Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:47:21.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objectives and methods of funding defined benefit pension schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

D. J. D. McLeish  and
C. M. Stewart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Objective of Funding

1.1. As every actuarial student is taught:

‘Pay-as-you-go is acceptable for a State pension scheme because the State is, for practical purposes, assured of a continuing existence.’

However:

‘The position is quite different in the case of an occupational scheme, since an employer's business may cease to exist.’

1.2. It seems to us to follow, therefore, that the prime purpose of funding an occupational pension scheme must be to secure the accrued benefits, whatever they might be, in the event of the employer being unable or unwilling to continue to pay at some time in the future. To that end, the contributions would have to be sufficient both to pay the benefits as they fell due for as long as the scheme continued, and also to establish and maintain a fund which would be sufficient to secure the accrued benefits in the event of contributions ceasing and the scheme being discontinued, whenever that might occur.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , September 1987 , pp. 155 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1). Lee, E.M. An Introduction to Pension Schemes.Google Scholar
(2). Terminology of Pension Funding Methods. The Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Acturaries, 1984.Google Scholar
(3). Pension Scheme Surpluses (Valuation) Regulations, 1987. (S.I. 1987, 412)Google Scholar
(4) Accounting for Pension Costs. Exposure Draft 39. The Accounting Standards Committee, May 1986.Google Scholar
(5) In Re Hillsdown Holdings Ltd and others v. Imperial Foods Ltd and others.Google Scholar
(6) McLeish, D.J.D. Financial Control of Pension Funds. Pensions World, November 1978.Google Scholar
(7) McLeish, D.J.D. Setting a Standard for Pension Costs. Accountancy, March 1980.Google Scholar
(8) Colbran, R.B. Valuation of Final Salary Pension Schemes, J.I.A., 109, 359.Google Scholar
(9) Mcleish, D.J.D. A Financial Framework for Pension Funds. T.F.A., 38, 267.Google Scholar
(10) Stewart, C.M. Pension Problems and their Solution. J.I.A., 110, 289.Google Scholar
(11) Field, J.L. Projections of the Costs of Occupational Pensions. J.I.A., 110, 243.Google Scholar
(12) Employers Accounting for Pensions. Statement No. 87 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, U.S.A., December 1985.Google Scholar
(13) In Re George Newnes Group Pension Fund, 3 July 1969. J.I.A., 98, 251.Google Scholar
(14) Guidance Note GN 9. Retirement Benefit Schemes — Actuarial Reports. The Institute of Actuaries and the Faculty of Actuaries.Google Scholar
(15) Pension Cost Method Analysis. The American Academy of Actuaries Committee on Pension Actuarial Principles and Practices, 1985.Google Scholar
(16) Stewart, C.M. The Students' Society Log, 1960–1985.Google Scholar