Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:59:13.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Variations in Masculinity under different conditions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

John Norman Lewis  and
Charles James Lewis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In submitting to the Institute the results of our investigation into the subject of masculinity, we are aware that this theme is somewhat outside the ordinary discussions of the Institute, and we only propose to deal with certain aspects of the question. It may therefore be well to begin by defining the term masculinity, which is simply a convenient expression for stating in one word the proportion of the sexes at birth. The choice of this word has been determined by the fact that male births generally predominate in number over female births. According to the extent of this predominance, masculinity may be described as high or low. The usual practice is to state the number of male births to 1,000 females. When the male births are fewer than the female births the masculinity is said to be negative, the representative figure being then below 1,000.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 1906 , pp. 154 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertillon, Elements du Demographic, 1896.Google Scholar
Berner, H. En biologisk studie. Christiania, 1883.Google Scholar
Bland, . Phil. Transactions, vol. 71.Google Scholar
Bodio, L. Movimento della popolaziona, confronti internazionale. Rome, 1895.Google Scholar
Boeckh, . Statistisches Jahrbuch der Stadt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Boudin, . Bull. Soc. dAnthrop. de Paris, 1862.Google Scholar
Boudin, Gaz. Med. de Paris, 1863.Google Scholar
Boulenger, . Quoted by Stieda.Google Scholar
Breslau, . Quoted by Stieda.Google Scholar
Carlberg, . Quoted by Bauber.Google Scholar
Clark, J. Phil. Trans., vol. 76.Google Scholar
Coghlan, T. W. Decline in the birth-rate of New South Wales. Sydney, 1903.Google Scholar
Corbaux, F. The Natural and Mathematical Laws concerning Population, Vitality and Mortality. 1833.Google Scholar
Diising, C. Das Gesehlechts-Verhltniss der Geburten in Preussen. 1875-1887.Google Scholar
Diising, C. Die Regulierung des Geschlechts-Verhaltnisses. 1884.Google Scholar
Gache, S.Climatologie mdicale de la Republique Argentine.Google Scholar
Geissler, A. Zeitschrift d. K. Sachs. Statist. Bureau. Dresden, 1889.Google Scholar
Goehlert, V. Zeitschrift f. Ethn. Berlin, 1881.Google Scholar
Goehlert, V. Werner Klinik. 1890.Google Scholar
Hofacker, . Annales d'Hygiene. 1829.Google Scholar
Kiscb, E. H. Centralb. fr Gynak. Leipzig, 1887.Google Scholar
Kollman, P. Allgem. Stat. Archiv. 1890.Google Scholar
Legoyt, . Statisque de la Prance. Strasburg, 1857.Google Scholar
Maurel, . Revue Scientifique. 1903.Google Scholar
Mourgue, . Quoted by Corbaux.Google Scholar
Oehrn, E. Biostatik dreier Landkirchspiele Livlands. Dorpat, 1883.Google Scholar
Orschansky, . Die Vererbung. Stuttgart, 1903.Google Scholar
Ploss, H. Das Weib in der Natur und Vlkerkunde, Leipzig, 1885.Google Scholar
Quetelet, . Sur lHomme.Google Scholar
Quetelet, . Recherches sur la Reproduction et la Mortalit.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. Wien. Med. Blatter, 1898.Google Scholar
Sadler, . Law of Population. London, 1830.Google Scholar
Schumann, A. L. Die Sexual proportion der Geborenen. Oldenburg, 1883.Google Scholar
Stieda, W. Das Sexualverhltniss bei Geborenen. Strasburg, 1885.Google Scholar
Turquan, V. Revue Scientifique. Paris, 1896.Google Scholar
Wall, . Lancet. 1887.Google Scholar
Wargentin, . Quoted by Corbaux.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. Report on Vital Statistics of the United States to the Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York. 1857.Google Scholar