Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Evensky, Jerry
2005.
Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy.
Aznar, Estrella Trincado
2007.
Costes de transacción vs costes de jerarquía en la provisión de bienes: una interpretación de la teoría smithiana.
Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
261.
Brewer, Anthony
2007.
The Adam Smith Review.
Vol. 20071843,
Issue. ,
Garnett, Robert F.
2011.
Why should Austrian economists be pluralists?.
The Review of Austrian Economics,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Garnett, Robert F.
2011.
Pluralism, Academic Freedom, and Heterodox Economics.
Review of Radical Political Economics,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 4,
p.
562.
Garnett, Robert
2012.
Experts and Epistemic Monopolies.
p.
227.
Trincado, Estrella
2019.
The Birth of Economic Rhetoric.
p.
87.
Hurtado, Jimena
2019.
Adam Smith and Alexis de Tocqueville on the division of labour*.
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 6,
p.
1187.
Godłów-Legiędź, Janina
2019.
Adam’s Smith’s Concept of a Great Society and its Timeliness.
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
175.
Matson, Erik W.
2021.
What's Liberal About Adam Smith's Liberal Plan?.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Matson, Erik W.
2022.
What is liberal about Adam Smith's “liberal plan”?.
Southern Economic Journal,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 2,
p.
593.
Elazar, Yiftah
2022.
Adam Smith and the idea of free government.
Intellectual History Review,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
691.
Horn, Karen
2023.
Kampf den Klischees: Die jüngere Adam-Smith-Forschung rollt die Interpretation des schottischen Gelehrten neu auf.
Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
184.
Horn, Karen
2024.
Challenging the clichés: How recent scholarship refreshes the interpretation of Adam Smith’s oeuvre.
Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik,