No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Roger Frantz and Robert Leeson, eds., Hayek and Behavioral Economics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) pp. xvii, 349, $115. ISBN 978-0-230-30116-0.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2015
References
REFERENCES
Angner, Erik. 2004. “Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought
26 (3): 349–361.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Bruce, and Reiss, Julian. 2006. “Hayek, Logic, and Cultural Evolution.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought
28 (3): 359–370.Google Scholar
Denis, Andy. 2002. “Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman.” Constitutional Political Economy
13 (3): 275–285.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1955] 1967. “Degrees of Explanation.” In Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. New York: Simon and Schuster, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menger, Karl. 1994. Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium. Edited by Golland, L., McGuinness, B., and Sklar, A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 2004. “Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics.” History of Political Economy
36 (4): 735–760.Google Scholar
Whitman, Douglas Glen. 1998. “Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems.” Constitutional Political Economy
9 (1): 45–66.Google Scholar
Whitman, Douglas Glen. 2003. “Hayek contra Pangloss: A Rejoinder.” Constitutional Political Economy
14 (4): 335–338.Google Scholar