Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:14:27.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

53 Working Memory Network Load Engagement in Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

John R. Duffy*
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Michael L Thomas
Affiliation:
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
*
Correspondence: John R. Duffy Colorado State University [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Cognitive deficits in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia are a core feature of the disorder. There are currently no treatments for these cognitive deficits. Our aim was to examine and compare patterns of increased versus decreased activity in the central executive network (CEN), salience network (SN), and default mode network (DMN) between healthy controls (HCs) and patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (SZs) as well as to explore the influence of task load on these networks between HCs and SZs.

Participants and Methods:

Analyses focused on a secondary dataset comprising Blood Oxygen-Level Dependent (BOLD) data collected from 25 HCs and 27 SZs who completed a working memory (WM) task (N-back) with 5 load conditions while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Region of interest (ROI) data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

Results:

Group activation differences were found in the posterior salience network (pSN), default mode network (DMN), dorsal default mode network (dDMN), and ventral default mode network (vDMN) showing greater activity for SZs. Specifically, pSN, DMN, dDMN, and vDMN all showed increased activity in SZs compared to HCs. The curve of brain activity was consistent between HCs and SZs with the exception of the vDMN, where HCs show greater activation at modest mental workload (quadratic curve) and SZs showed greater brain activation at lower mental workload (linear). In the CEN, there were no group differences, and the response curve was the same for both groups.

Conclusions:

These group differences demonstrate network difference between HCs and SZs and could show value in treatments targeting cognitive deficits in SZs from a large-scale brain network connectivity perspective. Future studies are needed to confirm these results with larger sample size in order to examine potential subtleties of interactions between these networks.

Type
Poster Session 10: Late Breaking Science
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023