Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:56:15.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quesnay's Theory of Taxation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Steven Pressman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

François Quesnay and the Physiocrats are probably best remembered for three things: the Tableau Economique, their view that only agriculture was productive, and for advocating a single tax on landowners. Over the years, attention has focused on the first two doctrines. Numerous studies of the Tableau have attempted to explain how it operates (Eagly 1974; Eltis 1975; Meek 1963; Pressman 1994; Woog 1950). Adam Smith's (1937, p. 638 f.) critique of the assumption that manufacturing is sterile is well-known. In contrast, there have been few analyses of the single tax proposal. Previous studies have either reported the views of Quesnay and the Physiocrats on taxation (Einaudi 1967) or compared the tax policies of Quesnay to other economists (Buurman 1991).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 86 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behrens, C. B. A. 1967. The Ancien Regime, Harcourt, Brace and World, Thames.Google Scholar
Buurman, Gary B. 1991. “A Comparison of the Single Tax Proposals of Henry George and the Physiocrats,” History of Political Economy, 23, no. 3, 481–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabney, Richard Heath. 1906. The Causes of the French Revolution, 2d edition, Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
Eagly, Robert V. 1974. The Structure of Classical Economic Theory, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Einaudi, Luigi. 1967. “The Physiocratic Doctrine of Taxation,” in Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Eltis, Walter A. 1975. “Franç ois Quesnay: A Reinterpretation of the Theory of Economic Growth,” Oxford Economic Papers, 27, no. 3, November, 327–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, Marguerite and Meek, Ronald, eds. 1982. Quesnay's Tableau É conomique, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Lowell, Edward J. 1892. The Eve of the French Revolution, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Meek, Ronald. 1963. The Economics of Physiocracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mirabeau, , Victor, Riqueti, Marquis, de, and François, Quesnay. 1762. L'Ami des Hommes, Avignon.Google Scholar
Pressman, Steven. 1994. Quesnay's Tableau Economique: A Critique and Assessment, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Quesnay, François. 1958. François Quesnay et la Physiocratie, Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Quesnay, François. 1764. Philosophie Rurale, Chez Les Libraires Associés, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1937. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Modern Library, New York.Google Scholar
Spengler, Joseph J. 1960. “Mercantilist and Physiocratic Growth Theory,” in Hoselitz, Bert et al., Theories of Economic Growth, Free Press, Glencoe.Google Scholar
Tsoulfidis, Lefteris. 1989. “The Physiocratic Theory of Tax Incidence,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 36, no. 3, August, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woog, Henri. 1950. The Tableau Economique of François Quesnay, A. Francke A.G. Verlag, Bern.Google Scholar