Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:40:05.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE USDA GRADUATE SCHOOL: GOVERNMENT TRAINING IN STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 1921–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2011

MALCOLM RUTHERFORD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The USDA Graduate School was founded in 1921 to provide statistical and economic training to the employees of the Department of Agriculture. The school did not grant degrees, but its graduate courses were accepted for credit by a significant number of universities.

In subsequent years, the activities of the school grew rapidly to provide training in many different subject areas for employees from almost all federal departments. The training in statistics provided by the school was often highly advanced (instructors included Howard Tolley and, later, Edwards Deming), while the economics taught displayed an eclectic mix of standard and institutional economics. Mordecai Ezekiel taught both economics and statistics at the school, and had himself received his statistical training there. Statistics instruction in 1936 and 1937 included seminar series from R.A. Fisher and J. Neyman, and courses on the probability approach to sampling involving Lester Frankel and William Hurwitz became important after 1939. The instruction in economics was noticeably institutionalist in the period of the New Deal. Towards the end of the period considered here, the instruction in economics became narrower and more focused on agricultural economics.

The activities of the school provide a basis for understanding some of the sources of the relative statistical sophistication of agricultural economists and of the statistical work done in government in the interwar period. It is noteworthy than within the USDA Graduate School, and in contrast to the Cowles Commission, statistical sophistication coexisted with an approach to economics that was not predominantly neoclassical. It also provides a light on the place of institutional economics in the training of government economists through the same time span.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 419 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. 2000. “Fisher’s ‘Inverse Probability’ of 1930.” International Statistical Review 68 (2): 155–172.Google Scholar
Aldrich, J. 2010. “The Econometricians’ Statisticians, 1895–1945.” History of Political Economy 42 (Spring): 111–154.Google Scholar
Banzhaf, Spencer H. 2006. “The Other Economics Department: Demand and Value Theory in Early Agricultural Economics.” In Mirowski, Philip and Wade Hands, D., eds., Agreement on Demand: Consumer Theory in the Twentieth Century. Annual Supplement to Volume 38, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
Bean, Louis H. 1929. “A Simplified Method of Graphic Curvilinear Correlation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 24 (December): 386–397.Google Scholar
Berman, Edward. 1930. Labor and the Sherman Act. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Brewster, David E. 1985. “USDA’s Graduate School—The Growth of an Educational Institution.” USDA Graduate School, Folder: Graduate School History 1964.Google Scholar
Burns, A. R. 1936. The Decline of Competition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
David, Herbert A. 1998. “Statistics in US Universities in 1933 and the Establishment of the Statistical Laboratory at Iowa State.” Statistical Science 13 (1): 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Harold T. 1941. The Theory of Econometrics. Bloomington IN: Principia Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Joseph W., and Shelton, William C.. 1978. Revolution in United States Government Statistics, 1926–1976. Washington DC: Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Duncan, Joseph W., and Shelton, William C.. 1992. “U.S. Government Contributions to Probability Sampling and Statistical Analysis.” Statistical Science 7 (3): 320–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Richard N. 1940. “Schools and Training Courses in Government Departments.” Senate Document 182, 76th Congress, 3rd Session.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1924. “A Method of Handling Curvilinear Correlation for any Number of Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 19 (December): 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1930. Methods of Correlation Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1936. $2,500 A Year: From Scarcity to Abundance. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1937. “An Annual Estimate of Savings by Individuals.” Review of Economic Statistics 19 (November): 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1938. “The Cobweb Theorem.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 52 (February): 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1939. Jobs for All. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1957. “Reminiscences of Mordecai Ezekiel.” Oral History Collection of Columbia University.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1928. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Second edition. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1936. Statistical Inference and the Testing of Hypotheses. USDA Graduate School: Washington DC.Google Scholar
Fox, Karl A. 1986. “Agricultural Economists as World Leaders in Applied Econometrics, 1917–1933.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (May): 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Karl A. 1987. “Agricultural Economics.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
Fox, Karl A. 1989. “Agricultural Economists in the Econometric Revolution: Institutional Background, Literature and Leading Figures.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 41 (Jan): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Martin, and King, Benjamin. 1996. “A Conversation with Leslie Kish.” Statistical Science 11 (Feb): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Lester R., and Stevens Stock, J.. 1942. “On the Sample Survey of Unemployment.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 37 (March): 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1937. “The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 32 (December): 675–701.Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O., and Supple, Barry, eds. 1990. The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H. and Associates. 1938. Price and Price Policies. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., and Madow, W. G.. 1953. Sample Survey Methods and Theory. Volumes I and II. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. 1966. The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. 1990. “Economic Inquiry and the State in New Era America: Antistatist Corporatism and Positive Statism in Uneasy Coexistence.” In Furner, Mary O. and Supple, Barry, eds., The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–324.Google Scholar
Jewett, Andrew. 2011. “Philosophy, Deliberative Democracy, and the Cultural Turn in the 1930s USDA. In Allen, Danielle S. and Reich, Rob, eds., Education, Democracy, and Justice. Chicago: Chicago University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Paul. 1940. “The Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture.” The Journal of Higher Education 11 (June): 287–292.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, Richard S. 1966. Social Scientists and Farm Politics in the Age of Roosevelt. Columbia MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling. 1947. “Measurement Without Theory.” Review of Economic Statistics 29 (August): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, Michael James, and Furner, Mary O., eds. 1993. The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frederic S. 1990. “From Multi-Industry Planning to Keynesian Planning: Gardiner Means, the American Keynesians, and National Economic Planning at the National Resources Committee.” Journal of Policy History 2 (2): 186–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., and Rutherford, Malcolm, eds. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. 1934. “On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97 (4): 558–625.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. 1938a. Lectures and Conferences on Mathematical Statistics. USDA Graduate School: Washington DC.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. 1938b. “Contribution to the Theory of Sampling Human Populations.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 33 (March): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrbaugh, Lewis H. 1947. “Graduate School of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.” Higher Education 3 (March 1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2003. “On the Economic Frontier: Walton Hamilton, Institutional Economics and Education.” History of Political Economy 35 (Winter): 611–653.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2004. “Institutional Economics at Columbia University.” History of Political Economy 36 (Spring): 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2006. “Wisconsin Institutionalism: John R. Commons and his Students.” Labor History 47 (May): 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm, and Tyler DesRoches, C.. 2008. “The Institutionalist Reaction to Keynesian Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (March): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewhart, Walter A. 1939. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Washington DC: USDA Graduate School.Google Scholar
Stapleford, Thomas. 2007. “Market Visions: Expenditure Surveys and Economic Planning in the New Deal.” Journal of American History 94 (September): 418–444.Google Scholar
Taylor, Henry C. 1905. Agricultural Economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Henry C., and Dewees Taylor, Anne. 1952. The Story of Agricultural Economics in the United States, 1840–1932. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.Google Scholar
Teira, David. 2007. “Milton Friedman, the Statistical Methodologist.” History of Political Economy 39 (Fall): 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Howard R., and Ezekiel, Mordecai. 1923. “A Method of Handling Multiple Correlation Problems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 18 (December): 993–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA Graduate School. 1930. “Special Lectures on Economics.” USDA Graduate School Records, 1921–1976, Collection 181, National Agricultural Library, Box 7.Google Scholar
USDA Graduate School. 1964. “History of the Graduate School.” USDA Graduate School Records, 1921–1976, Collection 181, National Agricultural Library, Box 18.Google Scholar
USDA Graduate School Records, 1921–1976, Collection 181, National Agricultural Library, 20 Boxes.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. V. 1938. “Market Prorates and Social Welfare.” Journal of Farm Economics 20: 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, F. V. 1942. “Regressions Between Sets of Variables.” Econometrica 18: 290–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wermel, M. T. 1939. The Evolution of the Classical Wage Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Woods, A. F. 1938. “The Graduate School of the United States Department of Agriculture.” School and Society 47 (January 29): 150–155.Google Scholar
Working, E. J. 1927. “What Do Statistical ‘Demand Curves’ Show?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 41 (February): 212–235.Google Scholar
Yohe, William P. 1982. “The Mysterious Career of Walter W. Stewart, Especially 1922–1930.” History of Political Economy 14 (Winter): 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G. Udny. 1911. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. London: Griffin.Google Scholar