We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Viktor J. Vanberg, ed., The Sensory Order and Other Writings on the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology by F. A. Hayek (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017), pp. 432, $70 (hardcover). ISBN: 9780226436425.
Review products
Viktor J. Vanberg, ed., The Sensory Order and Other Writings on the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology by F. A. Hayek (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017), pp. 432, $70 (hardcover). ISBN: 9780226436425.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
07 February 2019
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Boettke, Peter. 2015. “The Methodology of Austrian Economics as a Sophisticated, Rather than Naïve, Philosophy of Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought37 (1): 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, Edwin G.1942. Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey. 2013. “Hayek’s Two Epistemologies and the Paradoxes of His Thought.” Critical Review25 (3–4): 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1969] 2014. “The Primacy of the Abstract.” In The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. Volume 15: The Market and Other Orders, edited by Caldwell, B. J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 314–317.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 2006. Die Sensorische Ordnung: Eine Untersuchung der Grudlagen der Theoretischen Psychologie. Translated by Streit, Manfred. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians, and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scheall, Scott. 2015a. “Hayek the Apriorist?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought37 (1): 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheall, Scott. 2016. “A Brief Note Concerning Hayek’s Non-Standard Conception of Knowledge.” The Review of Austrian Economics29 (2): 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheall, Scott. 2017. “What Is Extreme about Mises’s Extreme Apriorism?” Journal of Economic Methodology24 (3): 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weimer, Walter. 1982. “Hayek’s Approach to the Problems of Complex Phenomena: An Introduction to the Theoretical Psychology of The Sensory Order.” In Weimer, W. B. and Palermo, D. A., eds., Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 241–285.Google Scholar
Zanotti, Gabriel, and Cachanosky, Nicolas. 2015. “Implications of Machlup’s Interpretation of Mises’s Epistemology.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought37: 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar