Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:45:06.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing Social Democracy's Inner Limits: From Collectivism to the Politics of Dissonance in Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Joel Krieger
Joel Krieger
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science; Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481–8203.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a world where transitions to democracy are often turbulent, interrupted, and uncertain, it is easy to think of Britain, where an embryonic form of parliamentary democracy emerged in the seventeenth century as an exception because the basic shape of politics has appeared settled for so long. On the contrary, I will argue, since the 1970s Britain has been fundamentally transformed from a consensus-driven, institutionally cohesive, model West European democracy, into a fractious, institutionally rigid, and quite unresponsive political system. I will suggest that these developments in Britain have broader comparative significance for they help identify a critical shift from social democracy or collectivism to what I call a post-collectivist politics of dissonance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 335 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1980 The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. 1965. British Politics in the Collectivism Age. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. 1982. Britain Against Itself: The Political Contradictions of Collectivism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Butler, David and Kavanagh, Dennis. 1997. The British General Election of 1997. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1992. “Labor Force Changes, Working Class Decline; and the Labour Vote: Social and Electoral Trends in Postwar Britain.” In Piven, Frances Fox, ed., Labor Parties in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard. 1991. “The English and the British.” In Crick, Bernard, ed., National Identities: The Constitution of the United Kingdom. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick. 1997. “Introduction: ‘New Times’ in British Politics.” In Dunleavy, Patrick, Gamble, Andrew, Holliday, Ian, and Peele, Gillian, eds., Developments in British Politics 5. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick and Husbands, Christopher. 1985. British Democracy at the Crossroads. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. 1991. ‘There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack’: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H., ed. 1984. Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism: Studies in the Political Economy of Western European Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goulbourne, Harry. 1991. Ethnicity and Nationalism in Post-Imperial Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Wyn. 1989. “The Erosion of Intermediary Institutions.” The Political Quarterly 60 (01): 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1992. “The Question of Cultural Identity.” In Hall, Stuart, Held, David, and McGrew, Tony, eds., Modernity and Its Futures. Cambridge: Polity Press in Association with the Open University.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1990. The Condition of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick 1988. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter and Penrose, Jan, eds. 1994. Constructions of Race, Place and Nation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jowell, R. S. Witherspoon and Brooks, L., eds. 1988. British Social Attitudes: the 6th Report. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Judge, David. 1990. “Parliament and Interest Representation.” In Rush, Michael, ed., Parliament and Pressure Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Dennis. 1990. British Politics: Continuities and Change, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kearney, Hugh. 1991. “Four Nations or One?” In Crick, Bernard, ed., National Identities: The Constitution of the United Kingdom. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Kesselman, Mark. 1997. “France.” In Kesselman, Mark and Krieger, Joel, eds., European Politics in Tradition, 3rd edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sid and Bayliss, Fred. 1995. Contemporary British Industrial Relations, 2nd edition. Hound-mills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Joel. 1992. “Class, Consumption, and Collectivism: Perspectives on the Labour Party and Electoral Competition in Britain.” In Piven, Frances Fox, ed., Labor Parties in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, Joel. 1999. British Politics in the Global Age: Can Social Democracy Survive? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1993. The Postmodern Explained. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McIlroy, John. 1988. Trade Unions in Britain Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Robert. 1987. “Recent Marxist Theories of Nationalism and the Issue of Racism.” The British Journal of Sociology 38 (1): 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 1990. What's Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Anatomy of a Labour Landslide.” Parliamentary Affairs 50 (4): 509–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Evans, Geoffrey. 1999. “Conclusion: Was 1997 a Critical Election?” In Evens, Geoffrey and Norris, Pippa, eds., Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective. London, Sage.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu/The Runnymede Trust. 2000: The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1992. “History and Sovereignty: The Historiographical Response to Europeanization in Two British Cultures.” Journal of British Studies 31 (10): 358–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas. 1992. The Limits of Social Democracy: Investment Politics in Sweden. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Jorgen S. 1993. The British Political Process. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ross, George. 1997. “The European Union.” In Kesselman, Mark and Krieger, Joel, eds., European Politics in Tradition, 3rd edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Milin.Google Scholar
Rush, Michael. 1990. Parliament and Pressure Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1993. “Why the Conservative Party Won—Again.” In King, Anthony, ed., Britain at the Polls 1992. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1998. “The New Electoral Battlefield.” In King, Anthony, ed., New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Särlvik, Bo and Crewe, Ivor. 1983. Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Peter. 1986. Social Theory and the Urban Question, 2nd edition. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” Review of Politics 36 (1): 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, Alan. 1989. Literature, Politics, and Culture in Postwar Britain. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, Margaret. F. 1992. “Narrativity, Narrative Identity, and Social Action: Rethinking English Working-Class Formation.” Social Science History 16 (Winter): 591–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1988. “On the Theory and Practice of Power.” In Arac, Jonathan, ed., After Foucault: Humanistic Knowledge, Postmodern Challenges. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar