Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:31:21.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

54 The Differential Impact of Genetic Moderators on the Relationship Between Depression and Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Mia L. Delgadillo*
Affiliation:
Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Eliza Morgan
Affiliation:
Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nesha Harper
Affiliation:
Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Aidan Boese
Affiliation:
Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jennifer K Fairchild
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
*
Correspondence: Mia L. Delgadillo, Palo Alto University, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Depression has a well-established negative effect on cognitive functioning. Variations in the apolipoprotein e (APOE) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genes likely contribute to this relationship. APOE4 and the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism are independently associated with late-life depression and cognitive dysfunction. The current study investigated the moderating effects of APOE4 and BDNFMet (i.e., the presence of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism) on the relationship between depression and cognitive functioning in older adults.

Participants and Methods:

The sample included 103 older adults drawn from two clinical trials who were recruited from the VA Palo Alto Health Care System (VAPAHCS) and the Stanford/VA Alzheimer’s Disease Center. Depression was diagnosed using the Mini Neuropsychiatric Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV). The presence of an APOE4 and BDNFMet allele were dichotomized (i.e., yes/no) and determined using venipuncture. A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was used to assess attention (RAVLT Trial 1, WAIS-IV DSF), processing speed (TMTA, SDMT, Stroop Word, Stroop Color), working memory (WAIS-IV DSB, DSS), visuospatial functioning (JLO), language (VNT), memory (RAVLT Delayed Recall, WMS-IV Logical Memory II), and executive function (TMTB, Stroop Color-Word). Separate moderation analyses were conducted with depression as the predictor and APOE4 or BDNFMet status as the moderator using the SPSS PROCESS macro v4.0. Age was a covariate for models with processing speed, memory, language, and executive function as outcome variables.

Results:

Participants were largely male (93%) and White (75%). Ten percent met criteria for depression, 26% were APOE4 carriers, and 32% were BDNFMet carriers. The overall model examining depression, APOE4, and memory was significant (p < .01, R2 = .14). Depression was associated with lower memory performance (p < .05), however, APOE4 was not a significant moderator (p > .05). Similarly, the overall model examining depression, APOE4, and language was also significant (p < .05, R2 = .10). While the direct effects of depression and APOE4 on language were nonsignificant (p > .05), there was a significant two-way interaction between APOE4 and depression (p = .03). The overall model with depression, BDNFMet, and memory was significant (p < .001, R2 = .18). While neither depression nor BDNFMet had significant direct effects on memory (p > .05), a two-way interaction emerged between depression and BDNFMet (p = .05). Simple slopes analyses were used to further investigate significant interactions. Depression, APOE4, and BDNFMet did not significantly impact attention, processing speed, working memory, visuospatial functioning, or executive function, and no significant interactions were noted among variables. BDNFMet had no direct impact on language.

Conclusions:

APOE4 and BDNFMet were found to differentially moderate the relationship between depression and cognition. Specifically, APOE4 carriers with depression had worse language performance compared to those who were healthy, depressed, or APOE4 carriers. BDNFMet carriers with depression performed worse on measures of memory compared to those who were healthy, depressed, or BDNFMet carriers. The treatment of depression in APOE4 and BDNFMet carriers may reduce associated cognitive impairments. Limitations and future implications are also discussed.

Type
Poster Session 07: Developmental | Pediatrics
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023