Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:07:27.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the magnitude of accumulated and inherited wealth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Extract

1.1. The distribution of personal sector wealth between individuals is far more unequal than the distribution of incomes of individuals. Whereas in 1974 the wealthiest 5% owned 47% of all marketable wealth of the personal sector in this country, the share of the top 5% of incomes was much lower at about 20% of total incomes from all sources (before tax). Life-cycle factors would have contributed to this difference because those nearing retirement have had more opportunity to accumulate savings than those early in their careers. But, as will be seen later, such factors provide only a partial explanation and it has become apparent that the greater inequality in the distribution of wealth is due largely to the incidence of other sources of wealth, such as inheritances. In order to throw more light on the processes which have led to the present distribution of wealth it is necessary to consider models of the build-up of savings out of earnings and, also, methods of estimating the overall size and distribution of inherited wealth. These are the main purposes of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Report No. 5 of the Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth: Third Report on the Standing Reference (Cmnd 6999). HMSO, November 1977.Google Scholar
(2) Oulton, N. Inheritance and Distribution of Wealth. Oxford Economic Papers, March 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Atkinson, A. B. The Distribution of Wealth and the Individual Life Cycle. Oxford Economic Papers, July 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Flemming, J. S. Selected Evidence Submitted to the Royal Commission for Report No. 1. HMSO, 1976.Google Scholar
(5) Report No. 1 of the Royal Commission: Initial Report on the Standing Reference (Cmnd 6171). HMSO, July 1975.Google Scholar