Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:43:33.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roger Backhouse on the Study of Dissent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Warren J. Samuels
Warren J. Samuels
Affiliation:
8476 SW 10th Road, Gainesville, FL 32607.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Roger Backhouse (Backhouse 2004) has provided both an insightful deconstruction of dissent and a suggested terminology to deal with subtle distinctions within the domain of dissent, especially regarding the status of heterodoxy. There is more to be said, largely in expansion of his analyses—placing his analyses in a larger context. Section I summarizes Backhouse's position and Section II presents my own thoughts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 119 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Backhouse, R. E. 2004. A Suggestion for Clarifying the Study of Dissent in Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26 (06), pp. 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar