Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:42:38.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOME INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF BUSINESS CYCLES: NEISSER, HABERLER, AND MODERN OPEN ECONOMY MACROECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

Hans-Michael Trautwein
Hans-Michael Trautwein*
Affiliation:
ZenTra—Center for Transnational Studies, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg (Germany). [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the transnational character of the Great Depression, there are few works in the interwar literature that deal with the propagation of business cycles across national borders and systemic risks of depression in the world economy. Two notable exceptions are Hans Neisser’s Some International Aspects of the Business Cycle (1936) and chapter 12 in Gottfried Haberler’s Prosperity and Depression ([1937] 1964), which carries the heading “International Aspects of Business Cycles.” Both works differ substantially from each other and from the modern way of thinking about international business cycles in open economy macroeconomics. Haberler’s and Neisser’s approaches help to identify relevant issues that have been lost from sight in modern open economy macroeconomics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 39 , Special Issue 1: Special Issue: Business Cycles and Economic Growth , March 2017 , pp. 47 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boianovsky, Mauro, and Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2006. “Haberler, the League of Nations, and the Quest for Consensus in Business Cycle Theory in the 1930s.” History of Political Economy 38 (1): 45–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandolfo, Giancarlo. 2002. International Finance and Open-Economy Macroeconomics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1936. The Theory of International Trade, with Its Applications to Commercial Policy. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. [1937] 1964. Prosperity and Depression. A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Fifth edition. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 1994. “Hayek and the Kiel School: Some Reflections on the German Debate on Business Cycles in the Late 1920s and Early 1930s.” In Colonna, Marina and Hagemann, Harald, eds., Money and Business Cycles. The Economics of F.A. Hayek. Volume I. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1931. Prices and Production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2000. “How Complicated Does the Model Have to Be?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16 (4): 33–42.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1928. Der Tauschwert des Geldes. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1931. “Der Kreislauf des Geldes.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 33: 365–408.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1932. “Lohnhöhe und Beschäftigungsgrad im Marktgleichgewicht.” Welt-wirtschaftliches Archiv 36 (2): 414–455. Translated 1990 as “The Wage Rate and Employment in Market Equilibrium.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 1 (1): 141–163.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1934a. “General Overproduction. A Study of Say’s Law of Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 42 (4): 433–465.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1934b. “Monetary Expansion and the Structure of Production.” Social Research 1 (4): 434–457.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1936. Some International Aspects of the Business Cycle. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Hans. 1942. “‘Permanent’ Technological Unemployment. ‘Demand for Commodities Is Not Demand for Labour.’” American Economic Review 32 (1): 50–71.Google Scholar
Neisser, Hans, and Modigliani, Franco. 1953. National Incomes and International Trade—A Quantitative Analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, Maurice, and Rogoff, Kenneth. 1996. Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tichy, Gunther. 1990. “Haberlers Konjunkturtheorie des gesunden Menschenverstandes.” Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 37 (4): 377–383.Google Scholar
Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2003. “Neisser’s Unorthodox Quantity Theory of Money.” In Nell, Edward and Forstater, Matthew, eds., Reinventing Functional Finance. Transformational Growth and Full Employment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 66–82.Google Scholar
Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2010. “Hans Neisser’s Views on Money and Structural Change, and Modern ‘Quantity Theory’ Implications.” In Leeson, Robert, ed., David Laidler’s Contributions to Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 285–302.Google Scholar
Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2014. “Three Macroeconomic Syntheses of Vintage 1937: Hicks, Haberler, and Lundberg.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (5): 839–870.Google Scholar
Uribe, Martín, and Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie. 2015. Open Economy Macroeconomics. Here quoted after online version of September 3, 2015. www.columbia.edu/∼mu2166/book/usg.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2016. Forthcoming from Princeton University Press.Google Scholar