Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:28:41.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard van den Berg, ed., Richard Cantillon’s Essay on the Nature of Trade in General: A Variorum Edition, by Richard Cantillon (London and New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 514, $200. ISBN 978-1-13801-458-9.

Review products

Richard van den Berg, ed., Richard Cantillon’s Essay on the Nature of Trade in General: A Variorum Edition, by Richard Cantillon (London and New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 514, $200. ISBN 978-1-13801-458-9.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2016

John Berdell
John Berdell*
Affiliation:
DePaul University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 543 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Murphy, Antoin E. 1986. Richard Cantillon: Entrepreneur and Economist. Oxford, New York, Toronto, and Melbourne: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Antoin E. 2009. The Genesis of Macroeconomics: New Ideas from Sir William Petty to Henry Thornton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Richard. 2012. “‘Something Wonderful and Incomprehensible in Their Œconomy’: The English Versions of Richard Cantillon’s Essay on the Nature of Trade in General.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 19 (6): 868–907.Google Scholar