Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:20:23.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on Summation Formulas of Graduation, with certain new Formulas for consideration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Extract

The main object of my paper on the Error introduced into Mortality Tables by Summation Formulas of Graduation, published at page 54 of the present volume of the Journal, has already been to a large extent fulfilled; and the admirable papers which it has called forth from Messrs. Lidstone and Spencer are a liberal reward for my labours. That object was, to show that the theoretical error in question is so small as to be quite insignificant; and thereby to bring summation formulas up again for discussion, with a view to ascertain which of them are the best as means of graduation pure and simple, and how they can be used most effectively.

In the concluding sentences of the paper I spoke of a graduation by summation, to be followed, in order to gain smoothness, by one by the graphic method; and in the reply to the discussion I casually threw out the idea of correcting the theoretical error by means of the fourth central difference; but these suggestions were only concessions to the misgivings of weaker brethren, and were not put forward seriously as being in my own opinion either necessary or desirable. I am convinced that we have now summation formulas which give as smooth graduations as need be desired, and the results of which conform with close accuracy to the original facts; and, emphasizing what has already been said, my own view is that the theoretical error they introduce is so minute as to be unworthy of consideration for a moment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 534 note * Mr. Spencer writes u ±h for γh, but it seems better to retain the original notation of Mr. Woolhouse.

page 554 note * See the shorter form, Postscript, p. 559.

page 555 note * See the shorter form, Postscript, p. 559.