Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:50:31.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS FROM THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT TO CONTEMPORARY EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Ai-Thu Dang
Ai-Thu Dang*
Affiliation:
University of Paris 1, Centre d’économie de la Sorbonne (CNRS), 106-112, Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 74647 Paris Cedex 13, France. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold: first, we show that some theoretical continuities exist between the approaches of Bernard Mandeville, Adam Ferguson, and Adam Smith to the division of labor and the contemporary analyses of technical change and economic dynamics, which consider innovation as a process of technological creation. We thus offer a further exploration of the origins of evolutionary ideas in the history of evolutionary economics. Second, despite the existence of these theoretical continuities, we highlight the differences between the Scottish Enlightenment authors and the modern evolutionary economists on the issue of temporality and the place of history in their reflections.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 211 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, Brian W. 1988. “Competing Technologies: An Overview.” In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 590–607.Google Scholar
Arthur, Brian W. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal 99 (March): 116–131.Google Scholar
Brette, Olivier. 2006. “Expanding the Dialogue between Institutional Economics and Contemporary Evolutionary Economics: Veblen’s Methodology as a Framework.” Journal of Economic Issues 40 (2): 493–500.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Yoon, Yong J.. 2000. “A Smithean Perspective on Increasing Returns.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (1): 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Norman, and Juma, Calestous. 1988. “Evolutionary Theories in Economic Thought.” In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L., eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 197–218.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of Qwerty.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1993. “Path Dependence and Predictability in Dynamics Systems with Local Network Externalities: A Paradigm for Historical Economics.” In Foray, D. and Freeman, C., eds., Technology and the Wealth of Nations. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 208–231.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 2001. “Path Dependence, its Critics and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics’.” In Garrouste, P. and Ioannides, S., eds., Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
David, Paul A., and Foray, Dominique. 1995. “Dépendance du sentier et économie de l’innovation: un rapide tour d’horizon.” Hors série: “Economie industrielle: développements récents.” Revue d’Economie Industrielle: 27–52.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.” Research Policy 11: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1988a. “The Nature of the Innovative Process.” In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silveberg, G., and Soete, L., eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 221–238.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1988b. “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature XXVI: 1120–1171.Google Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1991. “Perspectives on Evolutionary Theory.” Science and Public Policy 18 (December): 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni, and Nelson, Richard R.. 1994. “An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 4 (3): 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1973. De la division du travail social. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. [1767] 1991. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Freeman, Christopher, and Perez, Carlota. 1988. “Structural Crises of Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour.” In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silveberg, G., and Soete, L., eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York: Pinter Publishers, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar
Granger, Gilles Gaston. 1955. Méthodologie Economique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. [1964] 1987. “La technologie, science humaine.” Reprint in Haudricourt, A-G., La technologie, science humaine, recherches d’histoire et d’ethnologie des techniques. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 37–46.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1993. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1999. Evolution and Institutions: On Evolutionary Economics and the Evolution of Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2011. “Evolutionary Economics.” Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) . Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1979. “Historical Dimension of The Wealth of Nations.” In O’Driscoll, G. P., ed., Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy. Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
Jack, Malcolm. 1989. Corruption & Progress: The Eighteenth-century Debate. AMS Studies in the Eighteenth Century, no. 11. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. [1723] 1988. “A Search into the Nature of Society.” In The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Volume I. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, pp. 323–369.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. [1714–1729] 1988. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Two volumes. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Marciano, Alain, and Pelissier, Maud. 2000. “The Influence of Scottish Enlightenment on Darwin’s Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 239–249.Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen. 1974. “What Do Bosses Do? The Origin and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production.” Review of Radical Political Economics 6 (2): 60–112.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1867] 1948. Le Capital. Livre I. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1905–1910] 1974. Théories sur la plus-value. Volume I. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard, and Winter, Sydney. 1977. “In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation.” Research Policy 6: 36–76.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard, and Winter, Sydney. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perez, Carlotta. 1983. “Structural Change and Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social Systems.” Futures 15 (5): 357–375.Google Scholar
Sahal, Devendra. 1985. “Technological Guideposts and Innovation Avenues.” Research Policy 14: 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1954] 1968. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1965. “Economics and History. The Scottish Enlightenment.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 12 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Skinner, Andrew S. 1975. “Adam Smith: An Economic Interpretation of History.” In Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, Th., eds., Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford, pp. 154–178.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Two volumes. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
Usher, Abbott P. [1929] 1954. A History of Mechanical Inventions. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Sydney. 1987. “Natural Selection and Evolution.” In Durlaf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Volume 3. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 614–617.Google Scholar
Witt, Ulrich. 2008. “Evolutionary Economics.” In Durlaf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Volume 3. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–73.Google Scholar