No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 February 2017
Page 85, penultimate line to read: ‘were suspended, not merely for a few days, to be followed shortly in 2 by the’
Page 86, third line. For ‘Three’ read ‘There’.
Part 1, back cover and Part 3, contents list of volume. Seventh item: For ‘1976’ read ‘1977’.
Page 209, third line. For ‘Hutchinson’ read ‘Heinemann’.
Page 301, fourth line of fourth paragraph of Mr Hey's remarks. For ‘Integrals’ read ‘intervals’.
Page 304. Mr Carter's remarks should begin:
‘I think the definition of ‘provision’ in the Companies Act is easy to understand: it is any amount set aside to meet a known liability, the amount of which cannot be determined with substantial accuracy. A ‘reserve’ is anything which is not a ‘provision’!
Page 305. Ninth line of first paragraph of Professor Cox's remarks. For ‘Coshy’ read ‘Cauchy’.