Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T19:20:06.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 Cognitive Rehabilitation and Mindfulness Reduce Cognitive Complaints in Multiple Sclerosis (REMIND-MS): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2023

Roy P.C. Kessels*
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Ilse M. Nauta
Affiliation:
Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dirk Bertens
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Luciano Fasotti
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Klimmendaal Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Jay Fieldhouse
Affiliation:
Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag
Affiliation:
Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anne E.M. Speckens
Affiliation:
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Brigit A. de Jong
Affiliation:
Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
*
Correspondence: Roy P.C. Kessels, Radboud University, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

Cognitive problems, both complaints and objective impairments, are frequent and disabling in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and profoundly affect daily living. However, intervention studies that focus on cognitive problems that patients experience in their daily lives are limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on patient-reported cognitive complaints in MS.

Participants and Methods:

In this randomized-controlled trial, MS patients with cognitive complaints completed questionnaires and underwent neuropsychological assessments at baseline, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. Patient-reported cognitive complaints were primarily investigated. Secondary outcomes included personalized cognitive goals and objective cognitive function. CRT and MBCT were compared to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) using linear mixed models.

Results:

Patients were randomized into CRT (n=37), MBCT (n=36) or ETAU (n=37), of whom 100 completed the study. Both CRT and MBCT positively affected patient-reported cognitive complaints compared to ETAU at post-treatment (p<.05), but not 6 months later. At 6-month follow-up, CRT had a positive effect on personalized cognitive goals (p=.028) and MBCT on processing speed (p=.027). Patients with less cognitive complaints at baseline benefited more from CRT on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (i.e. primary outcome measuring cognitive complaints) at post-treatment (p=.012-.040), and those with better processing speed at baseline benefited more from MBCT (p=.016).

Conclusions:

Both CRT and MBCT alleviated cognitive complaints in MS patients immediately after treatment completion, but these benefits did not persist. In the long term, CRT showed benefits on personalized cognitive goals and MBCT on processing speed. These results thereby provide insight in the specific contributions of available cognitive treatments for MS patients.

Type
Poster Session 04: Aging | MCI
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023