Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:23:20.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Criteria of smoothness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Extract

1.1 The actuarial profession has for decades, indeed centuries, used age-related tables, particularly (although not exclusively) of mortality, which in preparation have been subjected to the process known as graduation. Five purposes of such graduation have recently been set out by Vallin, Pollard and Heligman and these may be summarized as follows:

(1) to smooth the data, make them easier to handle, remove irregularities and inconsistencies;

(2) to make the result more precise on the reasonable assumption that the real mortality underlying the observations is a smooth curve, i.e. to remove sampling and other errors;

(3) to aid inferences from incomplete data;

(4) to facilitate comparisons of mortality;

(5) to aid forecasting.

Of these purposes, (1), (2) and (3) may all be paraphrazed as implying that the purposes are to make the table smooth, and (4) and (5) as indicating uses to which a table may better be put if smoothed. So the purposes of what the profession has come to term ‘graduation’ all boil down to the production of a smooth table, and for the rest of this paper until the last section I shall use the word ‘smoothing’ rather than ‘graduation’. But what is smooth?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Apostol, TOM M. (1974). Mathematical Analysis, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
(2) Barnett, H. A. R. (1950). Graduation Tests and Experiments. J.I.A. 77, 1.Google Scholar
(3) Benjamin, B. & Pollard, J. H. (1980). The Analysis of Mortality and Other Actuarial Statistics. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
(4) Bizley, M. T. L. (1957). A measure of Smoothness. J.I.A. 84, 125.Google Scholar
(5) Copas, J. B. & Haberman, S. (1983). Non-parametric Graduation using Kernel Methods. J.I.A. 110, 135.Google Scholar
Daw, R. H. (1980). Johann Heinrich Lambert (1728–1777). J.I.A. 107, 345.Google Scholar
Elphinstone, M. D. W. (1950) Summation and some Other Methods of Graduation—the Foundations of Theory. T.F.A. 20, 15.Google Scholar
Giles, P. & Wilkie, A. D. (1975). Recent Mortality Trends. Some International Comparisons. T.F.A. 33, 5.Google Scholar
Lambert, J. H. (1772). Anmerkungen über die Sterblichkeit, Todtenlisten, Geburthen und Ehen. Beyträge zum Gebrauche der Mathematik und deren Anwendung, Volume III. (Published in Berlin.)Google Scholar
Tetley, H. (1950). Actuarial Statistics. Volume 1 (2nd ed.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vallin, J., Pollard, J. H. & Heligman, L. (1984). Methodologies for the Collection and Analysis of Mortality Data. Ordina Editions. Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, W. S. B. (1870). Explanation of a New Method of adjusting Mortality Tables. J.I.A. 15, 389.Google Scholar