Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:07:30.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Prospects of Heterodox Economics: a Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Malcolm Rutherford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My comments on the papers given by Bob Coats, Roger Backhouse, and Sheila Dow will focus on the history and prospects of institutional economics, as that is the part of the heterodox world I know most about.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 185 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Pitelis, C. N. 1998. “Transaction Costs and the Historical Evolution of the Capitalist Firm.” Journal of Economic Issues 32 (12): 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramstad, Yngve. 1999. “Is a Transaction a Transaction?” Paper presented (in absentia) at the History of Economics Society Meetings, Greensboro, NC, 06 1999.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Ulrich. 1991. “Reflections on the Present State of Evolutionary Economic Theory.” In Hodgson, Geoffrey M. and Screpanti, Ernesto, eds., Rethinking Economics: Markets, Technology and Economic Evolution. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar