No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two Notes on Questions of Office-Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2016
Extract
In this note 1 submit for discussion two questions in connection with limited-payment policies: (1) by what method should the office premiums be calculated, and (2) how should the policies be valued. Neither of these questions appears to have been brought—except incidentally—before the Institute; both are of some practical importance in view of the large amount of limited-payment business transacted in the United Kingdom; and in regard to both there seem to be greater differences in practice than would be justified by theory. The following remarks refer more particularly to participating policies of the kind issued by the majority of British companies—that is to say, policies entitled throughout their currency to the same reversionary bonuses as similar ordinary whole-life policies—but similar considerations would apply to non-participating policies.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1915
References
page 263 note * The corresponding expression for the requisite extra reserve (in addition to has been deduced in a rather more general form by Mr. A. Fraser in his Note on “The Special Reserve required for Future Profits on Limited Payment Policies” (T.F.A., vol. vi, p. 93), to which reference should be made. The writer is indebted to Mr. Fraser for the information that in a fairly large limited-payment class of some years' standing the total reserve by the usual method was almost exactly double the true reserve, and that in that class the mortality was found to be 61 per-cent of the O[M] as compared with 74 per-cent in the whole-life class and 52 per-cent in the Endowment Assurance class—all three classes being with profits.