Cognitive flexibility, typically measured using neuropsychological tasks of set-shifting, has been associated with mental and physical health, social relationships, resilience, and overall quality of life (Diamond, 2013; Chen et al., 2014; Davis et al., 2010; de Abreu et al., 2014; Genet et al., 2011). Previous research has found conflicting results regarding the relationship between set-shifting and various measures of functional outcomes in individuals with traumatic brain injury (Allanson et al., 2017). The present study examined the relationship between cognitive flexibility and adaptive functioning in individuals with acquired brain injuries (ABI).

Participants in this research are adults (n = 116) with severe, chronic ABI who completed a neuropsychological evaluation through Bancroft Neurorehab between 2012-2022. Participants ranged in age from 20.4 - 67.8 years (M = 45.8). Individuals included in data analysis completed Trails A and B, Wide Range Achievement Test, Fourth Edition (WRAT-4) Word Reading, and Texas Functional Living Scale (TFLS). Set-shifting ability was measured using Trails B and adaptive functioning was measured using the TFLS. Word reading ability, measured using the WRAT-4, was included as a covariate to account for the impact of word reading difficulties on Trails B performance.

A simple linear regression was conducted to examine if Trails B T-score (M = 24.7) and WRAT-4 Word Reading Standard Score (M = 87.8) predicted TFLS Total T-score (M = 35.8). The overall regression model was statistically significant (R2 = .351, F(2, 113) = 32.0, p < .001). It was found that lower performances on Trails B (ß = .272, p <.001) and WRAT-4 Word Reading (ß = .189, p <.001) both significantly predicted a lower TFLS Total T-score.

Set-shifting and word reading ability significantly predicted the overall adaptive functioning score on the TFLS which adds to a body of literature that suggests that the ability to think and behave flexibly affects functional aspects of everyday living. These findings are consistent with previous literature regarding the association between cognitive flexibility and adaptive functioning in the general population, and these results add to the growing body of research on cognitive flexibility in individuals with brain injury. Clinicians may use an individual’s set-shifting performance to estimate and further assess potential difficulties in completing activities of daily living. This information may assist in subsequent treatment planning and identifying treatment goals of cognitive rehabilitation consistent with rehabilitation psychology’s goals of increasing levels of adaptive functioning and quality of life (Division 22 of the American Psychological Association, n.d.). Future research may examine if certain domains of adaptive functioning are more or less affected by impairments in cognitive flexibility. Future research may also examine patterns of set-shifting performance, such as sequencing errors vs. set-loss errors, associated with specific areas of insult.