Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:17:13.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

61 Network Segregation Predicts Processing Speed in the Cognitively Healthy Oldest-old

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Sara A Nolin*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Mary E Faulkner
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Paul Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Leland Fleming
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Stacy Merritt
Affiliation:
Univeristy of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Roxanne F Rezaei
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Pradyumna K Bharadwaj
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Mary Kathryn Franchetti
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Daniel A Raichlen
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Courtney J Jessup
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Lloyd Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
G Alex Hishaw
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Emily J Van Etten
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Theodore P Trouard
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
David S Geldmacher
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Virginia G Wadley
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Noam Alperin
Affiliation:
Univeristy of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Eric C Porges
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Adam J Woods
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ronald A Cohen
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Bonnie E Levin
Affiliation:
Univeristy of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Tatjana Rundek
Affiliation:
Univeristy of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Gene E Alexander
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA.
Kristina M Visscher
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
*
Correspondence: Sara A Nolin, University of Alabama at Birmingham, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Understanding the factors contributing to optimal cognitive function throughout the aging process is essential to better understand successful cognitive aging. Processing speed is an age sensitive cognitive domain that usually declines early in the aging process; however, this cognitive skill is essential for other cognitive tasks and everyday functioning. Evaluating brain network interactions in cognitively healthy older adults can help us understand how brain characteristics variations affect cognitive functioning. Functional connections among groups of brain areas give insight into the brain’s organization, and the cognitive effects of aging may relate to this large-scale organization. To follow-up on our prior work, we sought to replicate our findings regarding network segregation’s relationship with processing speed. In order to address possible influences of node location or network membership we replicated the analysis across 4 different node sets.

Participants and Methods:

Data were acquired as part of a multi-center study of 85+ cognitively normal individuals, the McKnight Brain Aging Registry (MBAR). For this analysis, we included 146 community-dwelling, cognitively unimpaired older adults, ages 85-99, who had undergone structural and BOLD resting state MRI scans and a battery of neuropsychological tests. Exploratory factor analysis identified the processing speed factor of interest. We preprocessed BOLD scans using fmriprep, Ciftify, and XCPEngine algorithms. We used 4 different sets of connectivity-based parcellation: 1)MBAR data used to define nodes and Power (2011) atlas used to determine node network membership, 2) Younger adults data used to define nodes (Chan 2014) and Power (2011) atlas used to determine node network membership, 3) Older adults data from a different study (Han 2018) used to define nodes and Power (2011) atlas used to determine node network membership, and 4) MBAR data used to define nodes and MBAR data based community detection used to determine node network membership.

Segregation (balance of within-network and between-network connections) was measured within the association system and three wellcharacterized networks: Default Mode Network (DMN), Cingulo-Opercular Network (CON), and Fronto-Parietal Network (FPN). Correlation between processing speed and association system and networks was performed for all 4 node sets.

Results:

We replicated prior work and found the segregation of both the cortical association system, the segregation of FPN and DMN had a consistent relationship with processing speed across all node sets (association system range of correlations: r=.294 to .342, FPN: r=.254 to .272, DMN: r=.263 to .273). Additionally, compared to parcellations created with older adults, the parcellation created based on younger individuals showed attenuated and less robust findings as those with older adults (association system r=.263, FPN r=.255, DMN r=.263).

Conclusions:

This study shows that network segregation of the oldest-old brain is closely linked with processing speed and this relationship is replicable across different node sets created with varied datasets. This work adds to the growing body of knowledge about age-related dedifferentiation by demonstrating replicability and consistency of the finding that as essential cognitive skill, processing speed, is associated with differentiated functional networks even in very old individuals experiencing successful cognitive aging.

Type
Poster Session 04: Aging | MCI
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023