Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:50:05.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Valuation of Reversions and life Interests for the Purpose of Apportionment of Trust Funds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

N. Benz
Affiliation:
Equity and Law Life Assurance Society

Extract

…the solutions given…are so various as to excite no little surprise and distrust in the minds of those unacquainted with the subject, under whose notice such solutions are brought.

…a great deal of judgment and discretion must always be required from the actuary, and…it is not possible to lay down any general rule which shall altogether obviate such requirement.

The quotations above are taken from a paper by Jellicoe (J.I.A.6, 61) which was discussed by this Institute in 1855. It is a salutary thought that there are no subsequent statements recorded in J.I.A. on the subject which seem to express so succinctly the two principal points which should always be borne in mind when the apportionment of a trust fund is under consideration. It must be stated immediately, however, that since 1855 problems of apportionment have been discussed only in 1871 (J.I.A.16, 269), 1873 (J.I.A.18, 77) and 1925 (J.I.A.56, 243); indeed, reversions and life interests have scarcely been mentioned in Institute discussions since 1935, when O. I'A. Thurston presented his paper on Death Duties (J.I.A.66, 369).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 151 note * Though throughout the paper the life tenant has been assumed to be female and the reversioner to be male, the arguments are of general application.

page 159 note * See § A8

page 184 note * J.I.A. 53, 1.