Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T07:59:18.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Classics: Böhm-Bawerk's Positive Theory and Fisher's Rate of Interest Through Modern Prisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Paul A. Samuelson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Positive Theory of Capital (1889) is a classic which contains Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's 1889 correct vision of how the interest rate might be determined by the interplay of systematic time preference (“impatience”) and time-phased technology's productivity. But he was not quite able to formulate his intuitive vision in terms that would satisfy today's persnickety jury of theorists. And indeed the classic Rate of Interest (1907) by his younger contemporary, Irving Fisher, seemed to be disagreeing with Böhm-Bawerk's treatment of time's net productivity; but, as Fisher was unable to make clear until 1930, he was objecting only to Böhm-Bawerk's formulation of the role of productivity in interest determination. In point of fact, Fisher, who was so long identified (wrongly, but understandably) as an “impatience theorist,” considered his own main contribution to interest theory to be his clarification of how the technological superiority of time-consuming processes cooperated in the determination of the equilibrium interest rate.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , Fall 1994 , pp. 202 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1884, 1889, 1921. Kapital und Kapitalzins, I: Geschichte und Kritik der Kapitalzins-Theorien, II: Positive Theories des Kapitales, III: Exkurse zur “Positiven Theorie des Kapitales,” Wagner, Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1959. Capital and Interest, I: History and Critique of Interest Theories. II: Positive Theory of Capital. III: Further Essays on Capital and Interest, translated by Huncke, George D. and Sennholz, Hans F., Libertarian Press, South Holland, IL.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1896. “Zum Abschluss des Marxschen Systems,” Staats-wissenschaftliche Arbeiten, Festgaben für Karl Knies, 85–205, Haering, Berlin; translated into English as Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Karl Marx and the Close of His System, and as Rudolf Hilferding, Böhm-Bawerk's Criticism of Marx; edited by Paul Sweezy, Merlin Press, London, 1949.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus von. 1907. “Zur Berichtigung der Grundlegenden Theoretischen Konstruktion von Marx im Dritten Band des ‘Kapital,’” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie, 24; translated into English as “Value and Price in the Marxian System,” International Economic Papers, 2, 1952, 5–61.Google Scholar
Clark, John Bates. 1899. The Distribution of Wealth, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Dmitriev, Vladimir. 1898. Ekonomicheskie Ocherki; translated by Fry, D. in Nuti, D. M., ed., Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1974.Google Scholar
Dobb, Maurice. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1907. The Rate of Interest, Its Nature, Determination and Relation to Economic Phenomena, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1911. Elementary Principles of Economics, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving. 1930. The Theory of Interest, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1960. Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione, Giuffrè, Milan.Google Scholar
Hawkins, David and Herbert, Simon. 1949. “Note: Some Conditions of Macroeconomic Stability,” Econometrica, 17, July-October, 145–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1931. Prices and Production, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. 1936. “The Mythology of Capital,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 50, no. 2, February, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W. Stanley. 1871, 1879. The Theory of Political Economy, Macmillan, London and New York.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1956. “Alternative Theories of Distribution,” Review of Economic Studies 23, no. 2, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1935. “Professor Hayek and the Theory of Investment,” Economic Journal, 45, no. 1, 03, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1960. “Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience,” Econometrica, 28, 04, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1941. The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1890. Principles of Economics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J.S. and Ian, Steedman. 1972. “Reswitching and Primary Input Use,” Economic Journal, 82, no. 35, 03, 140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, John von. 1945–1946. “A Model of General Economic Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, 13, no. 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, Luigi. 1962. “Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, 29, 10, 267–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, John. 1834. Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy, Exposing the Fallacies of the System of Free Trade, and of Some Other Doctrines Maintained in the ‘Wealth of Nations,’ Hilliard Gray & Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Frank P. 1928. “A Mathematical Theory of Saving,” Economic Journal, 38, 12, 543–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1956. The Accumulation of Capital, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1966. “A Summing Up,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, no. 4, 11, 568–583; reproduced as Chapter 148 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1979. “Land and the Rate of Interest,” Theory for Economic Efficiency: Essays in Honor of Abba P. Lerner, edited by Greenfield, B. I., Levenson, A. M., Hamovitch, W., Rotwein, E., MIT Press, Cambridge; reproduced as Chapter 344 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 5, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1983. “Thünen at Two Hundred,” Journal of Economic Literature, 21, December, 1468–88; reproduced as Chapter 339 in The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, 5, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schefold, Bertram. 1971. Theorie der kuppelproduktion, privately printed, Bâle.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1912. The Theory of Economic Development, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig; translated into English, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1934.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thünen, Johann H. von. 1863. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirthschaft und Nationalökonomie, Leopold, Rostock.Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne Robert Jacques. 1766. Réflexiones sur la formation et la distribution des richesses; translated into English, A. M. Kelley, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
Uzawa, Hirofumi. 1961, 1963. “On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth, I–II,” Review of Economic Studies, 29, 10 1961, 40–47; 30, 06 1963, 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksell, J. G. Knut. 1893. Über Wert, Kapital, und Rente, Fischer, G., Jena; translated into English by Frowein, S. H. as Value Capital and Rent, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1954.Google Scholar
Wicksell, J. G. Knut. 1911. “Böhm-Bawerks kapitalteori och kritiken därav,” Ekonomisk Tidskrift; translated into English as “Böhm-Bawerk's Theory of Capital” in Erik, Lindahl, ed., Knut Wicksell's Selected Papers on Economic Theory, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar