Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:18:52.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The matching of assets to liabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

A. J. Wise
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1.1. The concept of the matching of assets to liabilities is fundamental in matters of finance. In its broadest sense matching is relevant both to the investment of life office and pension funds and to actuarial calculations in relation to those funds.

1.2. Matching is inherently connected with the uncertainty of future conditions, as measured by such indicators as rates of interest, inflation and currency exchange. It is when conditions do not work out as hoped for or expected that the risks associated with mis-matching can materialize. Whether considering investment policy or an actuarial calculation it is important that the nature of a portfolio which minimizes these risks be appreciated, and yet it is often difficult to specify such a portfolio with precision. This may not be a source of difficulty in practice when the judgement of the actuary is applied to the problem in hand, but there is evident scope for refinement of the concepts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 445 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Haynes, A. T. & Kirton, R. J. The financial structure of a life office. T.F.A. 21, 141.Google Scholar
(2) Redington, F. M. Review of the principles of life office valuations. J.I.A. 78, 286.Google Scholar
(3) Shedden, A. D. A practical approach to applying immunisation theory. T.F.A. 35, 313.Google Scholar
(4) Boyle, P.P. Immunisation under stochastic models of the term structure. J.I.A. 105, 177.Google Scholar
(5) Tilley, J.A. The matching of assets and liabilities. T.S.A. XXXII, 263.Google Scholar
(6) Fellows, D. E. Pension fund liabilities and asset matching. J.I.A. 108, 211.Google Scholar
(7) Moore, P.G. Mathematical models in portfolio selection. J.I.A. 98, 103.Google Scholar
(8) Wise, A. J. A theoretical analysis of the matching of assets to liabilities. J.I.A. 111, 375.Google Scholar
(9) Markowitz, H. M. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance. VII, No. 1, 1952, 77.Google Scholar
(10) Wegner, P. A quadratic programming formulation of the portfolio selection model. J.S.S. 16, 468.Google Scholar
(11) Benjamin, S. The theory of games and its application to rate of interest. J.I.A. 85, 373Google Scholar
(12) Colbran, R. B. Valuation of final-salary pension schemes. J.I.A. 109, 359.Google Scholar
(13) Johnston, E. A. The comparative value of pensions. J.I.A. 109, 1.Google Scholar
(14) Holbrook, J. P. Investment performance of pension funds. J.I.A. 104, 15.Google Scholar
(15) Fama, E. F. Risk and the evaluation of pension fund portfolio performance. (Supplement to the Bank Administration Institute Report).Google Scholar
(16) Gilley, D. F. The dissolution of a pension fund. J.I.A. 98, 179.Google Scholar
(17) Francis, P. R. Solvency of a pension scheme—a case history. J.I.A. 106, 319.Google Scholar