Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:31:54.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REJOINDER TO ROSS: MORE ON THE ROBBINS–SAMUELSON ARGUMENT PATTERN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

D. WADE HANDS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 105 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernheim, Douglas and Rangel, Antonio. 2008. “Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–92.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1989. “True Believers.” In The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 13–35.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. “Real Patterns.” The Journal of Philosophy 88: 27–51.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 1994. “Restabilizing Dynamics.” Economics and Philosophy 10: 243–83.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2006. “Integrability, Rationalizability, and Path-Dependency in the History of Demand Theory.” In Mirowski, P. and Hands, D. W., eds., Agreement on Demand: Consumer Theory in the Twentieth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press [Annual Supplement to Volume 38 of History of Political Economy], pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2007. “Effective Tension in Robbins's Economic Methodology.” Economica [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2008. “Introspection, Revealed Preference and Neoclassical Economics: A Critical Response to Don Ross on the Robbins–Samuelson Argument Pattern.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (4): 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. 2008. “Mindless or Mindful Economics: A Methodological Evaluation.” In Caplin, A. and Schotter, A., eds., The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. and Allen, R. G. D.. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value, Parts I and II.” Economica 2: 52–76, 196–219.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James and Ross, Don (with Spurrett, David and Collier, John). 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. “How to Do Things with Metaphors: Paul Samuelson and the Science of Neoclassical Economics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Hands, D. Wade. 1998. "A Paradox of Budgets: The Postwar Stabilization of American Neoclassical Demand Theory.” In Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., eds., From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press [Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy], pp. 269–92.Google Scholar
Moscati, Ivan. 2007. “Early Experiments in Consumer Demand Theory: 1930–1970.” History of Political Economy 39: 359–401.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 1st edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1953. “Robertson on Utility and Scope.” Economica 20: 99–111.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2000. “Rainforest Realism: A Dennettian Stance.” In Ross, D., Brock, A., and Thompson, D., eds., Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2005. Economic Theory and Cognitive Science: Microexplanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. 2009. “Reply to Hands: On the Robbins–Samuelson Argument Pattern.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (1): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour.” Economica 5: 61–71.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1948. “Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica 15: 243–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, Louis L. 1931. “The Indifference Function.” Journal of Social Psychology 2: 139–67.Google Scholar
Wong, Stanley. 2006. The Foundations of Paul Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. London: Routledge [1st edition 1978].CrossRefGoogle Scholar