Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:17:19.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VARIATION ON A THEME BY KISELEV AND NAZAROV: HÖLDER ESTIMATES FOR NONLOCAL TRANSPORT-DIFFUSION, ALONG A NON-DIVERGENCE-FREE BMO FIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2021

Ioann Vasilyev
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Est, LAMA, UMR 8050, UPEC, UPEM, CNRS, 61, avenue du Général de Gaulle, CréteilF94010, France ([email protected])
François Vigneron
Affiliation:
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Reims, UMR 9008, Moulin de la Housse, BP 1039, Reims cedex251687 ([email protected])

Abstract

We prove uniform Hölder regularity estimates for a transport-diffusion equation with a fractional diffusion operator and a general advection field in of bounded mean oscillation, as long as the order of the diffusion dominates the transport term at small scales; our only requirement is the smallness of the negative part of the divergence in some critical Lebesgue space. In comparison to a celebrated result by Silvestre, our advection field does not need to be bounded. A similar result can be obtained in the supercritical case if the advection field is Hölder continuous. Our proof is inspired by Kiselev and Nazarov and is based on the dual evolution technique. The idea is to propagate an atom property (i.e., localisation and integrability in Lebesgue spaces) under the dual conservation law, when it is coupled with the fractional diffusion operator.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosio, L. and Trevisan, D., Lecture notes on the DiPerna-Lions theory in abstract measure spaces, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, XXVI 4 (2017), 729766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresch, D. and Jabin, P.-E., Quantitative regularity estimates for compressible transport equations, in New Trends and Results in Mathematical Description of Fluid Flows (Birkhäuser, Cham, Switzerland, 2018), 77113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffarelli, L. A. and Vasseur, A., Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi-geostrophic equation, Ann. Math. 171(3) (2010) 19031930.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Cordoba, D. and Wu, J., On the critical dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 50 (2001), 97107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantin, P., Glatt-Holtz, N. and Vicol, V., Unique ergodicity for fractionally dissipated, stochastically forced 2d-Euler equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 330 (2014) 819857.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Tarfulea, A. and Vicol, V., Long time dynamics of forced critical SQG, Commun. Math. Phys. 335(1) (2015), 93141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordoba, A. and Cordoba, D., A maximum principle applied to quasi-geostrophic equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 249 (2004), 511528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabkowski, M., Eventual regularity of the solutions to the supercritical dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Geom. Funct. Anal. 21(1) (2011), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danchin, R., Estimates in Besov spaces for transport and transport-diffusion equations with almost Lipschitz coefficients, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 21(3) (2005), 863888.Google Scholar
De Lellis, C., Notes on hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and transport equations, in Handbook of Differential Equations: Evolutionary Equations Vol. 3, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 2007), pp. 277382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiPerna, R. J. and Lions, P. L., Ordinary differential equations, transport theory and Sobolev spaces, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), 511547.Google Scholar
Golse, F. and Vasseur, A., Hölder regularity for hypoelliptic kinetic equations with rough diffusion coefficients. 2015, arXiv:1506.01908.Google Scholar
Hmidi, T. and Zerguine, M., On the global well-posedness of the Euler-Boussinesq system with fractional dissipation, Physica D 239(15) (2010), 13871401.Google Scholar
Imbert, C., Shvydkoy, R. and Vigneron, F., Global well-posedness of a non-local Burgers equation: the periodic case, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, XXV 4 (2016), 723758.Google Scholar
Kiselev, A. and Nazarov, F., Variation on a theme of Caffarelli and Vasseur, J. Math. Sci. 166(1) (2010), 3139.Google Scholar
Kiselev, A., Nazarov, F. and Volberg, A., Global well-posedness for the critical 2D dissipative quasi-geostrophic equation, Invent. Math. 167(3) (2007), 445453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kružkov, S. N., First order quasilinear equations in several independent variables, Mat. USSR Sbornik 10(2) (1970), 217243.Google Scholar
Le Bris, C. and Lions, P.-L., Parabolic equations with irregular data and related issues, De Gruyter Series in Applied and Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 4 (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2019). Google Scholar
Mouhot, C., De Giorgi-Nash-Moser and Hörmander theories: new interplay. 2018, arXiv:1808.00194.Google Scholar
Silvestre, L., Hölder estimates for advection fractional-diffusion equations, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 11 (2012), 843855.Google Scholar
Silvestre, L. and Vicol, V., Hölder continuity for a drift-diffusion equation with pressure, Ann. I.H.P. Analyse non linéaire 29(4) (2012), 637652.Google Scholar
Stein, E. M., Harmonic Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993).Google Scholar
Talenti, G., Best constant in Sobolev inequality, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 110 (1976), 353372. Google Scholar
Vázquez, J., The mathematical theories of diffusion, in Nonlinear and Fractional Diffusion, Vol. 2186 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, New-York, 2017). Google Scholar