Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:53:58.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women Economists in the 1890s: Journals, Books and the Old Palgrave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Robert W. Dimand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Just over a century ago two noteworthy books in economics were published by women, contrary to the widespread modern impression that women's participation in economics is a recent phenomenon. Charlotte Perkins Gilman published Women and Economics (1898a, cf. Gilman 1898b), a landmark work of feminist and institutionalist economics (see M. A. Dimand 1995b). Rosa Luxemburg published The Industrial Development of Poland (1898) based on her 1897 Zurich doctoral dissertation. This distinguished contribution showed promise of the great abilities displayed in her magnum opus, The Accumulation of Capital (1913), a study that deserves recognition for its importance in macrodynamics and the theory of economic growth as well as in Marxian economics (see Joan Robinson's introduction to the 1951 translation). These two authors stand as giants in the history of economics–or would do so, if historians of economics were paying attention–but they were very far from being the only women contributing to economics in the 1890s.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 269 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

References

REFERENCES

Acton, Janice, Penny, Goldsmith, and Bonnie, Shepard, eds. 1974. Women at Work: Ontario 1850–1930. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Adelaide M. 1895. “Joint Associations of Employers and Employed in France and Belgium,” Economic Journal 5 (December): 641–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badham, Edith A. 1895. “Women and Womanhood Suffrage.” The Australian Economist 4 (14): 479–84, with discussion by Rose Scott, 4 (15): 492–94, and by Rose Scott, Rev. Dr. Bevan, Miss McKenny, Miss Tilley and others, 4 (16): 495–502.Google Scholar
Badham, Edith A. 1896. “Private and Public Schools Compared.” The Australian Economist 4 (30): 607–10, with discussion by Prof. W. Scott and Miss Tilley, 4 (31): 619–22, discussion by Miss McKenny and a reply by Badham, 1897, 5 (1): 2–6.Google Scholar
Balch, Emily Greene. 1893. “Public Assistance of the Poor in France.” Publications of the American Economic Association, First Series 8 (4–5): 1–180.Google Scholar
Barton, Dorothea M. 1919. “The Course of Women's Wages.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 82 (July): 508–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Dorothea M. 1921. “Women's Minimum Wages.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 84 (July): 528–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1985. “On Method in U. S. Economics a Century Earlier.” American Economic Review 75 (December): 1–12.Google Scholar
Beilharz, Peter and Chris, Nyland. 1998. The Webbs, Fabianism and Feminism. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Berg, Maxine. 1992. “The First Women Economic Historians.” Economic History Review 45 (May): 308–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besant, Annie. 1889. “Industry Under Socialism.” In George Bernard, Shaw, ed., Fabian Essays on Socialism. Reprinted Garden City, NY: Doubleday, no date: 187–209.Google Scholar
Black, Anne and Barbara, Bradby. 1899. “Women Compositors and the Factory Acts.” Economic Journal 9 (June): 261–66.Google Scholar
Black, Clementina. 1904. “London's Tailoresses.” Economic Journal 14 (December): 555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1895. “The Use and Value of Census Statistics.” Journal of Political Economy 4 (December): 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1897. “Some Oddities of Statistical Method.” Journal of Political Economy 6 (December): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1898. “Census Statistics of Unemployment.” Journal of Political Economy 6 (March): 250–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1899. “An Error in the Use of Statistics of Population.” Journal of Political Economy 8 (December): 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1901. “New York Labor Statistics.” Journal of Political Economy 9 (March): 272–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H. (Helen) L. 1905. “Census Statistics of Child Labor.” Journal of Political Economy 13 (March): 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondfield, Margaret G. 1899. “Conditions Under Which Shop Assistants Work.” Economic Journal 9 (June): 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondfield, Margaret G. 1928. “The Meaning of Trade.” In Self and Society, First Twelve Essays: Social and Economic Problems from the Neglected Point of View of the Consumer. London: Ernest Benn.Google Scholar
Booth, Charles, ed. 1902. Life and Labour of the People in London. London: Macmillan. 1970.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Helen Dendy. 1891. “The Causes of Poverty.” Economic Journal 1 (December): 808–10.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Helen Dendy. 1893. “The Industrial Residuum.” Economic Journal 3 (December): 600–16.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Helen Dendy. 1896. “The Burden of Small Debts.” Economic Journal 6 (June): 212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, Helen Dendy. 1897. “The Lines of Industrial Conflict.” Economic Journal 7 (December): 503–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, Alice Rollins. 1894. “Early Experiments with the Unemployed.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 9 (October): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Sophie Willock. 1894. “Educational Finance.” Economic Journal 4 (March): 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, F. M. 1899. “International Congress of Women.” Economic Journal 9 (September): 450–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, Noel G., Fitzgerald, V. W., and Scott, R. H., eds. 1986. The Australian Economist 1888–1898, 2 volumes, facsimile ed. Sydney: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, Alice Rhinehart. 1898. “The Workman in Berlin.” Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association 6 (June): 102–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Helen. 1887. Prisoners of Poverty: Women Wage Workers, Their Trades and Their Lives. Boston: Roberts Brothers, reprinted Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, 1970.Google Scholar
Campbell, Helen. 1893. Women Wage-Earners: Their Past, Their Present and Their Future, with an introduction by Richard T. Ely. Boston: Roberts Brothers.Google Scholar
Campbell, Helen. 1896. Household Economics. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. M. 1926. “The Employment of Married Women.” Economic Record 2 (November): 271–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, Clara Elizabeth. 1891a. “Wages and the Standard of Living.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 5 (April): 365–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, Clara Elizabeth. 1891b. “Reports of the Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor on Working Women, 1870–1889.” Economic Journal 1 (June): 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, Clara Elizabeth. 1891c. “Women's Work in Leeds.” Economic Journal 1 (September): 460–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, Clara Elizabeth. 1898a. “The Collection and Utilisation of Official Statistics Bearing on the Extent and Effects of the Industrial Employment of Women.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 61 (June): 219–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collet, Clara Elizabeth. 1898b. “The Expenditure of Middle Class Working Women.” Economic Journal 8 (12): 543–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1893. “Wages and Prices in England, 1261–1701.” Journal of Political Economy 2 (December): 92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1903. “History of Contract Labor in the Hawaiian Islands.” Publications of the American Economic Association, Third Series, 4 (3): 1–74.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1904. “The Negro as Peasant Farmer.” Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association 9 (June): 39–54. Reprinted in Darity, Jr., William A., ed., Economics and Discrimination, Volume I. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1911a. “Some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation.” American Economic Review 1 (March): 1–19.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1911b. “Government Factories: An Attempt to Control Competition in the Fur Trade.” American Economic Review Supplement 1 (April): 368–88.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1912. Economic Beginnings of the Far West. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted New York: A. M. Kelley, 1969.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1915. Unemployment Insurance: A Summary of European Systems. New York: Progressive National Service.Google Scholar
Coman, Katharine. 1917. Industrial History of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cunningham, William and Ellen, McArthur. 1895. Outlines of English Industrial History. London: Macmillan; 4th ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1928.Google Scholar
Davenport, Frances Gardiner. 1897. “The Agricultural Changes in the Fifteenth Century.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 11 (01): 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport-Hill, Florence. 1893. “The System of Boarding-Out Pauper Children.” Economic Journal 3 (03): 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Katharine Bement. 1898. “Tables Relating to the Price of Wheat and Other Farm Products Since 1890.” Journal of Political Economy 6 (06): 403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Katharine Bement. 1899. “An Error in Austrian Wage Statistics.” Journal of Political Economy 8 (12): 102–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Katharine Bement. 1900a. “The Condition of the Negro in Philadelphia.” Journal of Political Economy 8 (03): 248–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Katharine Bement. 1900b. “The Modern Condition of Agricultural Labor in Bohemia.” Journal of Political Economy 8 (09): 491–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Katharine Bement. 1929. Factors in the Sex Life of Twenty-Two Hundred Women. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted Arno Press: New York, 1972.Google Scholar
Deverell, Edith. 1898. “Shop Benefit Clubs.” Economic Journal 8 (01): 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deverell, Edith. 1899. “Slate Clubs.” Economic Journal 9 (06): 266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Ethel B. 1928. “The Plight of the Lancashire Cotton Industry.” American Economic Review 18 (09): 468–76.Google Scholar
Dimand, Mary Ann. 1995a. “Networks of Women Economists Before 1940.” In Mary Ann, Dimand, Dimand, Robert W., and Forget, Evelyn L., eds., Women of Value: Feminist Essays on the History of Women in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 39–59.Google Scholar
Dimand, Mary Ann. 1995b. “The Economics of Charlotte Perkins Gilman.” In Mary Ann, Dimand, Dimand, Robert W., and Forget, Evelyn L., eds., Women of Value: Feminist Essays on the History of Women in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 124–49.Google Scholar
Dimand, Mary Ann, Dimand, Robert W., and Forget, Evelyn L., eds. 1995. Women of Value: Feminist Essays on the History of Women in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 1995. “The Neglect of Women's Contributions to Economics.” In Mary Ann, Dimand, Dimand, Robert W., and Forget, Evelyn L., eds., Women of Value: Feminist Essays on the History of Women in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1–24.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 1998. “Women in the Canon of Economics.” Presented to “Reflecting on the Canon: A Conference in Honour of Sam Hollander.” Toronto, September.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W., Mary Ann, Dimand, and Forget, Evelyn L., eds. In preparation. Biographical Dictionary of Women Economists. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, and Lyme, NH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, E. 1895. “Craftswomen in the Livre des métiers.” Economic Journal 5 (06): 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Dorothy Wolff. 1920. “The Cost of Living for Working Women: A Criticism of Current Theories.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 34 (02): 225–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Dorothy Wolff. 1940. “Land and Labor in Mexico.” Science and Society 4 (2): 127–52.Google Scholar
Douglas, Dorothy Wolff. 1953. Transitional Economic Systems: The Polish-Czech Example. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul and Dorothy Wolff, Douglas. 1921. “What Can a Man Afford?” American Economic Review Supplement 11 (March): 1–95. Also in What Can a Man Afford? Two Essays Awarded the Karelsen Prizes by the American Economic Association. Princeton NJ, and New Haven, CT: American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Eaton, Isabel. 1895. “Receipts and Expenditures of Certain Wage-Earners in the Garment Trades.” Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association 4 (06): 135–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, John, Murray, Milgate, and Peter, Newman, eds. 1987. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 4 volumes. London: Stockton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Henry and Fawcett, Millicent G.. 1872. Essays and Lectures on Social and Political Subjects. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Millicent G. 1870. Political Economy for Beginners. London and Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Millicent G. 1874. Tales for Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Millicent G. “Mr. Sidney Webb's Article on Women's Wages.” Economic Journal 2 (03): 173–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Millicent G. 1918. “Equal Pay for Equal Work.” Economic Journal 28 (03): 1–6. Reprinted in Darity, William A., Jr., ed., Economics and Discrimination, Volume 1. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Felton, Katharine. 1898. “Rousiers's Theory of the Evolution of the Laborer.” Journal of Political Economy 6 (06): 380–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Lettice. 1899. “Labourers's Dwellings.” Economic Journal 9 (12): 605–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Lettice. 1902. “Local Authorities and the Housing Problem in 1901.” Economic Journal 12 (06): 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Lettice. 1905. “The Town Housing Problem.” Economic Journal 15 (03): 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Caroline A. 1893. “Fashion.” Economic Journal 3 (09): 458–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullbrook, Edward. 1998. “Caroline Foley and the Theory of Intersubjective Demand.” Journal of Economic Issues 32 (Fall): 709–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1898a. Women and Economics: The Economic Factor Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Evolution. Boston: Small, Maynard. Reprinted with an introduction by Carl N. Degler, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1966; reprinted Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1898b. “Economic Basis of the Woman Question.” Woman's Journal 1 (10). Partially reprinted in Aileen, Kraditor, ed., Up From the Pedestal: Landmark Writings in the American Woman's Struggle for Equality. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1903. The Home: Its Work and Influence. Reprinted New York: New York Source Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Gordon, Florence. 1894. “The Condition of Female Labour and the Rates of Women's Wages in Sydney.” The Australian Economist 4 (7): 423–29, and “Women's Work and Wages: Reply.” The Australian Economist, 4 (10): 454, and 4 (11): 459–60, with discussion by W. McMillan, 4 (7) 429–30, by Miss Tilley, 4 (8): 437–38, and general discussion, 4 (9): 444–46.Google Scholar
Graffenreid, Clare de. 1890. “Child-Labor.” In Willoughby, W. F. and Clare de, Graffenreid, “Two Essays on Child-Labor.” Publications of the American Economic Association, First Series 5 (2).Google Scholar
Groenewegen, Peter D., ed. 1994. Feminism and Political Economy in Victorian England. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, Peter D. and Susan, King. 1994. “Women as Producers of Economic Articles: A Statistical Assessment of the Nature and Extent of Female Participation in Five British and North American Journals 1900–1939.” University of Sydney Working Papers in Economics no. 201.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. and Barbara, Hammond. 1911. The Village Labourer, 1760–1832. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. 1917. The Town Labourer, 1760–1832. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. L. 1919. The Skilled Labourer, 1760–1832. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hardy, S. (Sara) McLean. 1895. “The Quantity of Money and Prices, 1860–1891: An Inductive Study.” Journal of Political Economy 3 (03): 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazard, Blanche E. 1913. “The Organization of the Boot and Shoe Industry in Massachusetts Before 1875.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 27 (02): 236–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heather-Bigg, Ada. 1894. “The Wife's Contribution to Family Income.” Economic Journal 4 (03): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewart, Beatrice. 1898. “The Wages of London Vestry Employees.” Economic Journal 8 (09): 407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewart, Beatrice. 1900. “The Cloth Trade in the North of England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” Economic Journal 10 (03): 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Caroline M. 1904. “The Economic Value of the Home.” Journal of Political Economy 12 (06): 408–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Mary A. 1980. Charlotte Perkins Gilman: The Making of a Radical Feminist, 1860–1896. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hodge, Margaret. 1898. “Technical Education in Germany.” The Australian Economist 6 (4): 25–29.Google Scholar
Hogarth, Janet E. 1896. “The German Insurance Laws.” Economic Journal 6 (06): 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Florence. 1989. “Practical in Her Theories: Theresa McMahon, 1878–1961.” In Geraldine Jonçich, Clifford, ed., Lone Voyagers: Academic Women in Coeducational Institutions, 1870–1937. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York, 223–80.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Bessie Leigh. 1899–1900. “Notes Towards the History of London Wages.” Economic Journal 9 (12): 599–605, and 10 (March): 103–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Bessie Leigh. 1915. Women in Modern Industry. London: G. Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Bessie Leigh and Harrison, A.. 1903. A History of Factory Legislation. London: P. S. King & Son, 3rd ed. 1926.Google Scholar
Hutt, W. H. 1964. The Economics of the Colour Bar. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Henriette. 1899. “Domestic Servants in Germany: Their Economic, Social and Legal Position.” Economic Journal 9 (12): 625–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayawardena, Kumari. 1995. The White Woman's Other Burden: Western Women and South Asia During British Colonial Rule. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knowles, Lillian C. A. 1921. The Industrial and Commercial Revolutions in Great Britain During the Nineteenth Century. London: George Routledge & Sons, 7th ed. 1930.Google Scholar
Knowles, Lillian C. A. 1924. The Economic Development of the British Overseas Empire, 1763–1914. London: George Routledge & Sons (Volume II, with C. M. Knowles, 1930).Google Scholar
Knowles, Lillian C. A. 1932. Economic Development in the Nineteenth Century: France, Germany, Russia and the United States. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
Kyrk, Hazel. 1923. A Theory of Consumption. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin, The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Kyrk, Hazel. 1933. Economic Problems of the Family. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Levetus, Amelia Sarah. 1897. “Working Women in Vienna.” Economic Journal 7 (03): 101–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. 1898. The Industrial Development of Poland. Leipzig. Trans. Tessa DeCarlo with introduction by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. New York: Campaigner Publications, 1977.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. 1913. The Accumulation of Capital. Trans. Agnes Schwarzschild with introduction by Joan Robinson. London: Routledge, and New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Louisa. 1893. “The Economic Position of Women.” The Australian Economist 3 (11): 367–72, with discussion by Professor Scott, Hon. MrHeydon, L. F.. , Duckworth, and Hurst, J. Jr, 4 (1): 375–81.Google Scholar
Malveaux, Julianne. 1991. “Missed Opportunity: Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander and the Economics Profession.” American Economic Review 81 (05) 307–10. Reprinted in Boston, Thomas D., ed., A Different Vision, Volume 1: African American Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred and Mary Paley, Marshall. 1879. Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan. Reprinted with introduction by D. P. O'Brien, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Marshall, Mary Paley. 1896. “Notes and Memoranda: Conference of Women Workers.” Economic Journal 6 (03): 107–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Mary Paley. 1902. “Educated Working Women by Clara E. Collet.” Economic Journal 12: 252–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBriar, A. M. 1987. An Edwardian Mixed Double: The Bosanquets versus the Webbs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, Theresa Schmid. 1912. Women and Economic Evolution. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Bulletin No. 496.Google Scholar
McLean, Annie Marion. 1899. “Factory Legislation for Women in Canada.” American Journal of Sociology 5(2): 172–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, Emily Fogg. 1901. “The Place of Advertising in Modern Business.” Journal of Political Economy 9 (03): 218–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Annie, ed. 1891. Women's Work in America. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, Dorothy Johnson. 1929. “Agrarian Problems of Modern Japan, Parts I and II.” Journal of Political Economy 37 (04): 129–49, and (06): 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Christabel. 1895a. “The Slums of Great Cities.” Economic Journal 5 (09): 474–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Christabel. 1895b. “Review: Trade Depression in Maine, USA.” Economic Journal 5 (09): 476–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Christabel. 1898. “Railway Brotherhoods in the United States.” Economic Journal 8 (12): 577–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palgrave, R. H. I., ed. 1894–99. Dictionary of Political Economy, 3 vols. London: Macmillan, 1910.Google Scholar
Polkinghorn, Bette A. and Dorothy Lampen, Thompson. 1998. Adam Smith's Daughters: Eight Prominent Women Economists from the Eighteenth Century to the Present. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Beatrice. 1891. The Co-operative Movement in Great Britain. London: Swann Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Pujol, Michèle. 1992. Feminism and Anti-Feminism in Early Economic Thought. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Reprinted with introduction by Janet A. Seiz, 1998.Google Scholar
Salmon, Lucy Maynard. 1892. “A Statistical Inquiry Concerning Domestic Service.” Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association 3 (06–09): 89–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Lucy Maynard. 1897. Domestic Service. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scott, Jean Thompson. 1892. “The Conditions of Female Labour in Ontario.” Toronto University Studies in Political Science, First Series, No. III.Google Scholar
Scott, Rose. 1894. “Remarks on Presidential Address.” The Australian Economist 4 (6): 421–22.Google Scholar
Sewall, Hannah Robie. 1901. “The Theory of Value Before Adam Smith.” Publications of the American Economic Association, Third Series, 2:3, 1–132, and New York: Macmillan. Reprinted New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968 and 1971.Google Scholar
Sewall, Hannah Robie. 1904. “Child Labor in the US.” US Bureau of Labor Bulletin 52 (05): 485–637.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Laura. 1986. Perfection Salad: Women and Cooking at the Turn of the Century. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Andrew. 1965. The Emancipation of the American Woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Smart, William. 1892. “Women's Wages.” Proceedings of the Philosophical Society of Glasgow 23: 87–105.Google Scholar
Sumner, Helen. 1910. History of Women in Industry in the United States, US Senate Report on Condition of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States, Volume IX (Doc. No. 645, 61st Congress, 2nd session), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Van der, Horst, Sheila, T. 1942. Native Labour in South Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van der, Horst, Sheila, T. 1965. “The Effects of Industrialisation on Race Relations in South Africa.” In Guy, Hunter, ed., Industrialisation and Race Relations: A Symposium. London.Google Scholar
Van der, Veen, , Margrieta. 1898a. “Homework in Berlin.” Economic Journal 8 (03): 143–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der, Veen, , Margrieta. 1898b. “The Conference on Women's Work at the Hague.” Economic Journal 8 (09): 404–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Ware, Caroline F. 1926. “The Effect of the American Embargo, 1807–1809, on the New England Cotton Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 40 (08): 673–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Caroline F. 1931. The Early New England Cotton Manufacture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Reprinted New York: Russell & Russell, 1966.Google Scholar
Ware, Caroline F., ed. 1940. The Cultural Approach to History. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Beatrice. 1896. Women and the Factory Acts, Fabian Tract No. 67. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice, Webb. 1894. The History of Trade Unionism. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice, Webb. 1896a. “The Method of Collective Bargaining.” Economic Journal 6 (03): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice, Webb. 1896b. “The Standard Rate.” Economic Journal 6 (09): 356–88.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice, Webb. 1897. Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice, Webb. 1903/1930. History of English Local Government, 1688–1835, 11 volumes, with additional essays by Keith-Lucas, B., Ponsonby, G. J., Radzinowicz, L., and Robson, W. A.. London: Frank Cass, 1963.Google Scholar
Wergeland, Agnes M. 1900–1902. “Slavery in Germanic Society During the Middle Ages, Parts I–III.” Journal of Political Economy 9 (12 1900): 98–120; 9 (06 1901): 398–422; 1 (03 1902): 230–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Harrison. 1977. The Burden of the Present: Liberal-Radical Controversy Over Southern African History. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar