key methodological procedures are followed.

Type
Poster Session 05: Neuroimaging | Neurophysiology | Neurostimulation | Technology | Cross Cultural | Multiculturalism | Career Development
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023