Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:35:03.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Has Happened to Gustav von Schmoller in English?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Peter R. Senn
Peter R. Senn
Affiliation:
Evanston, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1954 the American Economic Association held its first session on “The International Flow of Economic Ideas.” As a discussant, the great scholar of Walras, William Jafft said, “The Iron and Bamboo Curtains of today were preceded three-quarters of a century ago by nationalistic, linguistic, and other curtains–all impending the free flow of ideas in the learned world,” (1955, 38–9). A.W. Coats later added some other obstacles, “…the unavailability of modern information retrieval methods, or perhaps a plain ornery human unwillingness to cooperate or personal dislike, all have at times been impediments to the progress of knowledge,” (1987, 66).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1989 , pp. 252 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, Walter and Weingast, Herbert (1942), The Economics of Gustav Schmoller as Revealed in His Grundriss Der Allgemeine Volkswirt-schaftlehre. Brooklin, New York: Brooklyn College.Google Scholar
Anderson, Paul Relyea (1942), “Gustav Von Schmoller (1838–1917).” In Schmitt, Bernadotte E., ed. Some Historians of Modern Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Altman, S.P. (1940), “Schmoller's Political Economy.” The Journal of Political Economy. Volume XII, (12 1904–09 1905): 82–89.Google Scholar
Anikin, A. (1975), A Science in its Youth (Pre-Marxian Political Economy). Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Ascher, A. (1963), “Professors as Propagandists: The Politics of the Kathedersozialisten.” The Journal of Central European Affairs. Volume 23, No. 3 (10 1963): 282–302.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger (1985), A History of Modern Economic Analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Balabkins, Nicolas W. (1987), “Line by Line: Schmoller's Grundriss: Its Meaning for the 1980s.” International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 14, No. 1:22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer (1928), In Quest of Truth and Justice: Debunking the War Guilt Myth. Chicago: National Historical Society.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer and Becker, Howard, eds. (1961), Social Thought From Lore to Science. Reprint. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Barraclough, G. (1963), The Origins of Modern Germany. New York: Capricorn Books. First published in 1946.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark and Sturges, Paul, eds. (1983), Who's Who in Economics: A Biographical Dictionary of Major Economists 1700–1981. London: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect. Fourth Edition. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. (1986), Great Economists Before Keynes: An Introduction to the Lives and Works of One Hundred Great Economists of the Past. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press International, Inc.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. ed. (1986), Who's Who in Economics: A Biographical Dictionary of Major Economists 1700–1986. Second Edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boehm-Bawerk, E. (1890), “The Historical vs. The Deductive Method in Political Economy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 1, (07 1890–06 1891): 244–271. Translated by Henrietta Leonard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonn, M.J. (1938), Review of Gustave Schmoller und die Volkswirtschaftlehre by Carl, Brinkmann (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer. 1937) in Economic Journal. Vol. 68: 713–714.Google Scholar
Bottomore, T.B. (1971), Sociology: A Guide to Problems and Literature. New York: Pantheon Books, A division of Random House.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Martin (1985), “Early American Leaders – Institutional and Critical Traditions.” American Economic Review. Vol. 75, No. 6 (12): 13–38.Google Scholar
Buck, Philip W. (1971), The Politics of Mercantilism. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Bynum, W.F., Browne, E.J., and Porter, Roy, eds. (1981), Dictionary of The History of Science, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, John (1973), Great Europeans: Builders of Western Civilization. London: Century Boks Ltd.Google Scholar
Catlin, Warren B. (1962). The Progress of Economics: A History of Economic Thought. New York: Bookman Associates.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Hugh, ed., 11th edition (1911), The Encyclopaedia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information. New York: The Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
Clapham, J.H. (1963), The Economic Development of France and Germany, 1815–1914. Cambridge: The Syndics of Cambridge University Pres.Google Scholar
Coats, A.W. (1985). “The American Economic Association and the Economics Profession.” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 22, No. 4 (12): 1697–1727.Google Scholar
Coats, A.W.. (1987), “Review Essay: History of Political Economy The AEA and the History of Economics.” History of Economics Society Bulletin. Vol. IX, No. 1 (Fall): 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Kendall P. (1974), “Economics as a Moral Science.” Review of Social Economy. Vol. 32, No. 2 (10): 185–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. (1971), The New Leviathan or Man, Society, Civilization and Barbarism. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.Google Scholar
Cookingham, Mary E. (1987), “Social Economists and Reform: Berkeley, 1906–1961.” History of Political Economy. Vol. 19, No. 1 (Spring): 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossa, Luigi (1893), An Introduction to the Study of Political Economy. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Cosser, Lewis A. (1984), Refugee Scholars in America: Their Impact and Their Experiences. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene (1986), “The Emigration of the Austrian Economists.” History of Political Economy. Vol. 18, No. 1 (Spring): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Earleen and Leijohnufvud, Axel (1987), “Economics in America: The Continental Influence.” History of Political Economy. Vol. 19, No. 2 (Summer): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, William (1984), “Why Had Roscher So Little Influence in England?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 5 (07 1894–06 1895): 317–334.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., Markovits, Andrei S. and Platt, John, eds. (1986), Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980: What, Who, Where, How? Lanham Maryland: Abt Associates, Inc. University Press of America, Inc. A subtitle adds “Written Under the Auspices of the Wissenschaft-szentrum Berlin, June 1982.”Google Scholar
Diamond, Arthur M. Jr. (1988), “Citation Counts for Nobel Prize Winners in Economics,” History of Economics Society Bulletin. Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring): 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dopfer, Kurt (1985), “The Status of Reality in Economic Theory: The Methodenstreit Reconsidered.” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Allied Social Science Associations, New York, December 27–30.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph (1949), The Economic Mind in American Civilization. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. (1955), “The Role of the German Historical School in American Economic Thought.” American Economic Review. Vol. XLV, No. 2 (05): 17–28.Google Scholar
Dorpalen, Andreas (1985), German History in Marxist Perspective: The East German Approach. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1963), Translated by George Simpson. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. First published in 1893.Google Scholar
Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter, eds. (1987), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. New York: Stocton Press, a division of Grove's Dictionaries.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr., and Hebert, Robert F. (1983), A History of Economic Theory and Method. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. First edition 1975.Google Scholar
Farnam, Henry W. (1900), “Schmoller's Grundriss” Yale Review. Vol. 9, No. 2 (08): 164–174.Google Scholar
Fout, John C. (1974), German History and Civilization, 1806–1914; A Bibliography of Scholarly Periodical Literature. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. (1917), “Obituary: Gustave Schmoller” Economic Journal. Vol. 27, 435–438.Google Scholar
Ferguson, John M. (1950), Landmarks of Economic Thought. New York: Longman's Green and Company. First edition 1938.Google Scholar
Francois, Michel; Milne, A Taylor; Mommsen, Wolfgang J. and Shafer, Boyd C., eds. (1986), Historical Study in the West: France, Great Britain, Western Germany, The United States. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Freund, Julian (1986), The Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth (1987), Economics in Perspective: A Critical History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Gray, Alexander (1931), The Development of Economic Doctrine. London: Longmans, Green and Company.Google Scholar
Gide, Charles, and Rist, Charles (1948), A History of Economic Doctrines from the Time of the Physiocrats to the Present Day. Authorized translation by Richards, R., 2nd English ed., with additional matter from the latest French editions translated by Row, Ernest F.. London: George G. Harrap and Company Ltd. First published, 06, 1915.Google Scholar
Gottfried, Paul (1977), “Adam Smith and German Social Thought,” Modern Age. Vol. 21, No. 2 (Spring): 146–152.Google Scholar
Gruchy, Allan G. (1947), Modern Economic Thought: The American Contribution. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Haney, Lewis H. (1949), History of Economic Thought. New York: The Macmillan Company, First edition 1911.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1955), The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, London: The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.. (1973), Law Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. 3 volumes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Volume 2 The Mirage of Social Justice, p. 177 contains the disparaging reference to Schmoller and his ideas of justice.Google Scholar
Häuser, Karl (1988), “Historical School and ‘Methodenstreit’,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics: Zeitschrift fü die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. Vol. 144, No. 3: 532–542.Google Scholar
Heimann, Eduard (1945), History of Economic Doctrines, An Introduction to Economic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Irving Louis (1987), “Between the Charybdis of Capitalism and the Scylla of Communism: The Emigration of German Social Scientists, 1933–1945.” Social Science History. Vol. 11, No. 2 (Summer): 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Byrne J.; Ripley, Julien Jr., and Schnapper, M.B. (1948), Dictionary of Modern Economics. Washington D.C.: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, Bert F., ed. (1959), “Chapter 2, ‘History’;” in A Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Howey, Richard S. (1982), A Bibliography of General Histories of Economics, 1692–1975. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hudson, Michael (1975), Economics and Technology in 19th Century American Thought: The Neglected American Economists. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T.W. (1955), “Insularity and Cosmopolitanism in Economic Ideas, 1870–1914.” American Economic Review. Vol. XLV. No. 2 (05): 1–16.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. (1968), The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. I have not seen the Rev. ed., 1st Wesleyan pbk. ed. 1984, distributed by Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G.. (1975), New Directions in European Historiography. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press. With a contribution by Norman Baker.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. and Parker, Harold T., eds (1979), International Handbook of Historical Studies: Contemporary Research and Theory. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Iggers, George G. (1985), The Social History of Politics: Critical Perspectives in West German Historical Writing Since 1945. Leamington Spa; Dover, NH: Berg.Google Scholar
Jaffé, William (1955), “‘Discussion’ of Hutchison and Dorfman Papers.” American Economic Review. Vol. XLV. No. 2 (05): 37–39.Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad H., ed. (1983), The Transformation of Higher Learning, 1860–1930: Expansion, Diversification, Social Opening, and Professionalization in England, Germany, Russia, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad H.. (1985), “(Inter)national Styles of Quantitative History,” Historical Methods, A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. Vol. 18, No. 16 (Winter): 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eric A. (1988), “Counting ‘how It Really Was’: Quantitative History in West Germany.” Historical Methods, A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. Vol. 21, No. 2 (Spring): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W.T. (1943), “On the Meaning of the Term ‘Influence’ in Historical Studies.” Ethics, An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Vol. 53, No. 3 (04): 192–201.Google Scholar
Kadish, Alon (1982), The Oxford Economists in the Late Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard (1920), The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Nevill (1955), The Scope and Method of Political Economy. New York: Kelley and Millman, Inc. This is a reprint of the fourth edition. The first edition was published in 1891.Google Scholar
Kocka, Jürgen (1980), “Theory and Social History: Recent Developments in West Germany.” Social Research. Vol. 47, No. 3 (Autum): 426–457.Google Scholar
Koot, Gerard M. (1987), English Historical Economics, 1870–1926: The Rise of Economic History and Neomercantilism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krabbe, Jacob J. (1987), “Organistic Theory in Economics: The Contribution of the Historical School.” International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 14, No. 3,4,5: 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriedte, Peter, Medick, Hans and Schlumbohm, Jürgen (1981), Industrialization Before Industrialization: Rural Industry in the Genesis of Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First published in German as Industrialisierung vor der Industrialisierung, 1977.Google Scholar
Kuhn, W.E. (1963), The Evolution of Economic Thought. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Laidler, Harry W. (1927), A History of Socialist Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.Google Scholar
Landreth, Harry (1976), History of Economic Theory: Scope Method and Content. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Lee, C.H. (1977), The Quantitative Approach to Economic History. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Letiche, J.M. (1955), “‘Discussion’ of Hutchison and Dorfman Papers.” American Economic Review. Vol. XLV, No. 2 (05): 29–34.Google Scholar
Lorwin, Val R. and Price, Jacob J., eds. (1972), The Dimensions of the Past: Materials, Problems and Opportunities for Quantitative Work on History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mai, Ludwig H. (1975), Men and Ideas in Economics: A Dictionary of World Economists Past and Present. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred (1961), Principles of Economics. Ninth (variorum) Edition, with annotations by Guillebaud, C.W.. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited. Vol. I, Text. First Edition 1890.Google Scholar
Mathias, Peter ed. (1969), Revisions in Mercantilism. Bungay, Suffolk: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E. (1971), The German Historians and England: A Study in Nineteenth Century Views. Cambridge: At the University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles E.. (1973), “Berlin Historians and German Politics.” Journal of Contemporary History (Great Britain). Vol. 8, No. 3: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, Charles E.. (1980), State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700–1914. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1973), Edited and with an introduction by Storrer, Norman W.. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menger, Carl (1985), Investigations Into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. New York: New York University Press. Translation of Untersuchunger über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Polkitischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Translated by Nock, Francis J.. Edited by Louis, Schneider.Google Scholar
Merz, John Theodore (1914), A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century. Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons. In four volumes.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. (1949), Lecture Notes on Types of Economic Theory. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C.. (1969), Edited by Joseph, Dorfman, Volume II. Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism To Institutionalism. New York: Agustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Mongiovi, Gary (1988), “The American Methodenstreit.” History of Economics Society Bulletin. Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardinelli, Clark and Meiners, Roger E. (1988), “Schmoller the Methodenstreit, and the Development of Economic History.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft. Vol. 144, No. 3: 543–551.Google Scholar
Newman, Philip Charles (1952), The Development of Economic Thought. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
O'Brien, John C. (1987), “The Social Economics of Hugo Eisenhart Gustav von Schmoller.” International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 14, No. 11: 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palgrave, R.H. Inglis, (1896), Dictionary of Political Economy. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Pasley, Malcolm, ed. (1972), Germany: A Companion to German Studies. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1983), A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Riha, T. (1985), “German Political Economy: The History of an Alternative Economics.” International Journal of Social Economics. Vol. 12, Nos. 3,4,5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rima, Ingrid Hahne (1978), Development of Economic Analysis. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Third edition.Google Scholar
Rima, Ingrid Hahne. (1962), “Economists and the History of Ideas” in Rima, Ingrid H., ed. 1970. Readings in the History of Economic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Roll, Eric (1942), A History of Economic Thought. Second revised and enlarged edition. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav (1894), “The Idea of Justice in Political Economy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 4, (03): 697–737. Translated by von Halle, Ernst L. and Schutz, Carl L..Google Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav (1902), The Mercantile System and Its Historical Significance: Illustrated Chiefly from Prussian History. New York: The Macmillan Company. One in the series “Economic Classics” edited by Ashley, W.J.. On the title page, in addition to the above is “BEING A CHAPTER FROM THE STUDIEN UEBER DIE WIRTHSCHAFTLICHE POLITIK FRIEDRICHS DES GROSSEN by GUSTAV SCHMOLLER, 1884.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.. (1950), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Schumpter, Joseph A., Elizabeth Boody, Schumpeter, ed. (1954), History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Bernadotte, ed. (1942), Some Historians of Modern Europe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, William A. (1933), The Development of Economics. New York and London: The Century Co.Google Scholar
Seager, H.R. (1893), “Economics at Berlin and Vienna.” The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 1, (12 1902-09 1903): 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, Edwin R.A., ed. (1935), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press.Google Scholar
Silberner, Edmund (1946), Translated by Krappe, A.H.. The Problem of War in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sills, David L., ed. (1968), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: The Macmillan Company and The Free Press.Google Scholar
Small, Albion W. (1924), “Some Contributions to the History of Sociology: Section XVI. The Schmoller-Treitschke Controversy, Illustrating the Psychology of Transition.” The American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 30 (07): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M. (1988), “The Wide, Wide World of Wealth,” The New York Times Book Review. 03 20, 1988. 3 ff. A review of The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitirim (1928), Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Spann, Othmar (1930), Types of Economic Theory. London: George Allen and Unwin. Ltd.Google Scholar
Spengler, Joseph J. and Allen, William R., eds. (1960), Essays in Economic Thought: Aristotle to Marshall. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
Stigler, George, “Economic Thought Over 1,500 Years.” The Wall Street Journal. 10 2, 1987, p. 11.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. (1965), “The Influence of Events and Policies on Economic Theory (1960).” In Essays in the History of Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Henry William (1983), The Growth of Economic Thought, Revised and Expanded Edition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Streissler, Eric and Milford, Karl (1988), “Theoretical and Methodological Positions of German Economics in the Middle of the Nineteenth Century.” Paper presented to the Symposium “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today,” Heilbronn Germany, 06 24–27.Google Scholar
Taussig, F.W. (1905), “Schmoller on Protection and Free Trade.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 3 (05): 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A.J.P. (1946), The Course of German History, A Survey of the Development of Germany Since 1915. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Thayer, William Roscoe (1899), Throne Makers. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand (1974), Edited, Translated, and Annotated by Jacoby, E.G.. On Social Ideas and Ideologies. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Unwin, George (1927), Edited with an Introductory Memoir by Tawney, R.H.. Studies in Economic History: The Collected Papers of George Unwin. Published for the Royal Economic Society. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein (1915), Imperial Germany and The Industrial Revolution. New York: The Macmillan Company. I worked from the Viking Press edition of 1936.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. (1919), The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays. New York: B.W. Huebsch. New edition 1930.Google Scholar
Wagner, Donald O., ed. (1936), Social Reformers: Adam Smith to John Dewey. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1958), Translated by Talcott Parsons. The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. (1961), General Economic History. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Sidney, ed. (1977), Modern Economic Thought. University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Andrew Dickson (1910), Seven Great Statesmen in the Warfare of Humanity with Unreason. New York: The Century Company.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Edmund (1960), Schools and Streams of Economic Thought. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.Google Scholar
Wiener, Philip P., ed. (1974), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Wildenmann, R. (1982), “Milieus for Advances in Political Science” in Deutsch, Karl W.; Markovits, Andrel S. and Platt, John, eds. (1986). Advances in the Social Sciences, 1900–1980: What, Who, Where, How? Lanham, MD: Abt Associates, Inc. University Press of America, Inc.Google Scholar
Wright, Esmond (1973), “Otto Von Bismarck.” In Canning, John, ed. 1973. Great Europeans: Builders of Western Civilization. London: Centry Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Williamson, John G. (1971), Karl Helfferich 1872–1924: Economist, Financier, Politician. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zweig, Ferdinand (1950), Economic Ideas: A Study of Historical Perspectives. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar