Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:41:42.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Protective State” Approach to the “Productive State” in The Wealth of Nations: The Odd Case of Lay Patronage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Charles G. Leathers  and
J. Patrick Raines
Charles G. Leathers
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Box 870224, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487–0224
J. Patrick Raines
Affiliation:
School of BusinessUniversity of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From Jacob Viner (1927) to David A. Reisman (1998), Adam Smith's departures from an advocacy of laissez-faire in The Wealth of Nations have been interpreted by a number of scholars. In this paper, we examine one of the oddest, and perhaps least noticed, of those departures. That was Smith's defense of the civil law of lay patronage in the established Presbyterian Church of Scotland, which appears in his discussion of the social benefits and potential social costs of institutions for religious instruction. A lay patron was a non-cleric individual who held the right under civil law to select the minister of a local parish church. In Smith's time, roughly two-thirds of the lay patrons in Scotland were wealthy landowners and one-third were crown officials. In addition, municipal corporations (cities) and universities held some patronage rights.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 427 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Gary M. 1988. “Mr. Smith and the Preachers: The Economics of Religion in the Wealth of Nations” Journal of Political Economy 96 (10): 1066–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J. 1982. Thomas Chalmers and the Godly Commonwealth in Scotland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J. 1993. “The Ten Years' Conflict and the Disruption of 1843.” In Brown, S. J. and Fry, M., eds., Scotland in the Age of Disruption. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Erickson, Arvel B. 1942. “The Non-Intrusion Controversy in Scotland, 1832–1943.” Church History 31 (12): 302–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 1998. “Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy: The Role of Religion and Its Relationship to Philosophy and Ethics in the Evolution of Society.” History of Political Economy 30 (Spring): 17–42.Google Scholar
Ferguson, William 1968. Scotland. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Iannaccone, Laurence R. 1998. “Introduction to the Economics of Religion.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (09): 1465–96.Google Scholar
Leathers, Charles G. and Raines, J. Patrick. 1992. “Adam Smith on Competitive Religious Markets.” History of Political Economy 24 (Summer): 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Jerry Z. 1993. Adam Smith in His Time and Ours. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pack, Spencer J. 1991. Capitalism as a Moral System: Adam Smith's Critique of the Free Market Economy. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Reisman, David A. 1998. “Adam Smith on Market and State.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154 (06): 357–83.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry Into The Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1927. “Adam Smith and Laissez-faire.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (04): 198–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. G. 1990. Adam Smith and Modern Economics. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar